• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省 6 家医院的传统和锐利安全装置。

Conventional and sharp safety devices in 6 hospitals in British Columbia, Canada.

机构信息

School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2011 Nov;39(9):738-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.12.004. Epub 2011 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2010.12.004
PMID:21696858
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reengineered sharp safety devices have been recommended to reduce occupational percutaneous injury risk in health care facilities. We conducted this study just over 1 year after passage of legislation requiring the use of sharp safety medical devices to assess the frequency of safety and conventional sharp device use and whether safety features were being activated to cover sharp points after safety devices were used and before disposal.

METHODS

Approximately equal numbers of sharps disposal containers from various wards in 6 nonprofit adult and pediatric British Columbia hospitals were audited by paired research assistants, wearing protective clothing.

RESULTS

In the 699 audited sharps containers, 7% (1,690/25,910) of all devices were conventional devices, specifically 2% (96/4,702) of all phlebotomy devices, 7% (1,240/17,705) of all syringes, and 10% (354/3,503) of all intravenous catheters. In addition, 94% (4,344/4,602) of all safety phlebotomy devices, 95% (2,955/3,119) of all safety intravenous devices, and 80% (13,050/16,420) of all safety syringes had been activated before disposal.

CONCLUSION

More than 1 year after legislation was passed mandating the use of sharp safety devices in British Columbia hospitals, the risk from sharps remains excessive because of the ongoing use of conventional sharp devices and nonactivation of safety devices.

摘要

背景

为了降低医疗机构职业性经皮损伤的风险,已推荐使用改良的安全锐器。在通过立法要求使用安全锐器装置 1 年多后,我们开展了这项研究,评估安全和常规锐器装置的使用频率,以及在使用安全装置后和丢弃前是否激活安全装置来覆盖锐器点。

方法

6 家不列颠哥伦比亚省非营利成人和儿科医院的各病房使用配对研究助理、穿着防护服来审核大约数量相等的锐器处理容器。

结果

在 699 个审核的锐器容器中,7%(1690/25910)的所有装置为常规装置,特别是 2%(96/4702)的所有采血装置、7%(1240/17705)的所有注射器和 10%(354/3503)的所有静脉导管。此外,94%(4344/4602)的所有安全采血装置、95%(2955/3119)的所有安全静脉装置和 80%(13/16420)的所有安全注射器在丢弃前已被激活。

结论

在不列颠哥伦比亚省医院通过立法要求使用安全锐器装置 1 年多后,锐器造成的风险仍然过高,因为仍在继续使用常规锐器装置且安全装置未被激活。

相似文献

1
Conventional and sharp safety devices in 6 hospitals in British Columbia, Canada.加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省 6 家医院的传统和锐利安全装置。
Am J Infect Control. 2011 Nov;39(9):738-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.12.004. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
2
Ongoing use of conventional devices and safety device activation rates in hospitals in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省医院中常规设备的持续使用情况和安全设备激活率。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2011 Mar;8(3):154-60. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2011.555258.
3
Provision and use of personal protective equipment and safety devices in the National Study to Prevent Blood Exposure in Paramedics.在预防护理人员血液暴露的全国性研究中个人防护装备和安全装置的提供与使用
Am J Infect Control. 2008 Dec;36(10):743-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.04.250. Epub 2008 Oct 3.
4
Disposal of sharps medical waste in the United States: impact of recommendations and regulations, 1987-2007.美国锐器医疗废物的处理:1987-2007 年建议和法规的影响。
Am J Infect Control. 2012 May;40(4):354-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.04.328. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
5
Provision and use of safety-engineered medical devices among home care and hospice nurses in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州家庭护理和临终关怀护士对安全工程医疗器械的供应和使用。
Am J Infect Control. 2010 Oct;38(8):636-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.01.017. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
6
A comprehensive approach to percutaneous injury prevention during phlebotomy: results of a multicenter study, 1993-1995.静脉穿刺期间预防经皮损伤的综合方法:1993 - 1995年多中心研究结果
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003 Feb;24(2):97-104. doi: 10.1086/502179.
7
Sharps safety devices.锐器安全装置
Health Devices. 2006 Sep;35(9):337-47.
8
How to evaluate sharp safety-engineered devices.如何评估具有锐器安全设计的设备。
Nurs Times. 2008;104(36):42-5.
9
[Safe equipment to prevent injuries in medical staff].[预防医护人员受伤的安全设备]
Med Pr. 2007;58(1):13-7.
10
Sharps injuries among employees of acute care hospitals in Massachusetts, 2002-2007.马萨诸塞州急性护理医院员工的锐器伤,2002-2007 年。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Jun;32(6):538-44. doi: 10.1086/660012.

引用本文的文献

1
Refocusing on work-based hazards for the anaesthesiologist in a post-pandemic era.在后疫情时代重新关注麻醉医生基于工作的危害。
BJA Open. 2023 Oct 25;8:100234. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2023.100234. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Waste audits in healthcare: A systematic review and description of best practices.医疗废物审计:系统评价及最佳实践描述。
Waste Manag Res. 2023 Jan;41(1):3-17. doi: 10.1177/0734242X221101531. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
3
Barriers to the Adoption of Safety-Engineered Needles Following a Regulatory Standard: Lessons Learned from Three Acute Care Hospitals.
Healthc Policy. 2015 Aug;11(1):90-101.
4
Evaluating the implementation of health and safety innovations under a regulatory context: a collective case study of Ontario's safer needle regulation.评估监管背景下的健康和安全创新的实施:安大略省更安全的针头法规的集体案例研究。
Implement Sci. 2013 Jan 22;8:9. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-9.