Zumeta Rebecca O, Compton Donald L, Fuchs Lynn S
Except Child. 2012 Jan;78(2):201-220. doi: 10.1177/001440291207800204.
This study assessed the effects of sampling breadth on technical features of word identification fluency (WIF), a tool for screening and monitoring the reading development of first graders. From a potential pool of 704 first-grade students, the authors measured both a representative sample (n = 284) and 2 other subgroups: those with low reading achievement (n = 202) and those with high/average achievement (n = 213). Data were collected weekly on broadly and narrowly sampled WIF lists for 15 weeks and on criterion measures in the fall and spring. Broad lists were developed by sampling words from 500 high-frequency words, whereas narrow lists were created by sampling from the 133 words from Dolch preprimer, primer, and first-grade word lists. Overall, predictive validity for performance level, predictive validity for growth, and commonality analysis showed narrow sampling was better for screening the representative group and the high/average subgroup. Broad sampling was superior for screening the low-achieving subgroup and for progress monitoring across groups.
本研究评估了抽样广度对单词识别流畅性(WIF)技术特征的影响,WIF是一种用于筛查和监测一年级学生阅读发展的工具。作者从704名一年级学生的潜在群体中,测量了一个代表性样本(n = 284)以及另外两个亚组:阅读成绩低的学生(n = 202)和阅读成绩高/中等的学生(n = 213)。每周收集15周广泛抽样和狭窄抽样的WIF列表数据,以及秋季和春季的标准测量数据。广泛列表是通过从500个高频单词中抽样生成的,而狭窄列表则是从多尔奇预备级、初级和一年级单词列表中的133个单词中抽样创建的。总体而言,表现水平的预测效度、增长的预测效度和共性分析表明,狭窄抽样更适合筛查代表性群体和高/中等亚组。广泛抽样在筛查低成就亚组和跨组进展监测方面更具优势。