• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Using Word Identification Fluency to Monitor First-Grade Reading Development.运用单词识别流畅性来监测一年级阅读发展情况。
Except Child. 2012 Jan;78(2):201-220. doi: 10.1177/001440291207800204.
2
Monitoring early first-grade reading progress: a comparison of two measures.监测一年级早期阅读进展:两种测量方法的比较
J Learn Disabil. 2014 May-Jun;47(3):254-70. doi: 10.1177/0022219412454455. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
3
Using Arabic word identification fluency to monitor first-grade reading progress.利用阿拉伯语单词识别流畅度监测一年级阅读进展。
Dyslexia. 2014 May;20(2):167-74. doi: 10.1002/dys.1472. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
4
Growth on sublexical fluency progress monitoring measures in early kindergarten and relations to word reading acquisition.早期幼儿园次词汇流畅度进展监测指标的增长与单词阅读习得的关系。
J Sch Psychol. 2020 Apr;79:43-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2020.01.003. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
5
First-grade cognitive abilities as long-term predictors of reading comprehension and disability status.一年级认知能力是阅读理解和残疾状况的长期预测指标。
J Learn Disabil. 2012 May-Jun;45(3):217-31. doi: 10.1177/0022219412442154.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Phonics training for English-speaking poor readers.针对说英语的阅读障碍者的自然拼读法训练。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 14;11(11):CD009115. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009115.pub3.
8
The effects of varied practice on the oral reading fluency of fourth-grade students.不同练习方式对四年级学生朗读流畅度的影响。
J Sch Psychol. 2019 Dec;77:24-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.10.003. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
9
Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.小班教学对提高中小学学生成绩的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 11;14(1):1-107. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.10. eCollection 2018.
10
The Relative Effects of Instruction Linking Word Reading and Word Meaning Compared to Word Reading Instruction Alone on the Accuracy, Fluency, and Word Meaning Knowledge of 4th-5th Grade Students With Dyslexia.与单纯的单词阅读教学相比,将单词阅读与词义教学相联系的教学方式对四至五年级诵读困难学生的准确性、流畅性及词义知识的相对影响。
Sci Stud Read. 2022;26(3):204-222. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2021.1947294. Epub 2021 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comorbid Word Reading and Mathematics Computation Difficulty at Start of First Grade.一年级开始时共病的单词阅读和数学计算困难。
J Learn Disabil. 2025 Mar-Apr;58(2):112-127. doi: 10.1177/00222194241248188. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
2
Data-Based Individualization in Reading.阅读中基于数据的个性化
Read Leag J. 2022 Jan-Feb;3(1):4-13.
3
Connections between Mathematics and Reading Development: Numerical Cognition Mediates Relations between Foundational Competencies and Later Academic Outcomes.数学与阅读发展之间的联系:数字认知在基础能力与后期学业成果之间起中介作用。
J Educ Psychol. 2022 Feb;114(2):273-288. doi: 10.1037/edu0000670. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
4
Closing the Word-Problem Achievement Gap in First Grade: Schema-Based Word-Problem Intervention with Embedded Language Comprehension Instruction.缩小一年级应用题成绩差距:基于图式的应用题干预与嵌入式语言理解教学
J Educ Psychol. 2021 Jan;113(1):86-103. doi: 10.1037/edu0000467. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
5
Improving Language Comprehension to Enhance Word-Problem Solving.提高语言理解能力以增强解决文字问题的能力。
Read Writ Q. 2020;36(2):142-156. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
6
Using Moderator Analysis to Identify the First-Grade Children Who Benefit More and Less from a Reading Comprehension Program: A Step Toward Aptitude-by-Treatment Interaction.使用调节分析来识别从阅读理解计划中受益更多和更少的一年级儿童:迈向能力与治疗相互作用的一步。
Except Child. 2019 Jan;85(2):229-247. doi: 10.1177/0014402918802801. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
7
Text Comprehension and Oral Language as Predictors of Word-Problem Solving: Insights into Word-Problem Solving as a Form of Text Comprehension.文本理解与口语能力作为解决文字问题的预测因素:对作为文本理解形式之一的解决文字问题的见解。
Sci Stud Read. 2018;22(2):152-166. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2017.1398259. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
8
Consequences of Misspecifying Levels of Variance in Cross-Classified Longitudinal Data Structures.交叉分类纵向数据结构中方差水平误设的后果。
Front Psychol. 2016 May 18;7:695. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00695. eCollection 2016.
9
Effects of First-Grade Number Knowledge Tutoring With Contrasting Forms of Practice.一年级数字知识辅导与不同练习形式的效果。
J Educ Psychol. 2013 Jan 1;105(1):58-77. doi: 10.1037/a0030127.
10
Examining the predictive validity of a dynamic assessment of decoding to forecast response to tier 2 intervention.检验解码动态评估对预测二级干预反应的预测效度。
J Learn Disabil. 2014 Sep-Oct;47(5):409-23. doi: 10.1177/0022219412466703. Epub 2012 Dec 4.

