• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过选择性撤销氯沙坦的管理性预先授权要求来改变血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的处方行为。

Modifying prescribing behaviour of angiotensin receptor blockers by selectively rescinding managerial prior authorization requirements for losartan.

机构信息

The Center for the Study of Rationality, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Dec;72(6):997-1001. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04044.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04044.x
PMID:21689138
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3244650/
Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate whether rescinding the prior authorization (PA) requirement (managerial pre-approval) for losartan in an health maintenance organization (HMO) could reduce prescribing of the more expensive angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs).

METHODS

HMO physicians were notified that losartan would no longer require PA, and appropriate changes were made to the electronic prescribing computer program. The monthly distribution by drug of the number of prescriptions for ARBs dispensed for new patients was calculated before and after the policy change from data captured from electronic records. The proportion of patients (percentage and 95% confidence interval) treated with losartan who met the criteria for treatment with ARBs (hypertension or cardiac insufficiency in patients who have developed adverse effects in response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or macroproteinuria) during the first month after the PA requirement was rescinded was calculated.

RESULTS

The total number of PA requests for ARBs declined by 48.6% from 961 in December 2008, the month before the policy change, to 494 the following January, rising again to 651 during January 2010. Prescription incidence changed from 121 to 255 patients treated per month (114% increase) for losartan, from 15 to 16 (6.7% increase) for candesartan, and from 89 to 71 (20.2% decrease) for valsartan. The duration of effect for decrease in ARB requests for the more expensive drugs was approximately 1 year. Only 23.3% (95% confidence interval 18.1-28.4) of patients receiving losartan met the criteria for receiving ARBs.

CONCLUSIONS

Rescinding the PA requirement for this drug alone was an effective limited-duration strategy for reduction of prescription of relatively expensive drugs.

摘要

目的

评估在健康维护组织(HMO)中取消氯沙坦的事先授权(PA)要求(管理性预批准)是否可以减少更昂贵的血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)的处方。

方法

通知 HMO 医生氯沙坦不再需要 PA,并且对电子处方计算机程序进行了适当的更改。从电子记录中捕获的数据,计算政策变更前后新患者开具的 ARB 处方数量的每月药物分布。取消 PA 要求后第一个月内,符合用 ARB 治疗标准(对血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂有不良反应或巨蛋白尿的高血压或心功能不全患者)的接受氯沙坦治疗的患者比例(百分比和 95%置信区间)。

结果

ARB 的 PA 请求总数从政策变更前的 2008 年 12 月的 961 例下降了 48.6%,至次年 1 月的 494 例,然后在 2010 年 1 月再次上升至 651 例。氯沙坦的处方发生率从每月 121 例增至 255 例(增加 114%),坎地沙坦从每月 15 例增至 16 例(增加 6.7%),缬沙坦从每月 89 例降至 71 例(减少 20.2%)。对于更昂贵药物的 ARB 请求减少的效果持续时间约为 1 年。仅 23.3%(95%置信区间 18.1-28.4)的接受氯沙坦治疗的患者符合接受 ARB 的标准。

结论

单独取消该药物的 PA 要求是减少相对昂贵药物处方的有效限时策略。

相似文献

1
Modifying prescribing behaviour of angiotensin receptor blockers by selectively rescinding managerial prior authorization requirements for losartan.通过选择性撤销氯沙坦的管理性预先授权要求来改变血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的处方行为。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Dec;72(6):997-1001. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04044.x.
2
Impact of delisting ARBs, apart from losartan, on ARB utilisation patterns in Denmark: implications for other countries.停用除氯沙坦以外的 ARB 类药物对丹麦 ARB 类药物使用模式的影响:对其他国家的启示。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Dec;11(6):677-85. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0059-4.
3
Revealed Opportunism: How Physicians "Game" Prior Authorization Protocols Until They Are Rescinded.揭示的机会主义:医生如何“操纵”预先授权协议直至其被撤销。
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2016 Sep;9(6):304-311.
4
Measures to improve angiotensin receptor blocker prescribing efficiency in the UK: findings and implications.提高英国血管紧张素受体阻滞剂处方效率的措施:发现和启示。
J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Jan;3(1):41-51. doi: 10.2217/cer.13.83.
5
Impact of the Commercialization of Three Generic Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers on Adverse Events in Quebec, Canada: A Population-Based Time Series Analysis.三种通用型血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂商业化对加拿大魁北克不良事件的影响:基于人群的时间序列分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Oct;10(10). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003891.
6
Influence of multiple initiatives in Sweden to enhance ARB prescribing efficiency following generic losartan; findings and implications for other countries.瑞典多项举措对增强血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)处方效率的影响:氯沙坦通用名药物之后的发现及对其他国家的启示。
Int J Clin Pract. 2013 Sep;67(9):853-62. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12130. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
7
Influence of lifting prescribing restrictions for losartan on subsequent sartan utilization patterns in Austria: implications for other countries.奥地利取消氯沙坦处方限制对后续沙坦类药物使用模式的影响:对其他国家的启示。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012 Dec;12(6):809-19. doi: 10.1586/erp.12.71.
8
Clinical pharmacokinetics of angiotensin II (AT1) receptor blockers in hypertension.血管紧张素II(AT1)受体阻滞剂在高血压治疗中的临床药代动力学
J Hum Hypertens. 2000 Apr;14 Suppl 1:S73-86. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000991.
9
Angiotensin II receptor antagonists and heart failure: angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors remain the first-line option.血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂与心力衰竭:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂仍是一线选择。
Prescrire Int. 2005 Oct;14(79):180-6.
10
A retrospective study of the effects of angiotensin receptor blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in diabetic nephropathy.一项关于血管紧张素受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂对糖尿病肾病影响的回顾性研究。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2015 Mar-Apr;47(2):148-52. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.153420.

引用本文的文献

1
Revealed Opportunism: How Physicians "Game" Prior Authorization Protocols Until They Are Rescinded.揭示的机会主义:医生如何“操纵”预先授权协议直至其被撤销。
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2016 Sep;9(6):304-311.
2
Practice characteristics and prior authorization costs: secondary analysis of data collected by SALT-Net in 9 central New York primary care practices.执业特征与预先授权成本:对纽约州中部9家初级保健机构通过SALT-Net收集的数据进行的二次分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Mar 6;14:109. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-109.
3
Two cheers or three for treatment guidelines? Nudging prescribers in right directions.为治疗指南欢呼两声还是三声?将开处方者推向正确方向。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Dec;72(6):869-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04122.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Blood pressure lowering efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers for primary hypertension.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂对原发性高血压的降压疗效。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;2008(4):CD003822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003822.pub2.
2
Impact of Medicaid prior authorization on angiotensin-receptor blockers: can policy promote rational prescribing?医疗补助计划事先授权对血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的影响:政策能否促进合理用药?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 May-Jun;26(3):800-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.800.
3
Benefits and risks of increasing restrictions on access to costly drugs in Medicaid.医疗补助计划中增加获取高价药品限制的益处与风险
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jan-Feb;23(1):135-46. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.1.135.
4
Analysis of a prescription drug prior authorization program in a Medicaid health maintenance organization.对医疗补助健康维护组织中一种处方药预先授权程序的分析。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2003 Jan-Feb;9(1):36-44. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2003.9.1.36.
5
Utilization management in a large managed behavioral health organization.
Psychiatr Serv. 2000 May;51(5):621-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.51.5.621.