Suppr超能文献

手助腹腔镜手术可能是在学习曲线早期行全腹部结肠切除术的外科医生的有用工具。

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery may be a useful tool for surgeons early in the learning curve performing total abdominal colectomy.

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2010 Mar;12(3):199-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01777.x. Epub 2009 Jan 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated outcomes after hand-assisted (HALC) and straight laparoscopic (LC) techniques for the initial laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy (TAC) procedures performed by surgeons starting their laparoscopic careers.

METHOD

The first eight HALC cases of two surgeons performing TAC by this technique (Group A) were compared with the first (Group B) and last eight (Group C) TAC cases of three surgeons performing LC. Groups A and B were compared with a matched group of open total colectomy cases (Group D) and to the eight cases performed by an experienced surgeon (Group E). Demographics, intra-operative and postoperative outcomes including operation time, morbidity, conversion and readmission rates and length of hospital stay (LOS) were compared using Wilcoxon or Chi-squared tests.

RESULTS

Demographics of the patients were similar. Groups A, B C and E had similar operating time (P = 0.10) which was significantly longer than Group D (P < 0.0001). Morbidity (P = 0.75) and readmission rates were similar (P = 0.89). Conversion rate was significantly higher for Group B (Group B: 41.7%vs Group A: 0%, P = 0.008), in the early period. LOS was comparable between minimally invasive groups but significantly shorter than open surgery group (P = 0.0005). For Groups A and C, operating time (P = 0.55), conversion rate (P = 0.11), morbidity (P = 0.83) and LOS (P = 0.12) were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy may be associated with a significantly shorter learning curve for TAC as results are better than early LC and comparable with LC performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons. It may be a better option for surgeons early in their laparoscopic career.

摘要

目的

我们评估了由刚开始腹腔镜职业生涯的外科医生进行的手辅助(HALC)和直接腹腔镜(LC)技术治疗初次腹腔镜全结肠切除术(TAC)的手术结果。

方法

比较了两位外科医生使用该技术进行 TAC 的前 8 例 HALC 病例(A 组)与三位外科医生进行 LC 的前 8 例(B 组)和最后 8 例(C 组)TAC 病例。A 组和 B 组与一组接受开放性全结肠切除术的病例(D 组)以及 8 例由经验丰富的外科医生进行的手术(E 组)进行了比较。比较了各组的人口统计学、术中及术后结果,包括手术时间、发病率、转化率和再入院率以及住院时间(LOS),使用 Wilcoxon 或卡方检验进行比较。

结果

患者的人口统计学特征相似。A、B、C 和 E 组的手术时间相似(P = 0.10),显著长于 D 组(P < 0.0001)。发病率(P = 0.75)和再入院率相似(P = 0.89)。B 组的转化率明显更高(B 组:41.7%比 A 组:0%,P = 0.008),处于早期阶段。微创组之间的 LOS 相当,但明显短于开放手术组(P = 0.0005)。对于 A 组和 C 组,手术时间(P = 0.55)、转化率(P = 0.11)、发病率(P = 0.83)和 LOS(P = 0.12)相似。

结论

手辅助腹腔镜结肠切除术与 TAC 的学习曲线明显缩短相关,结果优于早期 LC,与经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生进行的 LC 相当。对于腹腔镜职业生涯早期的外科医生来说,它可能是一个更好的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验