• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种柱状仙人掌的茎生物力学:来自索诺兰沙漠。

Stem biomechanics of three columnar cacti from the Sonoran Desert.

出版信息

Am J Bot. 1998 Aug;85(8):1082.

PMID:21684993
Abstract

The allometric relationship of stem length L with respect to mean stem diameter D was determined for 80 shoots of each of three columnar cactus species (Stenocereus thurberi, Lophocereus schottii, and S. gummosus) to determine whether this relationship accords with that predicted by each of three contending models purporting to describe the mechanical architecture of vertical shoots (i.e., geometric, stress, and elastic similitude, which predict L proportional to D(alpha), with alpha = 1/1, 1/2, and 2/3, respectively). In addition, anatomical, physical, and biomechanical stem properties were measured to determine how the stems of these three species maintain their elastic stability as they increase in size. Reduced major axis regression of L with respect to D showed that alpha = 2.82 ± 0.14 for S. thurberi, 2.32 ± 0.19 for L. schottii, and 4.21 ± 0.31 for S. gummosus. Thus, the scaling exponents for the allometry of L differed significantly from that predicted by each of the three biomechanical models. In contrast, these exponents were similar to that for the allometry previously reported for saguaro. Analyses of biomechanical data derived from bending tests performed on 30 stems selected from each of the three species indicated that the bulk stem tissue stiffness was roughly proportional to L2, while stem flexural rigidity (i.e., the ability to resist a bending force) scaled roughly as L3. Stem length was significantly and positively correlated with the volume fraction of wood, while regression analysis of the pooled data from the three species (i.e., 90 stems) indicated that bulk tissue stiffness scaled roughly as the 5/3-power of the volume fraction of wood in stems. These data were interpreted to indicate that wood served as the major stiffening agent in stems and that this tissue accumulates at a sufficient rate to afford unusually high scaling exponents tot stem length with respect to stem diameter (i.e., disproportionately large increments of stem length with respect to increments in stem diameter). Nevertheless, the safety factor against the elastic failure of stems (computed on the basis of the critical buckling height divided by actual stem length) decreased with increasing stem size tot each species, even though each species maintained an average safety factor equal to two. We speculate that the apparent upper limit to plant height calculated for each species may serve as a biomechanical mechanism for vegetative propagation and the establishment of dense plant colonies by means of extreme stem flexure and ultimate breakage, especially for S. gummosus.

摘要

为了确定三个柱状仙人掌物种(钝叶仙人柱、多棱仙人柱和仙人球)的 80 个枝条的茎长 L 与平均茎直径 D 的比例关系,以确定该关系是否符合三个有争议的模型中的每一个,这些模型旨在描述垂直枝条的机械结构(即几何、应力和弹性相似性,分别预测 L 与 D(alpha)成正比,其中 alpha = 1/1、1/2 和 2/3)。此外,还测量了解剖学、物理和生物力学的茎特性,以确定这三个物种的茎如何在增大尺寸的同时保持其弹性稳定性。用 L 对 D 的简化主要轴回归表明,对于钝叶仙人柱,alpha = 2.82 ± 0.14;对于多棱仙人柱,alpha = 2.32 ± 0.19;对于仙人球,alpha = 4.21 ± 0.31。因此,L 的比例关系的标度指数与三个生物力学模型中的每一个都有显著差异。相比之下,这些指数与以前报道的关于 saguaro 的比例关系相似。对从每个物种中选择的 30 个枝条进行弯曲试验得出的生物力学数据分析表明,大部分茎组织的硬度大致与 L2 成正比,而茎的弯曲刚性(即抵抗弯曲力的能力)大致与 L3 成正比。茎长与木质部体积分数呈显著正相关,而对三个物种的汇总数据(即 90 个枝条)的回归分析表明,大部分组织的硬度大致与木质部体积分数的 5/3 次幂成正比。这些数据表明,木质部是茎的主要加固剂,而且这种组织以足够的速度积累,从而提供了与茎直径相比异常高的比例关系(即与茎直径相比,茎长度的增加不成比例)。尽管每个物种的平均安全系数等于 2,但安全系数(根据临界失稳高度除以实际茎长计算)仍然随着每个物种的茎尺寸的增加而减小。我们推测,为每个物种计算的植物高度上限可能是通过极端的茎弯曲和最终断裂来进行营养繁殖和建立密集植物群落的生物力学机制,特别是对于仙人球。

相似文献

1
Stem biomechanics of three columnar cacti from the Sonoran Desert.三种柱状仙人掌的茎生物力学:来自索诺兰沙漠。
Am J Bot. 1998 Aug;85(8):1082.
2
On the mechanical properties of the rare endemic cactus Stenocereus eruca and the related species S. gummosus.关于珍稀特有仙人掌物种埃氏刺翁柱及其近缘物种胶质刺翁柱的力学特性
Am J Bot. 2003 May;90(5):663-74. doi: 10.3732/ajb.90.5.663.
3
Biomechanics of the columnar cactus Pachycereus pringlei.柱状仙人掌皮氏刺翁柱的生物力学
Am J Bot. 1999 Jun;86(6):767-75.
4
Changes in the factor of safety within the superstructure of a dicot tree.双子叶植物树干上部结构安全系数的变化。
Am J Bot. 1999 May;86(5):688-96.
5
THE SCALING OF PLANT AND ANIMAL BODY MASS, LENGTH, AND DIAMETER.植物和动物的体重、长度及直径的缩放比例
Evolution. 1994 Feb;48(1):44-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb01293.x.
6
The mechanical role of bark.树皮的力学作用。
Am J Bot. 1999 Apr;86(4):465-9.
7
Biomechanical consequences of scaling.洁治术的生物力学后果。
J Exp Biol. 2005 May;208(Pt 9):1665-76. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01520.
8
Wood biomechanics and anatomy of PACHYCEREUS PRINGLEI.厚壳树的木材生物力学和解剖结构。
Am J Bot. 2000 Apr;87(4):469-81.
9
Stem extension and mechanical stability of Xanthium canadense grown in an open or in a dense stand.在开阔地或密集植株丛中生长的加拿大苍耳的茎伸长与机械稳定性。
Ann Bot. 2014 Jul;114(1):179-90. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu088. Epub 2014 May 30.
10
The role of wood mass density and mechanical constraints in the economy of tree architecture.木材密度和机械约束在树木结构经济性中的作用。
Am Nat. 2010 Feb;175(2):250-60. doi: 10.1086/649581.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural performance of a climbing cactus: making the most of softness.攀爬仙人掌的结构性能:充分利用柔软性。
J R Soc Interface. 2021 May;18(178):20210040. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0040. Epub 2021 May 12.
2
Fasciclin-Like Arabinogalactan-Protein 16 (FLA16) Is Required for Stem Development in .类成束蛋白阿拉伯半乳聚糖蛋白16(FLA16)是[具体植物名称未给出]茎发育所必需的 。
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Dec 11;11:615392. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.615392. eCollection 2020.
3
Self-Repair in Cacti Branches: Comparative Analyses of Their Morphology, Anatomy, and Biomechanics.
仙人掌分枝的自我修复:形态、解剖结构和生物力学的比较分析。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jun 29;21(13):4630. doi: 10.3390/ijms21134630.
4
Pillar of strength: Columnar cactus as a key factor in Yoreme heritage and wildland preservation.支柱的力量:柱状仙人掌作为约瑞姆遗产和荒地保护的关键因素。
Ambio. 2018 Feb;47(1):86-96. doi: 10.1007/s13280-017-0940-8. Epub 2017 Sep 5.