Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, Hämeentie 11, PO Box 52, Turku FIN-20521, Finland.
Br J Cancer. 2011 Jul 12;105(2):255-62. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.223. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
Only 40-70% of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) with wild-type (WT) KRAS oncogene respond to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) antibody treatment. EGFR amplification has been suggested as an additional marker to predict the response. However, improved methods for bringing the EGFR analysis into routine laboratory are needed.
The material consisted of 80 patients with mCRC, 54 of them receiving anti-EGFR therapy. EGFR gene copy number (GCN) was analysed by automated silver in situ hybridisation (SISH). Immunohistochemical EGFR protein analysis was used to guide SISH assessment.
Clinical benefit was seen in 73% of high (≥ 4.0) EGFR GCN patients, in comparison with 59% of KRAS WT patients. Only 20% of low EGFR GCN patients responded to therapy. A high EGFR GCN number associated with longer progression-free survival (P<0.0001) and overall survival (P=0.004). Together with KRAS analysis, EGFR GCN identified the responsive patients to anti-EGFR therapy more accurately than either test alone. The clinical benefit rate of KRAS WT/high EGFR GCN tumours was 82%.
Our results show that automated EGFR SISH, in combination with KRAS mutation analysis, can be a useful and easily applicable technique in routine diagnostic practise for selecting patients for anti-EGFR therapy.
只有 40-70%的野生型(WT)KRAS 致癌基因转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)对抗表皮生长因子受体(anti-EGFR)抗体治疗有反应。已经提出 EGFR 扩增作为预测反应的另一个标志物。然而,需要改进将 EGFR 分析纳入常规实验室的方法。
该材料包括 80 名 mCRC 患者,其中 54 名接受了抗 EGFR 治疗。通过自动化银原位杂交(SISH)分析 EGFR 基因拷贝数(GCN)。免疫组化 EGFR 蛋白分析用于指导 SISH 评估。
在高(≥4.0)EGFR GCN 患者中,临床获益率为 73%,而 KRAS WT 患者为 59%。只有 20%的低 EGFR GCN 患者对治疗有反应。高 EGFR GCN 数量与无进展生存期(P<0.0001)和总生存期(P=0.004)延长相关。与 KRAS 分析相结合,EGFR GCN 比单独使用任何一种测试更准确地识别出对抗 EGFR 治疗有反应的患者。KRAS WT/高 EGFR GCN 肿瘤的临床获益率为 82%。
我们的结果表明,自动化 EGFR SISH 结合 KRAS 突变分析,可作为常规诊断实践中选择抗 EGFR 治疗患者的有用且易于应用的技术。