• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较两家市区医院中患者和医务人员对基于急诊的 HIV 检测的态度。

A comparison of patient and staff attitudes about emergency department-based HIV testing in 2 urban hospitals.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44109-1998, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;58(1 Suppl 1):S28-32.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.03.020.

DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.03.020
PMID:21684404
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study compares and contrasts emergency department (ED) patient and staff attitudes towards ED-based HIV testing in 2 major hospitals in a single city, with an attempt to answer the following: Should routine ED-based HIV testing be offered? If so, who should be responsible for disclosing HIV test results? And what barriers might prevent ED-based HIV testing?

METHODS

Paper-based surveys were presented to a convenience sample of ED patients and staff at 2 urban, academic, tertiary care hospitals between December 2007 and June 2009. Descriptive statistics were derived with SAS and MicroSoft Excel. Data are reported in percentages, fractions, and graphs.

RESULTS

A total of 457 patients and 85 staff completed the surveys. The majority of patients favor ED-based HIV testing. Only a minority of ED staff support ED-based HIV testing. In both hospitals, patients prefer to have HIV test results delivered by a physician. This was true for both positive and negative results. However, only about one third of attending physicians feel comfortable disclosing a positive HIV test result. Patients and staff both view privacy and confidentiality as significant barriers to ED-based HIV testing.

CONCLUSION

Although ED patients are overwhelmingly in favor of ED-based HIV testing, the staff is not. Patients and staff agree that physicians should deliver HIV test results to patients, but a significant number of physicians are not comfortable doing so. Historical barriers continue to hinder ED-based HIV testing programs.

摘要

目的

本研究比较并对比了一家城市的两家大型医院急诊部(ED)患者和工作人员对 ED 基础 HIV 检测的态度,试图回答以下问题:是否应该提供常规 ED 基础 HIV 检测?如果是,谁应该负责披露 HIV 检测结果?有哪些障碍可能会阻止 ED 基础 HIV 检测?

方法

2007 年 12 月至 2009 年 6 月期间,在两家城市、学术、三级护理医院,以便利样本的形式向 ED 患者和工作人员发放纸质调查问卷。使用 SAS 和 Microsoft Excel 得出描述性统计数据。数据以百分比、分数和图表形式报告。

结果

共有 457 名患者和 85 名工作人员完成了调查。大多数患者赞成 ED 基础 HIV 检测。只有少数 ED 工作人员支持 ED 基础 HIV 检测。在两家医院,患者都希望由医生来提供 HIV 检测结果。无论是阳性还是阴性结果,都是如此。然而,只有大约三分之一的主治医生表示愿意披露 HIV 阳性检测结果。患者和工作人员都认为隐私和保密性是 ED 基础 HIV 检测的重大障碍。

结论

尽管 ED 患者普遍赞成 ED 基础 HIV 检测,但工作人员并不赞成。患者和工作人员都认为医生应该向患者提供 HIV 检测结果,但相当一部分医生对此感到不舒服。历史障碍继续阻碍 ED 基础 HIV 检测计划。

