Department of Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington, USA.
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Mar;14(3):374-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02614.x.
It is often thought that practice patterns are different in private (PP) vs university hospital (UH) settings. We aimed to describe the impact of practice environment on the type of laparoscopic colectomy procedures performed by graduating colorectal surgeons.
A review was carried out of prospectively gathered self-reported questionnaire data. Graduates of American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons' (ASCRS)-approved colorectal residencies from 2004 to 2008 underwent an on-line survey, developed by the ASCRS Young Surgeons' Committee.
About 177 (52%) of 342 graduates surveyed responded. Practice setting data were available for 157 (89%) surgeons. Gender, geographical location and age were similar in both cohorts. PP surgeons utilized a laparoscopic approach more often for rectal cancer (37% vs 19%; P=0.003). There was no significant difference in the rate of laparoscopic surgery in colon cancer, diverticular disease, inflammatory bowel disease, Clostridium difficile or emergency surgery. PP surgeons operated more often with a partner (43% vs 8%) or surgical assistant (13% vs 4%; both P<0.001), while UH surgeons had a colorectal resident (10% vs 21%) or general surgery resident (15% vs 55%; both P<0.001). Impediments to performing laparoscopic surgery for PP surgeons included a perceived lack of hospital equipment (33% vs 20%) and support (29% vs 17%; both P<0.05). Perception of personal experience, access to trained assistants, financial reimbursement, length of surgery and patient availability were equivalent in both groups.
While differences such as type of assistant and impediments to laparoscopic utilization exist between PP- and UH-based practices, early laparoscopic practice patterns remain similar. PP surgeons more frequently perform laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer and with hand-assistance. Despite differences, newly trained colorectal surgeons in both settings utilize and require laparoscopic skills.
人们普遍认为,私人(PP)和大学医院(UH)的实践模式有所不同。我们旨在描述实践环境对毕业的结直肠外科医生所进行的腹腔镜结肠切除术类型的影响。
对美国结直肠外科医师学会(ASCRS)批准的结直肠住院医师从 2004 年至 2008 年进行的前瞻性自我报告问卷调查数据进行了回顾。由 ASCRS 年轻外科医生委员会开发的在线调查,对该学会的毕业生进行了调查。
在接受调查的 342 名毕业生中,约有 177 名(52%)做出了回应。有 157 名(89%)外科医生提供了实践环境数据。两组的性别、地理位置和年龄相似。PP 外科医生对直肠癌(37%比 19%;P=0.003)更常采用腹腔镜方法。在结肠癌、憩室病、炎症性肠病、艰难梭菌或急症手术中,腹腔镜手术的比例没有显著差异。PP 外科医生更常与伙伴(43%比 8%)或手术助手(13%比 4%;均 P<0.001)一起进行手术,而 UH 外科医生有结直肠住院医师(10%比 21%)或普通外科住院医师(15%比 55%;均 P<0.001)。PP 外科医生进行腹腔镜手术的障碍包括医院设备(33%比 20%)和支持(29%比 17%;均 P<0.05)不足。两组之间对个人经验、接受培训的助手的获取、财务补偿、手术时间和患者可用性的看法相似。
尽管 PP 和 UH 实践之间存在助手类型和腹腔镜使用障碍等差异,但早期腹腔镜手术模式仍相似。PP 外科医生更常进行腹腔镜直肠切除术和手辅助手术。尽管存在差异,但在这两种环境下,新培训的结直肠外科医生都需要和使用腹腔镜技能。