• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The construct and predictive validity of a dynamic assessment of young children learning to read: implications for RTI frameworks.儿童阅读学习动态评估的构建与预测效度:对 RTI 框架的启示。
J Learn Disabil. 2011 Jul-Aug;44(4):339-47. doi: 10.1177/0022219411407864. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
2
The effect of a multicomponent literacy instruction model on literacy growth for kindergartners and first-grade students in Chile.智利的一项多元文化读写教学模式对幼儿园和一年级学生读写能力发展的影响。
Int J Psychol. 2013;48(5):747-61. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2012.719628. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
3
The relation of linguistic awareness and vocabulary to word reading and spelling for first-grade students participating in response to intervention.参与干预的一年级学生的语言意识和词汇量与单词阅读和拼写的关系。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2013 Oct;44(4):337-47. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2013/12-0013). Epub 2013 Jul 5.
4
The relations of SES and literacy-related oral and written language skills after one year of reading instruction - evidence from novice readers of Arabic.社会经济地位(SES)与读写相关的口语和书面语言技能的关系——来自阿拉伯语初学者阅读教学一年后的证据。
J Child Lang. 2024 Jul;51(4):834-856. doi: 10.1017/S0305000922000538. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
5
Predicting response to early reading intervention from verbal IQ, reading-related language abilities, attention ratings, and verbal IQ-word reading discrepancy: failure to validate discrepancy method.从言语智商、阅读相关语言能力、注意力评分以及言语智商与单词阅读差异预测早期阅读干预的反应:差异方法验证失败。
J Learn Disabil. 2003 Jan-Feb;36(1):24-33. doi: 10.1177/00222194030360010401.
6
Beginning to Read in Vietnamese: Kindergarten Precursors to First Grade Fluency and Reading Comprehension.从越南语开始阅读:幼儿园阶段为一年级的流利阅读和阅读理解奠定基础。
Read Writ. 2021 Jan;34(1):139-169. doi: 10.1007/s11145-020-10066-w. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
7
Reading First kindergarten classroom instruction and students' growth in phonological awareness and letter naming-decoding fluency.“阅读优先”幼儿园课堂教学与学生语音意识及字母命名解码流畅性的发展
J Sch Psychol. 2008 Jun;46(3):281-314. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2007.06.002. Epub 2007 Aug 14.
8
Preliteracy Skills Mediate the Relation Between Early Speech Sound Production and Subsequent Reading Outcomes.前读写技能中介了早期语音产生与后续阅读结果之间的关系。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Aug 3;66(8):2766-2782. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00142. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
9
Development of First-Graders' Word Reading Skills: For Whom Can Dynamic Assessment Tell Us More?一年级学生单词阅读技能的发展:动态评估对谁能为我们提供更多信息?
J Learn Disabil. 2017 Jan;50(1):95-112. doi: 10.1177/0022219415599343. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
10
Differences in the predictors of reading comprehension in first graders from low socio-economic status families with either good or poor decoding skills.来自社会经济地位较低家庭且解码技能良好或较差的一年级学生在阅读理解预测因素方面的差异。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0119581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119581. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting Risk for Comorbid Reading and Mathematics Disability Using Fluency-Based Screening Assessments.使用基于流畅性的筛查评估预测共病阅读和数学障碍的风险。
Learn Disabil Res Pract. 2022 May;37(2):100-112. doi: 10.1111/ldrp.12278. Epub 2022 May 1.
2
Towards a South African model of language-based learning disability.迈向基于语言的学习障碍的南非模式。
S Afr J Commun Disord. 2019 Nov 22;66(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v66i1.634.
3
Integrating Curriculum-Based Dynamic Assessment in Computerized Adaptive Testing: Development and Predictive Validity of the EDPL-BAI Battery on Reading Competence.将基于课程的动态评估整合到计算机自适应测试中:EDPL-BAI 阅读能力测试组合的开发与预测效度
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 28;9:1492. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01492. eCollection 2018.
4
Response-To-Intervention in Finland and the United States: Mathematics Learning Support as an Example.芬兰和美国的回应干预模式:以数学学习支持为例
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 5;9:800. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00800. eCollection 2018.
5
Dynamic Assessment of Reading Difficulties: Predictive and Incremental Validity on Attitude toward Reading and the Use of Dialogue/Participation Strategies in Classroom Activities.阅读困难的动态评估:对阅读态度以及课堂活动中对话/参与策略使用情况的预测效度和增量效度
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 13;8:173. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00173. eCollection 2017.
6
The effect of a specialized dyslexia font, OpenDyslexic, on reading rate and accuracy.一种专门的阅读障碍字体OpenDyslexic对阅读速度和准确性的影响。
Ann Dyslexia. 2017 Jul;67(2):114-127. doi: 10.1007/s11881-016-0127-1. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
7
Early Screening for Risk of Reading Disabilities: Recommendations for a Four-Step Screening System.阅读障碍风险的早期筛查:四步筛查系统的建议
Assess Eff Interv. 2012 Dec;38(1):6-14. doi: 10.1177/1534508412451491.
8
Examining the predictive validity of a dynamic assessment of decoding to forecast response to tier 2 intervention.检验解码动态评估对预测二级干预反应的预测效度。
J Learn Disabil. 2014 Sep-Oct;47(5):409-23. doi: 10.1177/0022219412466703. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
9
First-grade cognitive abilities as long-term predictors of reading comprehension and disability status.一年级认知能力是阅读理解和残疾状况的长期预测指标。
J Learn Disabil. 2012 May-Jun;45(3):217-31. doi: 10.1177/0022219412442154.
10
Responsiveness-to-intervention: a decade later.反应性干预:十年后。
J Learn Disabil. 2012 May-Jun;45(3):195-203. doi: 10.1177/0022219412442150.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Word Identification Fluency to Monitor First-Grade Reading Development.运用单词识别流畅性来监测一年级阅读发展情况。
Except Child. 2012 Jan;78(2):201-220. doi: 10.1177/001440291207800204.
2
Dynamic assessment and response to intervention: two sides of one coin.动态评估与干预反应:硬币的两面。
J Learn Disabil. 2009 Mar-Apr;42(2):111-32. doi: 10.1177/0022219408326207. Epub 2008 Dec 10.