相似文献

1
A comparison of patient and staff attitudes about emergency department-based HIV testing in 2 urban hospitals.比较两家市区医院中患者和医务人员对基于急诊的 HIV 检测的态度。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;58(1 Suppl 1):S28-32.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.03.020.
2
Using nonrapid HIV technology for routine, opt-out HIV screening in a high-volume urban emergency department.在大容量城市急诊室中使用非快速 HIV 技术进行常规、选择退出的 HIV 筛查。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;58(1 Suppl 1):S79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.03.030.
3
Pediatric emergency department-based rapid HIV testing: adolescent attitudes and preferences.基于儿科急诊科的快速艾滋病毒检测:青少年的态度和偏好。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Jan;27(1):13-6. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182037cde.
4
Emergency medicine resident attitudes and perceptions of HIV testing before and after a focused training program and testing implementation.急诊住院医师在接受集中培训项目和实施 HIV 检测前后对 HIV 检测的态度和看法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;16(11):1165-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00507.x.
5
Implementing routine HIV screening in an urban pediatric emergency department.在城市儿科急诊科开展常规艾滋病毒筛查。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Mar;29(3):319-23. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182850910.
6
Implementation of and barriers to routine HIV screening for adolescents.青少年常规艾滋病毒筛查的实施与障碍
Pediatrics. 2009 Oct;124(4):1076-84. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0237. Epub 2009 Sep 14.
7
Physician-initiated rapid HIV testing in an urban emergency department: comparison of testing using a point-of-care versus a laboratory model.医生主导的城市急诊部门快速 HIV 检测:使用即时检测与实验室检测模式的比较。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;58(1 Suppl 1):S53-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.03.025.
8
Rapid HIV testing in emergency departments--three U.S. sites, January 2005-March 2006.2005年1月至2006年3月美国三个地点急诊科的快速艾滋病毒检测
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007 Jun 22;56(24):597-601.
9
Implementation of a rapid HIV testing programme favourably impacts provider opinions on emergency department HIV testing.实施快速艾滋病毒检测项目对医疗服务提供者对急诊科艾滋病毒检测的看法产生了积极影响。
Emerg Med J. 2014 Sep;31(9):736-40. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202806. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
10
A provider participatory implementation model for HIV testing in an ED.一种 ED 中 HIV 检测的提供者参与式实施模型。
Am J Emerg Med. 2011 May;29(4):418-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.11.016. Epub 2010 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of adolescent HIV screening in two urban pediatric emergency departments in the United States.美国两家城市儿科急诊科开展青少年艾滋病毒筛查工作。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 15;20(4):e0321473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321473. eCollection 2025.
2
"There hasn't been a push to identify patients in the emergency department"-Staff perspectives on automated identification of candidates for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): A qualitative study.“急诊科并没有积极识别患者”——工作人员对自动识别暴露前预防(PrEP)候选者的看法:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 14;19(3):e0300540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300540. eCollection 2024.
3
Assessing attitudes to ED-based HIV testing: Development of a short-structured survey instrument.
评估基于急诊科的 HIV 检测的态度:一种简短结构化调查工具的开发。
PLoS One. 2021 May 27;16(5):e0252372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252372. eCollection 2021.
4
Effect of national HIV testing recommendations and local interventions on HIV testing practices in a Swiss university hospital: a retrospective analysis between 2012 and 2015.国家 HIV 检测建议和当地干预措施对瑞士一所大学医院 HIV 检测实践的影响:2012 年至 2015 年的回顾性分析。
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 3;8(10):e021203. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021203.
5
Implementing emergency department-based HIV testing in a low-resource setting: The value of a structured feasibility assessment tool.在资源匮乏地区实施基于急诊科的艾滋病毒检测:结构化可行性评估工具的价值。
South Afr J HIV Med. 2018 Jul 16;19(1):793. doi: 10.4102/sajhivmed.v19i1.793. eCollection 2018.
6
Patient and provider attitudes to emergency department-based HIV counselling and testing in South Africa.南非患者及医疗服务提供者对基于急诊科的艾滋病毒咨询与检测的态度。
South Afr J HIV Med. 2017 May 31;18(1):707. doi: 10.4102/sajhivmed.v18i1.707. eCollection 2017.
7
HIV testing in a South African Emergency Department: A missed opportunity.南非急诊科的 HIV 检测:错失良机。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 13;13(3):e0193858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193858. eCollection 2018.
8
Missed Testing Opportunities for HIV Screening and Early Diagnosis in an Urban Tertiary Care Center.城市三级医疗中心艾滋病毒筛查和早期诊断的检测机会错失情况。
AIDS Res Treat. 2017;2017:5708620. doi: 10.1155/2017/5708620. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
9
Patient and doctor perspectives on HIV screening in the emergency department: A prospective cross-sectional study.患者与医生对急诊科艾滋病毒筛查的看法:一项前瞻性横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 21;12(7):e0180389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180389. eCollection 2017.
10
Should trained lay providers perform HIV testing? A systematic review to inform World Health Organization guidelines.受过培训的非专业医疗人员应进行HIV检测吗?一项为世界卫生组织指南提供信息的系统评价。
AIDS Care. 2017 Dec;29(12):1473-1479. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2017.1317710. Epub 2017 Apr 24.