• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于拟行非侵入性治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者:前瞻性随机 PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) 试验的亚组研究。

Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes intended for non-invasive management: substudy from prospective randomised PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial.

机构信息

Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Sweden.

出版信息

BMJ. 2011 Jun 17;342:d3527. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d3527.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.d3527
PMID:21685437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3117310/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes in patients in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial who at randomisation were planned for a non-invasive treatment strategy.

DESIGN

Pre-specified analysis of pre-randomisation defined subgroup of prospective randomised clinical trial.

SETTING

862 centres in 43 countries.

PARTICIPANTS

5216 (28%) of 18,624 patients admitted to hospital for acute coronary syndrome who were specified as planned for non-invasive management.

INTERVENTIONS

Randomised treatment with ticagrelor (n=2601) versus clopidogrel (2615).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke; their individual components; and PLATO defined major bleeding during one year.

RESULTS

2183 (41.9%) patients had coronary angiography during their initial hospital admission, 1065 (20.4%) had percutaneous coronary intervention, and 208 (4.0%) had coronary artery bypass surgery. Cumulatively, 3143 (60.3%) patients had been managed non-invasively by the end of follow-up. The incidence of the primary end point was lower with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel (12.0% (n=295) v 14.3% (346); hazard ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.73 to 1.00; P=0.04). Overall mortality was also lower (6.1% (147) v 8.2% (195); 0.75, 0.61 to 0.93; P=0.01). The incidence of total major bleeding (11.9% (272) v 10.3% (238); 1.17, 0.98 to 1.39; P=0.08) and non-coronary artery bypass grafting related major bleeding (4.0% (90) v 3.1% (71); 1.30, 0.95 to 1.77; P=0.10) was numerically higher with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute coronary syndrome initially intended for non-invasive management, the benefits of ticagrelor over clopidogrel were consistent with those from the overall PLATO results, indicating the broad benefits of P2Y12 inhibition with ticagrelor regardless of intended management strategy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trials NCT00391872.

摘要

目的

评估 PLATO 试验中随机分组时计划采用非侵入性治疗策略的患者的疗效和安全性结局。

设计

前瞻性随机临床试验中预先指定的亚组分析。

设置

43 个国家的 862 个中心。

参与者

5216 例(28%)急性冠状动脉综合征住院患者,预先指定为接受非侵入性管理。

干预措施

随机接受替格瑞洛(n=2601)或氯吡格雷(n=2615)治疗。

主要观察指标

心血管死亡、心肌梗死和卒中和其各自的组成部分;PLATO 定义的一年期间大出血的主要复合终点。

结果

2183 例(41.9%)患者在初始住院期间接受冠状动脉造影检查,1065 例(20.4%)接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,208 例(4.0%)接受冠状动脉旁路移植术。累计有 3143 例(60.3%)患者在随访结束时接受非侵入性治疗。替格瑞洛组的主要终点发生率低于氯吡格雷组(12.0%(n=295)vs. 14.3%(346);风险比 0.85,95%置信区间 0.73 至 1.00;P=0.04)。总死亡率也较低(6.1%(147)vs. 8.2%(195);0.75,0.61 至 0.93;P=0.01)。替格瑞洛组的总大出血发生率(11.9%(272)vs. 10.3%(238);1.17,0.98 至 1.39;P=0.08)和非冠状动脉旁路移植术相关大出血发生率(4.0%(90)vs. 3.1%(71);1.30,0.95 至 1.77;P=0.10)也高于氯吡格雷组。

