Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 307 E 63rd St, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10021, USA.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jul 6;103(13):1002-6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr202. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
Long-standing guidelines against screening high-risk individuals for lung cancer may change following the publication of the randomized National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), which shows a benefit of computed tomography compared with chest x-ray screening. Guideline panels will likely also seek additional information from nonrandomized studies of computed tomography screening, such as the Early Lung Cancer Action Project (ELCAP). However, for the ELCAP findings to be incorporated into new guidelines, some inconsistencies in the published data should first be resolved. Specifically, some of the reports from ELCAP appear to contradict others in terms of important endpoints, and several findings from ELCAP appear to be statistically improbable or outliers when compared with analyses and studies by other research groups. Clarification of both internal and external inconsistencies is a prerequisite for evaluation of the body of work published by ELCAP investigators.
长期以来,针对肺癌高危人群进行筛查的指南一直存在争议。然而,随着随机的全国肺癌筛查试验(NLST)的发表,这种情况可能会发生改变。该试验表明,与胸部 X 光筛查相比,计算机断层扫描(CT)筛查具有优势。指南制定小组可能还会从 CT 筛查的非随机研究中寻求更多信息,如早期肺癌行动项目(ELCAP)。然而,为了将 ELCAP 的研究结果纳入新的指南,首先应该解决发表数据中的一些不一致问题。具体来说,ELCAP 的一些报告在重要终点方面似乎与其他报告相矛盾,而且与其他研究小组的分析和研究相比,ELCAP 的一些研究结果在统计学上似乎不太可能或属于异常值。只有明确内部和外部的一致性问题,才能对 ELCAP 研究人员发表的研究成果进行评估。