• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗中慢性阻塞性肺疾病误诊的相关因素。

Factors associated with misdiagnosis of COPD in primary care.

作者信息

Walters Julia A, Walters E Haydn, Nelson Mark, Robinson Andrew, Scott Jenn, Turner Paul, Wood-Baker Richard

机构信息

Menzies Research Institute, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia.

出版信息

Prim Care Respir J. 2011 Dec;20(4):396-402. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2011.00039.

DOI:10.4104/pcrj.2011.00039
PMID:21687918
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6549875/
Abstract

AIMS

To assess the misclassification of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Australian primary care.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed in 31 (19%) practices in one Australian state. 341 patients with COPD (database diagnosis or current use of tiotropium plus GP confirmation) completed spirometry and questionnaires. Predictors of misclassification were investigated with multi-level mixed-effects logistic regression allowing for clustering by practice.

RESULTS

Spirometric confirmation of COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) ratio <0.7) was not present in 107 (31%) patients; 60 (56%) had normal lung function, seven (7%) had scalloped flow-volume curves and FEV1 <80% predicted, 40 (37%) had restriction (FVC <80% predicted). Among 107 misclassified patients the bronchodilators used were tiotropium in 26% and long-acting β2-agonists in 22%. The likelihood of misclassification increased with overweight/obesity (odds ratio (OR) 2.66; 95% CI 1.50 to 4.70) and self-reported allergic rhinitis/hay fever (OR 1.72; 95% CI 1.13 to 2.64) after adjustment for age, gender, and smoking.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptom-based diagnosis of COPD in primary care is unreliable, especially if patients are overweight, so diagnostic spirometry is essential to avoid inappropriate management.

摘要

目的

评估澳大利亚初级医疗中慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的误诊情况。

方法

在澳大利亚一个州的31家(19%)医疗机构中开展了一项横断面研究。341例COPD患者(数据库诊断或正在使用噻托溴铵且经全科医生确认)完成了肺功能测定和问卷调查。采用多水平混合效应逻辑回归分析误诊的预测因素,该分析考虑了医疗机构层面的聚类效应。

结果

107例(31%)患者不存在COPD的肺功能测定确诊情况(1秒用力呼气容积/用力肺活量(FEV1/FVC)比值<0.7);60例(56%)肺功能正常,7例(7%)流量-容积曲线呈扇形且FEV1<预测值的80%,40例(37%)存在限制(FVC<预测值的80%)。在107例误诊患者中,使用的支气管扩张剂为噻托溴铵的占26%,长效β2受体激动剂的占22%。在对年龄、性别和吸烟情况进行校正后,超重/肥胖(比值比(OR)2.66;95%置信区间1.50至4.70)和自我报告的过敏性鼻炎/花粉症(OR 1.72;95%置信区间1.13至2.64)会增加误诊的可能性。