结论

在最初计划采用非侵入性治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,替格瑞洛的获益与总体 PLATO 结果一致,表明无论采用何种治疗策略,替格瑞洛均可广泛抑制 P2Y12 带来获益。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00391872。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf17/4788002/f59d96d2d9d4/jams851642.f5_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf17/4788002/9ad78c0eeefb/jams851642.f1_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf17/4788002/1d9afe16cd6d/jams851642.f2_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf17/4788002/c79e87fe5b56/jams851642.f3_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf17/4788002/2e21492ac7d5/jams851642.f4_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf17/4788002/f59d96d2d9d4/jams851642.f5_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf17/4788002/9ad78c0eeefb/jams851642.f1_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf17/4788002/1d9afe16cd6d/jams851642.f2_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf17/4788002/c79e87fe5b56/jams851642.f3_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf17/4788002/2e21492ac7d5/jams851642.f4_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf17/4788002/f59d96d2d9d4/jams851642.f5_default.jpg

相似文献

1
Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes intended for non-invasive management: substudy from prospective randomised PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于拟行非侵入性治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者:前瞻性随机 PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) 试验的亚组研究。
BMJ. 2011 Jun 17;342:d3527. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d3527.
2
Angiographic outcomes in the PLATO Trial (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes).PLATO 试验(血小板抑制和患者结局)的血管造影结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jul;6(7):671-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.03.014.
3
Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes: a substudy from the prospective randomized PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于老年急性冠脉综合征患者的疗效比较:前瞻性随机血小板抑制与患者预后(PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes,PLATO)试验的一项子研究
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):680-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.964395.
4
Clinically significant bleeding with low-dose rivaroxaban versus aspirin, in addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in acute coronary syndromes (GEMINI-ACS-1): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised trial.在急性冠脉综合征(GEMINI-ACS-1)中,与低剂量利伐沙班加 P2Y12 抑制相比,加用阿司匹林导致临床显著出血:一项双盲、多中心、随机试验。
Lancet. 2017 May 6;389(10081):1799-1808. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30751-1. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
5
Reduction in first and recurrent cardiovascular events with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in the PLATO Study.PLATO 研究显示,与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛降低了首次和复发的心血管事件。
Circulation. 2013 Feb 12;127(6):673-80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.124248. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
6
Cost-effectiveness of 12-month treatment with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in the management of acute coronary syndromes.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷治疗急性冠脉综合征 12 个月的成本效果比较。
Clin Ther. 2013 Aug;35(8):1110-1117.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.06.015. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
7
Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome: A retrospective analysis from the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) Trial.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于亚洲急性冠状动脉综合征患者的疗效比较:来自血小板抑制与患者预后(PLATO)试验的回顾性分析
Am Heart J. 2015 Jun;169(6):899-905.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.03.015. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
8
Comparison of ticagrelor with clopidogrel in patients with a planned invasive strategy for acute coronary syndromes (PLATO): a randomised double-blind study.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于拟行侵入性治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的比较(PLATO):一项随机、双盲研究。
Lancet. 2010 Jan 23;375(9711):283-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62191-7. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
9
Factors contributing to the lower mortality with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.导致行经冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者使用替格瑞洛较氯吡格雷死亡率更低的因素。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 23;60(17):1623-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.021. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
10
Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Analysis From the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) Trial.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于急性冠脉综合征合并慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疗效比较:来自血小板抑制与患者预后(PLATO)试验的分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Oct 9;4(10):e002490. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002490.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal dual antiplatelet therapy for coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.冠状动脉旁路移植术的最佳双联抗血小板治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis. 2025 Mar 20;10:e16-e27. doi: 10.5114/amsad/202297. eCollection 2025.
2
Antithrombotic therapy for a case report of acute myocardial infarction after laparoscopic radical cystectomy.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术后急性心肌梗死病例报告的抗栓治疗
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jan 3;15:1477715. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1477715. eCollection 2024.
3
[Management of acute coronary syndrome].

