• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

杰克逊引流管在作为隧道式胸腔导管(TPC)用于治疗恶性胸腔积液中的疗效。

The efficacy of Jackson drain in the application to be a tunnel pleural catheter (TPC) in the management of malignant pleural effusion.

作者信息

Tscheikuna Jamsak, Thomrongpairoj Preecha, Disayabutr Suppareurg

机构信息

Division of Respiratory Disease and Tuberculosis, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Jun;94(6):679-85.

PMID:21696075
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common clinical problem in patients with advanced cancer and portends a poor prognosis, which means survival of less than six months. In June 1997, the US-FDA approved an indwelling TPC with a one-way drainage valve to be used in the management of MPE. Although popularity of this TPC has increased over the past few years, the experience with this device remains limited in Thai patients. One of the reasons is its high cost.

OBJECTIVE

Assess the efficacy and the safety of customary indwelling TPC by using Jackson drain in the management of patients with symptomatic MPE.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Ten patients with symptomatic MPE were receiving these catheters (18 Fr Silicone catheters with 25 cm fenestrated length) to drain effusion via plastic vacuum bottles (250 ml) every other day or as needed to relieve dyspnea. The patient's dyspnic respiration, quality of life, and comfort during the catheter's application were quantified with a Borg score, the St. George Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (SGRQ), and the comfort's score, respectively. These parameters were recorded at initial (before insertion) and 2-week follow-up visit. Pain after 24 hours of each insertion was quantified by visual pain analogue scale (VPAS). Patients were followed until either death or catheter removal.

RESULTS

The Borg score, SGRQ, and comfort's score showed significant improvement at 2-week visit (p < 0.05). Mean VPAS was 2.44. There was no early (2-week) complication, but the catheters were obstructed in three patients (mean = 60 days) and slipped out in two (day 18, day 50).

CONCLUSION

This modified Jackson drain was effective in the treatment of MPE as a TPC without early complications.

摘要

背景

恶性胸腔积液(MPE)是晚期癌症患者常见的临床问题,预示预后不良,即生存期不足6个月。1997年6月,美国食品药品监督管理局(US-FDA)批准一种带有单向引流阀的留置胸腔穿刺导管(TPC)用于MPE的治疗。尽管在过去几年中这种TPC的使用有所增加,但在泰国患者中使用该装置的经验仍然有限。原因之一是其成本高昂。

目的

评估使用杰克逊引流管进行常规留置TPC治疗有症状MPE患者的疗效和安全性。

材料与方法

10例有症状的MPE患者接受这些导管(18F硅胶导管,开窗长度25cm),通过塑料真空瓶(250ml)每隔一天或根据需要引流胸腔积液以缓解呼吸困难。分别用Borg评分、圣乔治呼吸疾病问卷(SGRQ)和舒适度评分对患者在置管期间的呼吸困难、生活质量和舒适度进行量化。这些参数在初始(置管前)和2周随访时记录。每次置管24小时后的疼痛通过视觉模拟疼痛量表(VPAS)进行量化。对患者进行随访直至死亡或拔除导管。

结果

2周随访时Borg评分、SGRQ和舒适度评分均有显著改善(p<0.05)。平均VPAS为2.44。无早期(2周)并发症,但3例患者导管堵塞(平均60天),2例患者导管滑脱(第18天、第50天)。

结论

这种改良的杰克逊引流管作为TPC治疗MPE有效,且无早期并发症。

相似文献

1
The efficacy of Jackson drain in the application to be a tunnel pleural catheter (TPC) in the management of malignant pleural effusion.杰克逊引流管在作为隧道式胸腔导管(TPC)用于治疗恶性胸腔积液中的疗效。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Jun;94(6):679-85.
2
Use of a pleural implantable access system for the management of malignant pleural effusion: the Institut Curie experience.使用胸膜植入式通路系统治疗恶性胸腔积液:居里研究所的经验。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Oct;84(4):1367-70. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.04.037.
3
Home-management of malignant pleural effusion with an indwelling pleural catheter: ten years experience.留置胸腔导管在家中治疗恶性胸腔积液:十年经验。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;38(12):1161-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.08.021. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
4
Thoracoscopic talc versus tunneled pleural catheters for palliation of malignant pleural effusions.胸腔镜滑石粉与隧道式胸腔引流管治疗恶性胸腔积液的姑息疗效比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Oct;94(4):1053-7; discussion 1057-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.103. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
5
Malignant pleural effusion in the presence of trapped lung. Five-year experience of PleurX tunnelled catheters.存在肺陷闭情况下的恶性胸腔积液。PleurX隧道式导管的五年经验。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009 Dec;9(6):961-4. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.211516. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
6
[Using a pleural implantable access system for the management of malignant pleural effusions. Experience of Institut Curie].[使用胸膜植入式通路系统管理恶性胸腔积液。居里研究所的经验]
Rev Pneumol Clin. 2008 Feb;64(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pneumo.2008.06.008.
7
Successful use of indwelling tunneled catheters for the management of effusions in children with advanced cancer.留置隧道导管成功用于管理晚期癌症患儿的积液。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014 Jun;61(6):1007-12. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24902. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
8
Palliation and pleurodesis in malignant pleural effusion: the role for tunneled pleural catheters.恶性胸腔积液的姑息治疗和胸膜固定术:经皮胸腔引流管的作用。
J Thorac Oncol. 2011 Apr;6(4):762-7. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31820d614f.
9
Tunneled pleural catheter use for pleural palliation does not increase infection rate in patients with treatment-related immunosuppression.经皮胸膜腔导管用于胸膜姑息治疗不会增加治疗相关免疫抑制患者的感染率。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 May;26(5):1525-1531. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3989-9. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
10
Ambulatory intercostal drainage for the management of malignant pleural effusion: a single center experience.门诊肋间引流治疗恶性胸腔积液:单中心经验。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Dec;16(12):3482-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0691-2. Epub 2009 Sep 24.