My 21 years with the Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, with observations on editors, editorial boards, authors and reviewers.
作者信息
Young Simon N
出版信息
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2011 Jul;36(4):E30-4. doi: 10.1503/jpn.110044.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
My 21 years with the Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, with observations on editors, editorial boards, authors and reviewers.我在《精神病学与神经科学杂志》工作的21年，以及对编辑、编辑委员会、作者和审稿人的观察。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2011 Jul;36(4):E30-4. doi: 10.1503/jpn.110044.
2
Behind the curtain of : The practice of a medical journal and a call for reviewers.幕后：医学期刊的实践与审稿人的呼吁。
Australas Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;32(5):411-414. doi: 10.1177/10398562241265261. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
3
Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.医学期刊编辑对生物医学期刊同行评审员角色和任务的看法：一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 24;9(11):e033421. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033421.
4
Nursing Journal Policies on Disclosure and Management of Conflicts of Interest.护理期刊利益冲突披露和管理政策。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2020 Nov;52(6):680-687. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12605. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
5
Journal editors' perspectives on the communication practices in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.期刊编辑对生物医学期刊交流实践的看法：一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 13;10(8):e035600. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035600.
6
The role of editors, reviewers and authors in improving the journal quality.编辑、审稿人和作者在提高期刊质量方面的作用。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2011 Jan;12(1):1-2. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3283426332.
7
The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors.评估随机对照试验的同行评审员的最重要任务，与期刊编辑最常要求的任务并不一致。
BMC Med. 2015 Jul 3;13:158. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0395-3.
8
Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.眼科期刊利益冲突披露政策调查。
Ophthalmology. 2009 Jun;116(6):1093-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.053. Epub 2009 Apr 19.
9
The continuing evolution of the Journal of Neurophysiology: 2018 update.《神经生理学杂志》的持续发展：2018年更新
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Mar 1;119(3):765-766. doi: 10.1152/jn.00030.2018. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
10
Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals.同行评审中的盲审：护理期刊审稿人的偏好
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Oct;64(2):131-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04816.x. Epub 2008 Sep 1.
本文引用的文献
1
On the path to global open access: a few more miles to go.迈向全球开放获取的道路：仍需努力前行。
PLoS Med. 2011 Mar;8(3):e1001014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001014. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
2
Towards open and equitable access to research and knowledge for development.促进开放和公平获取研究与知识，以实现发展。
PLoS Med. 2011 Mar;8(3):e1001016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001016. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
3
Scientific publishing. Open access gains support; fees and journal quality deter submissions.科学出版。开放获取获得支持；费用和期刊质量阻碍投稿。
Science. 2011 Jan 21;331(6015):273. doi: 10.1126/science.331.6015.273-a.
4
Bioanalytical inaccuracy: a threat to the integrity and efficiency of research.生物分析不准确：对研究的完整性和效率的一种威胁。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2010 Jan;35(1):3-6. doi: 10.1503/jpn.090171.
5
6
How to increase serotonin in the human brain without drugs.如何在不使用药物的情况下增加人类大脑中的血清素。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2007 Nov;32(6):394-9.
7
Why most published research findings are false.为何大多数已发表的研究结果是错误的。
PLoS Med. 2005 Aug;2(8):e124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124. Epub 2005 Aug 30.
8
Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do?低质量医学研究：期刊能做些什么？
JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2765-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2765.
Zotero 插件