Suppr超能文献

深部颈脓肿:微生物病因分析及抗生素疗效评估。

Deep neck abscess: an analysis of microbial etiology and the effectiveness of antibiotics.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung;

出版信息

Infect Drug Resist. 2008;1:1-8. doi: 10.2147/idr.s3554. Epub 2008 Jul 7.

Abstract

The objective was to demonstrate the aerobic and anaerobic microbiology of deep neck space abscess and to analyze the coverage rate of different empiric antimicrobial agents. A retrospective review of hospitalized patients with deep neck abscess diagnosed at a tertiary-care, general hospital between April 2001 and October 2006. The study enrolled 100 patients. The bacterial cultures of 89 patients yielded positive results (89%). The predominant aerobes were viridans streptococci, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Staphylococcus aureus. The predominant anaerobes included species of Prevotella, Peptostreptococcus, and Bacteroides. Five different combinations of empiric antibiotics, namely regimen 1: penicillin G and clindamycin and gentamicin, regimen 2: ceftriaxone and clindamycin, regimen 3: ceftriaxone and metronidazole, regimen 4: cefuroxime and clindamycin, and regimen 5: penicillin and metronidazole, were compared using the antimicrobial susceptibility of 89 cases. The coverage rates of regimens 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 were 67.4%, 76.4%, 70.8%, 61.8%, and 16.9%, respectively. The coverage of regimen 5 was considerably worse than that of the other four regimens (p < 0.001). Regimen 2 was significantly better than regimen 4 (p < 0.001). Regimen 2 had better coverage than regimens 1 (p = 0.096) and 3 (p = 0.302), but the difference was not statistically significant. This study demonstrates the bacteriology of deep neck abscess and analyzes the coverage rate of different empiric antimicrobial agents. Regimens 1, 2, and 3 could be good candidates for empiric antibiotics. Pathogen-directed antimicrobial therapy should be adjusted after the culture results are obtained.

摘要

目的是展示深部颈间隙脓肿的需氧和厌氧微生物学,并分析不同经验性抗菌药物的覆盖范围。这是一项对 2001 年 4 月至 2006 年 10 月在一家三级保健综合医院住院的深部颈脓肿患者进行的回顾性研究。研究纳入了 100 名患者。89 名患者的细菌培养结果呈阳性(89%)。主要需氧菌为草绿色链球菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和金黄色葡萄球菌。主要厌氧菌包括普雷沃氏菌、消化链球菌和拟杆菌属。比较了 5 种不同经验性抗生素组合,即方案 1:青霉素 G、克林霉素和庆大霉素,方案 2:头孢曲松和克林霉素,方案 3:头孢曲松和甲硝唑,方案 4:头孢呋辛和克林霉素,以及方案 5:青霉素和甲硝唑,使用 89 例的抗菌药物敏感性比较。方案 1、2、3、4 和 5 的覆盖率分别为 67.4%、76.4%、70.8%、61.8%和 16.9%。方案 5 的覆盖范围明显劣于其他四种方案(p<0.001)。方案 2明显优于方案 4(p<0.001)。方案 2的覆盖范围优于方案 1(p=0.096)和 3(p=0.302),但差异无统计学意义。本研究展示了深部颈脓肿的细菌学,并分析了不同经验性抗菌药物的覆盖范围。方案 1、2 和 3 可以作为经验性抗生素的候选药物。在获得培养结果后,应调整针对病原体的抗菌治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4baf/3108716/6ec13b9c7d5f/idr-1-001f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验