本文引用的文献

1
The importance of measuring growth in response to intervention models: Testing a core assumption.衡量针对干预模型的生长反应的重要性:检验一个核心假设。
Learn Individ Differ. 2008;18(3):308-315. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.04.005.
2
Selecting At-Risk First-Grade Readers for Early Intervention: Eliminating False Positives and Exploring the Promise of a Two-Stage Gated Screening Process.为早期干预选择有风险的一年级阅读者:消除误报并探索两阶段门控筛查过程的前景。
J Educ Psychol. 2010 May 1;102(2):327-340. doi: 10.1037/a0018448.
3
Reading fluency: implications for the assessment of children with reading disabilities.阅读流畅度:对阅读障碍儿童评估的启示。
Ann Dyslexia. 2010 Jun;60(1):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s11881-009-0031-z. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
4
Floor effects associated with universal screening and their impact on the early identification of reading disabilities.与普遍筛查相关的地板效应及其对阅读障碍早期识别的影响。
J Learn Disabil. 2009 Mar-Apr;42(2):163-76. doi: 10.1177/0022219408326219. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
5
Identifying valid measures of reading.识别有效的阅读测量方法。
Except Child. 1982 Sep;49(1):36-45.
6
Curriculum-based measurement: the emerging alternative.基于课程的测评:新兴的替代方案。
Except Child. 1985 Nov;52(3):219-32. doi: 10.1177/001440298505200303.

运用单词识别流畅性来监测一年级阅读发展情况。

Using Word Identification Fluency to Monitor First-Grade Reading Development.

作者信息

Zumeta Rebecca O, Compton Donald L, Fuchs Lynn S

出版信息

Except Child. 2012 Jan;78(2):201-220. doi: 10.1177/001440291207800204.

DOI:10.1177/001440291207800204
PMID:22736804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3380540/
Abstract

This study assessed the effects of sampling breadth on technical features of word identification fluency (WIF), a tool for screening and monitoring the reading development of first graders. From a potential pool of 704 first-grade students, the authors measured both a representative sample (n = 284) and 2 other subgroups: those with low reading achievement (n = 202) and those with high/average achievement (n = 213). Data were collected weekly on broadly and narrowly sampled WIF lists for 15 weeks and on criterion measures in the fall and spring. Broad lists were developed by sampling words from 500 high-frequency words, whereas narrow lists were created by sampling from the 133 words from Dolch preprimer, primer, and first-grade word lists. Overall, predictive validity for performance level, predictive validity for growth, and commonality analysis showed narrow sampling was better for screening the representative group and the high/average subgroup. Broad sampling was superior for screening the low-achieving subgroup and for progress monitoring across groups.

摘要

本研究评估了抽样广度对单词识别流畅性(WIF)技术特征的影响,WIF是一种用于筛查和监测一年级学生阅读发展的工具。作者从704名一年级学生的潜在群体中,测量了一个代表性样本(n = 284)以及另外两个亚组:阅读成绩低的学生(n = 202)和阅读成绩高/中等的学生(n = 213)。每周收集15周广泛抽样和狭窄抽样的WIF列表数据,以及秋季和春季的标准测量数据。广泛列表是通过从500个高频单词中抽样生成的,而狭窄列表则是从多尔奇预备级、初级和一年级单词列表中的133个单词中抽样创建的。总体而言,表现水平的预测效度、增长的预测效度和共性分析表明,狭窄抽样更适合筛查代表性群体和高/中等亚组。广泛抽样在筛查低成就亚组和跨组进展监测方面更具优势。