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of ticagrelor with clopidogrel in patients with a planned invasive strategy for acute coronary syndromes (PLATO): a randomised double-blind study.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于拟行侵入性治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的比较(PLATO):一项随机、双盲研究。
Lancet. 2010 Jan 23;375(9711):283-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62191-7. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
2
Comparative trends in guidelines adherence among patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes treated with invasive versus conservative management strategies: Results from the CRUSADE quality improvement initiative.采用侵入性与保守性管理策略治疗的非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者在指南依从性方面的比较趋势:CRUSADE质量改进计划的结果
Am Heart J. 2009 Nov;158(5):748-754.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.09.008.
3
[急性冠状动脉综合征的管理]
Herz. 2025 Feb;50(1):66-76. doi: 10.1007/s00059-024-05284-9. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
4
Coronary Artery Aneurysm Thrombosis Causing Acute Myocardial Infarction in an Adolescent With Neurofibromatosis Type 1.1型神经纤维瘤病青少年患者冠状动脉瘤血栓形成致急性心肌梗死
JACC Case Rep. 2024 Sep 4;29(17):102488. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2024.102488.
5
The Current State of Realistic Heart Models for Disease Modelling and Cardiotoxicity.现实心脏模型在疾病建模和心脏毒性研究中的应用现状。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Aug 24;25(17):9186. doi: 10.3390/ijms25179186.
6
Current Management of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的当前管理
Biomedicines. 2024 Aug 2;12(8):1736. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12081736.
7
Antiplatelet Therapy for Elderly Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时的抗血小板治疗
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 19;13(14):4229. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144229.
8
Efficacy and Safety Profile of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Cureus. 2023 Oct 4;15(10):e46455. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46455. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
Balancing the risks of bleeding and ischaemia in myocardial infarction patients at high bleeding risk.平衡高出血风险心肌梗死患者出血与缺血的风险
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2023 Dec 14;9(8):770-771. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad068.
10
The Implementation of Pharmacogenetics in the United Kingdom.英国的药物遗传学实施情况。
Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2023;280:3-32. doi: 10.1007/164_2023_658.
Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于急性冠脉综合征患者的比较
N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 10;361(11):1045-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0904327. Epub 2009 Aug 30.
4
The paradoxical use of cardiac catheterization in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: lessons from the Can Rapid Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the ACC /AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) Quality Improvement Initiative.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者心脏导管插入术的矛盾应用:来自“不稳定型心绞痛患者能否通过早期实施ACC/AHA指南抑制不良结局的快速分层(CRUSADE)质量改进计划”的经验教训
Am Heart J. 2009 Aug;158(2):263-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.05.016.
5
Prevalence, predictors, and impact of conservative medical management for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes who have angiographically documented significant coronary disease.对于血管造影显示有明显冠状动脉疾病的非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者,保守药物治疗的患病率、预测因素及影响
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Aug;1(4):369-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.03.019.
6
Comparison of ticagrelor, the first reversible oral P2Y(12) receptor antagonist, with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes: Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial.首个可逆性口服P2Y(12)受体拮抗剂替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在急性冠脉综合征患者中的比较:血小板抑制和患者预后(PLATO)试验的原理、设计及基线特征
Am Heart J. 2009 Apr;157(4):599-605. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.01.003.
7
Diverging associations of an intended early invasive strategy compared with actual revascularization, and outcome in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the problem of treatment selection bias.与实际血运重建相比,非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者采用预期早期侵入性策略的不同关联及结局:治疗选择偏倚问题
Eur Heart J. 2009 Mar;30(6):645-54. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn438. Epub 2008 Sep 29.
8
Noninvasive, medical management for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.
Am Heart J. 2008 Mar;155(3):397-407. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.11.014.
9
ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction): developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons: endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会2007年不稳定型心绞痛/非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组(修订2002年不稳定型心绞痛/非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者管理指南写作委员会)报告:与美国急诊医师学会、心血管造影和介入学会以及胸外科医师学会合作制定:得到美国心血管和肺康复协会以及学术急诊医学学会认可。
Circulation. 2007 Aug 14;116(7):e148-304. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.181940. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
10
Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征诊断和治疗指南
Eur Heart J. 2007 Jul;28(13):1598-660. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm161. Epub 2007 Jun 14.