儿童阅读学习动态评估的构建与预测效度:对 RTI 框架的启示。

The construct and predictive validity of a dynamic assessment of young children learning to read: implications for RTI frameworks.

机构信息

Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203-5721, USA.

出版信息

J Learn Disabil. 2011 Jul-Aug;44(4):339-47. doi: 10.1177/0022219411407864. Epub 2011 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1177/0022219411407864
PMID:21685347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4864489/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the construct and predictive validity of a dynamic assessment (DA) of decoding learning. Students (N = 318) were assessed in the fall of first grade on an array of instruments that were given in hopes of forecasting responsiveness to reading instruction. These instruments included DA as well as one-point-in-time (static) measures of early alphabetic knowledge, rapid automatized naming (RAN), phonemic awareness, oral vocabulary, listening comprehension, attentive behavior, and hyperactive or impulsive behavior. An IQ test was administered in spring of second grade. Measures of reading outcomes administered in spring of first grade were accuracy and fluency of word identification skills and reading comprehension. Factor analysis using principal axis factor extraction indicated that DA loaded on a first factor that also included language abilities and IQ, which the authors refer to as the "language, IQ, and DA" factor. It was relatively distinct from two additional factors: (a) "speeded alphabetic knowledge and RAN" and (b) "task-oriented behavior." A three-level (children nested within classroom; classrooms nested within school) random intercept model with fixed effects predictors suggested that DA differed from word attack in predicting future reading skill and that DA was a significant predictor of responsiveness to instruction, contributing unique variance to end-of-first-grade word identification and reading comprehension beyond that explained by other well-established predictors of reading development.

摘要

本研究旨在检验解码学习的动态评估(DA)的结构和预测效度。在一年级秋季,学生(N=318)接受了一系列旨在预测对阅读教学反应的工具的评估。这些工具包括 DA 以及早期字母知识的单点(静态)测量、快速自动命名(RAN)、语音意识、口语词汇、听力理解、注意力行为和多动或冲动行为。在二年级春季进行了智商测试。在一年级春季进行的阅读结果测量包括单词识别技能的准确性和流畅性以及阅读理解。使用主成分因子提取的因子分析表明,DA 加载在一个包含语言能力和智商的第一个因子上,作者称之为“语言、智商和 DA”因子。它与另外两个因子相对不同:(a)“快速字母知识和 RAN”和(b)“任务导向行为”。具有固定效应预测因子的三级(儿童嵌套在班级内;班级嵌套在学校内)随机截距模型表明,DA 在预测未来阅读技能方面与单词攻击不同,并且 DA 是对教学反应的显著预测因子,除了其他经过充分验证的阅读发展预测因子解释的之外,对第一年级末的单词识别和阅读理解有独特的贡献。