• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种不同刷头设计的电动牙刷的牙菌斑清除效果

Plaque removal efficacy of two electric toothbrushes with different brush head designs.

作者信息

Sharma N C, Qaqish J G, Galustians H J, Goyal C R, Cugini M A, Thompson M C, Warren P R

机构信息

BioSci Research Canada Ltd., 6245 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, Ontario L5N 1A4, Canada.

出版信息

J Dent. 2005 Jun;33 Suppl 1:17-21.

PMID:16208799
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the safety and plaque removal efficacy of two electric toothbrushes, one a rechargeable oscillating/pulsating toothbrush with a small round brush head (Oral-B ProfessionalCare 7000; PC 7000), the other a battery-operated toothbrush with a dual moving brush head (Crest SpinBrush Pro; SBP).

METHODS

The study had a randomised, examiner-blind, two-arm crossover design. All subjects received an oral prophylaxis and used both toothbrushes on alternating days for a two-week practice period. After abstaining from all oral hygiene procedures for 23-25 hours, subjects received an oral tissue examination and those with pre-brushing whole mouth mean plaque scores > or = 0.60 measured by the Rustogi et al. Modified Navy Plaque Index were randomly assigned to treatment sequence. Subjects brushed with their assigned toothbrush for 2 minutes using a commercially available dentifrice. Oral tissues were then re-examined and post-brushing plaque scores recorded. After a brief washout period, the above procedures were repeated with the alternate toothbrush. One examiner, blinded to the treatment sequence, performed all clinical measurements.

RESULTS

A total of 70 subjects (24 males and 46 females) were enrolled and completed the study. Each toothbrush was found to be safe and significantly reduced plaque levels after a single brushing. The PC 7000 was significantly more effective in plaque removal than the SBP at all tooth areas, reducing whole mouth plaque by 61% versus 58% and plaque from approximal surfaces by 69% versus 65%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The action of the oscillating/pulsating toothbrush with a small round brush head, Oral-B ProfessionalCare 7000, is more effective in plaque removal than the battery-operated Crest SpinBrush Pro toothbrush with a larger dual moving brush head.

摘要

目的

比较两种电动牙刷的安全性和去除牙菌斑功效,一种是配有小圆形刷头的可充电振荡/脉动牙刷(欧乐-B专业护理7000;PC 7000),另一种是配有双活动刷头的电池驱动牙刷(佳洁士旋转刷头专业版;SBP)。

方法

本研究采用随机、检查者盲法、双臂交叉设计。所有受试者均接受了口腔预防治疗,并在两周的练习期内隔天使用两种牙刷。在停止所有口腔卫生程序23 - 25小时后,对受试者进行口腔组织检查,那些刷牙前全口平均牙菌斑评分≥0.60(采用Rustogi等人改良海军牙菌斑指数测量)的受试者被随机分配治疗顺序。受试者使用市售牙膏用指定的牙刷刷牙2分钟。然后再次检查口腔组织并记录刷牙后的牙菌斑评分。经过短暂的洗脱期后,用另一种牙刷重复上述程序。一名对治疗顺序不知情的检查者进行所有临床测量。

结果

共有70名受试者(24名男性和46名女性)入组并完成研究。发现每种牙刷都安全,且单次刷牙后能显著降低牙菌斑水平。在所有牙齿区域,PC 7000去除牙菌斑的效果均显著优于SBP,全口牙菌斑减少率分别为61%和58%,邻面牙菌斑减少率分别为69%和65%。

结论

配有小圆形刷头的振荡/脉动牙刷欧乐-B专业护理7000在去除牙菌斑方面比配有较大双活动刷头的电池驱动佳洁士旋转刷头专业版牙刷更有效。

相似文献

1
Plaque removal efficacy of two electric toothbrushes with different brush head designs.两种不同刷头设计的电动牙刷的牙菌斑清除效果
J Dent. 2005 Jun;33 Suppl 1:17-21.
2
Plaque removal efficacy of two electric toothbrushes with different brush head designs.两种不同刷头设计的电动牙刷的牙菌斑清除效果
J Dent. 2005 Jun;33S1:17-21.
3
Single-use plaque removal efficacy of three power toothbrushes.三款电动牙刷的一次性牙菌斑清除效果
J Dent. 2005 Jun;33 Suppl 1:11-5.
4
Plaque removal efficacy of a novel manual toothbrush with MicroPulse bristles and an advanced split-head design.一款具有微脉冲刷毛和先进分体刷头设计的新型手动牙刷的牙菌斑清除功效。
J Clin Dent. 2007;18(2):49-54.
5
A comparison of the plaque removal efficacy of two power toothbrushes: Oral-b Professional Care Series versus Sonicare Elite.两款电动牙刷的菌斑清除效果比较:欧乐-B专业护理系列与飞利浦声波震动牙刷精英版
Int Dent J. 2005 Jun;55(3):151-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2005.tb00312.x.
6
Correlations between two plaque indices in assessment of toothbrush effectiveness.两种牙菌斑指数在评估牙刷效果中的相关性。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006 Nov 1;7(5):1-9.
7
Single-use plaque removal efficacy of three power toothbrushes.三款电动牙刷的一次性牙菌斑清除效果
J Dent. 2005 Jun;33S1:11-15.
8
Clinical evaluations of plaque removal efficacy: an advanced rotating-oscillating power toothbrush versus a sonic toothbrush.牙菌斑清除效果的临床评估:一款先进的旋转振荡式电动牙刷与一款声波牙刷的对比
J Clin Dent. 2007;18(4):106-11.
9
The relative effectiveness of six powered toothbrushes for dental plaque removal.六种电动牙刷在去除牙菌斑方面的相对有效性。
J Clin Dent. 2002;13(5):198-202.
10
Three-month assessment of safety and efficacy of two electric toothbrushes.两款电动牙刷的安全性与有效性的三个月评估
J Dent. 2005 Jun;33 Suppl 1:23-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of photobiomodulation on dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized controlled double-blind clinical trial.光生物调节对牙本质敏感的影响:一项随机对照双盲临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jan 24;29(1):84. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06149-z.
2
Comparison of Three types of Tooth Brushes on Plaque and Gingival Indices: A Randomized Clinical Trial.三种牙刷对菌斑和牙龈指数影响的比较:一项随机临床试验
Open Dent J. 2017 Feb 28;11:126-132. doi: 10.2174/1874210601711010126. eCollection 2017.
3
Efficacy of an electric toothbrush on plaque control compared to two manual toothbrushes.
电动牙刷与两把手动牙刷在菌斑控制方面的效果比较。
Int Dent J. 2011 Jun;61(3):131-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2011.00029.x.