Fung James, Lai Ching-Lung, Seto Wai-Kay, Yuen Man-Fung
Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Hepatol Int. 2011 Jun 22;5(4):868-875. doi: 10.1007/s12072-011-9288-5. eCollection 2011 Dec.
There has been increasing interest in noninvasive methods of assessing liver fibrosis over the last decade. The use of transient elastography in measuring liver stiffness has become the forefront of a wide range of noninvasive tools. Most of the other methods are based on measurements of biomarkers associated with fibrosis. There are several reasons for its wide acceptance, including the ease of performing a scan, the short procedure time, the results being immediately available on completion of the examination, and its reproducibility. For chronic hepatitis B (CHB), the cut-off values for F3 and F4 fibrosis range between 7.5-12.0 and 11.0-13.4 kPa, respectively, although the cut-offs may be slightly lower in those with normal ALT. In addition to measuring liver fibrosis, recent studies have demonstrated several other roles for transient elastography, including selecting patients who will benefit from antiviral therapy, monitoring response to antiviral therapy, and predicting long-term outcomes. However, there are limitations associated with transient elastography, including the confounding effects of inflammatory activity, and to a lesser extent, steatosis, on liver stiffness. There is also reduced accuracy observed in lower fibrosis stages (F0-F2). Furthermore, the incidences of failed and unreliable scan have been reported to be ~ 3 and 16%, respectively. Although liver biopsy can be avoided in an estimated 50-60% using transient elastography, in situations where liver stiffness measurement is nondiagnostic or inconsistent with the clinical picture, a biopsy is still recommended. Further studies are needed to consolidate the role of transient elastography in the management of CHB, and for incorporation of this method into current treatment guidelines.
在过去十年中,人们对评估肝纤维化的非侵入性方法的兴趣与日俱增。瞬时弹性成像技术在测量肝脏硬度方面的应用已成为众多非侵入性工具的前沿。其他大多数方法基于与纤维化相关的生物标志物测量。其被广泛接受有几个原因,包括扫描操作简便、检查过程时间短、检查完成后结果可立即获得以及可重复性。对于慢性乙型肝炎(CHB),F3和F4纤维化的临界值分别在7.5 - 12.0 kPa和11.0 - 13.4 kPa之间,尽管谷丙转氨酶(ALT)正常者的临界值可能略低。除了测量肝纤维化外,最近的研究还证明了瞬时弹性成像技术的其他几个作用,包括选择能从抗病毒治疗中获益的患者、监测抗病毒治疗的反应以及预测长期预后。然而,瞬时弹性成像技术存在局限性,包括炎症活动以及在较小程度上脂肪变性对肝脏硬度的混杂影响。在较低纤维化阶段(F0 - F2)也观察到准确性降低。此外,据报道扫描失败和不可靠的发生率分别约为3%和16%。尽管使用瞬时弹性成像技术估计可避免50 - 60%的肝活检,但在肝脏硬度测量无法诊断或与临床表现不一致的情况下,仍建议进行活检。需要进一步研究以巩固瞬时弹性成像技术在CHB管理中的作用,并将该方法纳入当前治疗指南。