结论

在初级医疗中基于症状诊断COPD不可靠,尤其是对于超重患者,因此诊断性肺功能测定对于避免不恰当的治疗至关重要。

相似文献

1
Factors associated with misdiagnosis of COPD in primary care.基层医疗中慢性阻塞性肺疾病误诊的相关因素。
Prim Care Respir J. 2011 Dec;20(4):396-402. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2011.00039.
2
Factors associated with inadequate diagnosis of COPD: On-Sint cohort analysis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)诊断不足的相关因素:On-Sint队列分析。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 May 18;10:961-7. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S79547. eCollection 2015.
3
Efficacy and safety of nebulized formoterol as add-on therapy in COPD patients receiving maintenance tiotropium bromide: Results from a 6-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial.雾化吸入福莫特罗作为接受噻托溴铵维持治疗的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者附加治疗的疗效和安全性:一项为期6周的随机、安慰剂对照临床试验结果
Drugs. 2009 Jun 18;69(9):1205-16. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200969090-00005.
4
Comparable spirometric efficacy of tiotropium compared with salmeterol plus fluticasone in patients with COPD: a pilot study.噻托溴铵与沙美特罗加氟替卡松治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的肺量计疗效比较:一项初步研究。
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2008;21(1):20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2006.10.001. Epub 2006 Oct 13.
5
[Bronchodilator efficacy of combined salmeterol and tiotropium in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].沙美特罗与噻托溴铵联合使用对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的支气管扩张疗效
Arch Bronconeumol. 2005 Mar;41(3):130-4. doi: 10.1016/s1579-2129(06)60413-8.
6
Bronchodilator efficacy of tiotropium in patients with mild to moderate COPD.噻托溴铵对轻至中度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的支气管扩张疗效。
Prim Care Respir J. 2008 Sep;17(3):169-75. doi: 10.3132/pcrj.2008.00037.
7
Long-acting beta2-agonist in addition to tiotropium versus either tiotropium or long-acting beta2-agonist alone for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.长效β2受体激动剂联合噻托溴铵与单独使用噻托溴铵或长效β2受体激动剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 22;2015(10):CD008989. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008989.pub3.
8
Misdiagnosis of COPD and asthma in primary care patients 40 years of age and over.40岁及以上初级保健患者中慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和哮喘的误诊情况。
J Asthma. 2006 Jan-Feb;43(1):75-80. doi: 10.1080/02770900500448738.
9
Efficacy and safety of once-daily QVA149 compared with the free combination of once-daily tiotropium plus twice-daily formoterol in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD (QUANTIFY): a randomised, non-inferiority study.每日一次的QVA149与每日一次的噻托溴铵加每日两次的福莫特罗自由联合用药相比治疗中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疗效和安全性(QUANTIFY):一项随机、非劣效性研究
Thorax. 2015 Apr;70(4):311-9. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-206345. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
10
Combined Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second and Forced Vital Capacity Bronchodilator Response, Exacerbations, and Mortality in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.一秒用力呼气容积与用力肺活量的支气管扩张剂反应、慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重和死亡率的关系。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Jul;16(7):826-835. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201809-601OC.

引用本文的文献

1
A service evaluation following the implementation of computer guided consultation software to support primary care reviews for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.在实施计算机辅助咨询软件以支持慢性阻塞性肺疾病初级保健评估之后进行的服务评估。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2025 Mar 11;35(1):12. doi: 10.1038/s41533-025-00421-1.
2
Access to Treatment for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the Americas: A Call for Action. A Joint Perspective from the Brazilian Thoracic Society, Canadian Thoracic Society, Latin American Thoracic Society, and the American Thoracic Society.美洲慢性阻塞性肺疾病的治疗可及性:行动呼吁。巴西胸科学会、加拿大胸科学会、拉丁美洲胸科学会和美国胸科学会的联合观点。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Nov;21(11):1463-1470. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202404-386FR.
3
Climate-conscious inhaler prescribing for family physicians.家庭医生的气候意识型吸入器处方。
Can Fam Physician. 2024 Jun;70(6):381-387. doi: 10.46747/cfp.7006381.
4
Using Machine Learning with Impulse Oscillometry Data to Develop a Predictive Model for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma.使用机器学习结合脉冲振荡法数据来开发慢性阻塞性肺疾病和哮喘的预测模型。
J Pers Med. 2024 Apr 9;14(4):398. doi: 10.3390/jpm14040398.
5
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment: A Meta-Analysis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的过度诊断与过度治疗:一项荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 8;12(22):6978. doi: 10.3390/jcm12226978.
6
Implementing an Evidence-Based COPD Hospital Discharge Protocol: A Narrative Review and Expert Recommendations.实施基于证据的 COPD 医院出院方案:叙述性综述和专家建议。
Adv Ther. 2023 Oct;40(10):4236-4263. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02609-8. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
7
Undiagnosed and 'overdiagnosed' COPD using postbronchodilator spirometry in primary healthcare settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在基层医疗环境中使用支气管扩张剂后肺量测定法诊断和“过度诊断” COPD:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2023 Apr;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001478.
8
Identifying airway obstruction in primary care: is there a role for physiotherapists?在初级保健中识别气道阻塞:物理治疗师是否有作用?
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Dec 14;23(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01944-z.
9
Community-Based Approach to Assess Obstructive Respiratory Diseases and Risk in Urban African American Churches.以社区为基础的方法评估城市非裔美国教堂中的阻塞性呼吸道疾病和风险。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2023 Apr;25(2):389-397. doi: 10.1007/s10903-022-01405-w. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
10
Airspace Dimension Assessment with Nanoparticles (AiDA) in Comparison to Established Pulmonary Function Tests.纳米颗粒的气道空间评估(AiDA)与已建立的肺功能测试的比较。
Int J Nanomedicine. 2022 Jun 25;17:2777-2790. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S360271. eCollection 2022.