Suppr超能文献

初始坐姿后的稳定时间及其与舒适度和不舒适度的关系。

Settling down time following initial sitting and its relationship with comfort and discomfort.

机构信息

Welsh Institute of Chiropractic, University of Glamorgan, Mid Glamorgan, Wales, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Tissue Viability. 2011 Nov;20(4):121-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 Aug 9.

Abstract

This study examined the subjective rating of wheelchair comfort and discomfort (numerical rating scale questionnaire) and the duration of objective in-chair movement reduction "settling down time" following initial contact with the seating surface. Healthy young subjects (n = 22) sat for 5 min on contoured foam or wood cushion surfaces fitted to otherwise identical wheelchairs. Force sensing resistors attached to each quadrant of the sitting interface measured the relative movements of the subjects over time. A significant correlation was found between settling down time (SDT) and reported leg/feet discomfort (p = 0.003; correlation co-efficient = 0.44); and a significant negative correlation was found between SDT and overall comfort (p = 0.015; correlation co-efficient = -0.36). When comparing cushion surfaces: SDT was significantly longer (p < 0.0001) for subjects sitting on wood (5.8 s) compared to contoured foam (3.9 s); Leg/feet discomfort was significant higher (p = 0.007) for subjects sitting on wood (1.1 out of 10) compared to contoured foam (0.3 out of 10); Overall discomfort was significant higher (p = 0.009) for subjects sitting on wood (1.3 out of 10) compared to contoured foam (0.5 out of 10); Comfort was significantly lower (p = 0.001) for subjects sitting on wood (6.5 out of 10) compared to contoured foam (8.3 out of 10); Support was significantly lower (p = 0.001) for subjects sitting on wood (6.4 out of 10) compared to contoured foam (8 out of 10). The results of this study suggest that the shape and firmness of the surface at the buttock-wheelchair interface can affect a subject's SDT following initial contact with the seat as well as their perception of comfort and discomfort. In addition, there appears to be a relationship between longer SDT's and increased discomfort ratings, and shorter SDT's and increased comfort ratings. Therefore, testing for SDT's may be useful in the indirect objective assessment of wheelchair cushions and possibly other types of seating surfaces with design differences that aim to improve comfort and minimize discomfort.

摘要

本研究考察了初始接触座椅表面后,轮椅舒适性和不舒适性的主观评分(数字评分量表问卷)以及客观坐姿减少时间(settling down time)。健康的年轻受试者(n=22)坐在装有不同椅面的轮廓泡沫或木质垫上 5 分钟。附着于坐界面每个象限的力敏电阻器随时间测量受试者的相对运动。发现settling down time(SDT)与腿部/脚部不适报告呈显著相关(p=0.003;相关系数=0.44);SDT 与总体舒适度呈显著负相关(p=0.015;相关系数=-0.36)。当比较垫面时:受试者坐在木质垫上的 SDT 明显更长(p<0.0001)(5.8 秒),而坐在轮廓泡沫垫上的 SDT 更短(3.9 秒);受试者坐在木质垫上的腿部/脚部不适感明显更高(p=0.007)(10 分制 1.1 分),而坐在轮廓泡沫垫上的腿部/脚部不适感明显更低(10 分制 0.3 分);受试者坐在木质垫上的总体不适感明显更高(p=0.009)(10 分制 1.3 分),而坐在轮廓泡沫垫上的总体不适感明显更低(10 分制 0.5 分);受试者坐在木质垫上的舒适度明显更低(p=0.001)(10 分制 6.5 分),而坐在轮廓泡沫垫上的舒适度明显更高(10 分制 8.3 分);受试者坐在木质垫上的支撑感明显更低(p=0.001)(10 分制 6.4 分),而坐在轮廓泡沫垫上的支撑感明显更高(10 分制 8 分)。本研究结果表明,臀椅界面的表面形状和硬度可能会影响受试者初始接触座椅后的 SDT,以及他们对舒适度和不舒适度的感知。此外,较长的 SDT 与更高的不适评分以及较短的 SDT 与更高的舒适度评分之间似乎存在关系。因此,测试 SDT 可能有助于间接客观评估轮椅垫,以及其他类型的具有设计差异的座椅表面,这些设计差异旨在提高舒适度并尽量减少不舒适度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验