• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马萨诸塞州急性护理医院员工的锐器伤,2002-2007 年。

Sharps injuries among employees of acute care hospitals in Massachusetts, 2002-2007.

机构信息

Massachusetts Department of Public Health Occupational Health Surveillance Program, Boston, Massachusetts 02108, USA.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Jun;32(6):538-44. doi: 10.1086/660012.

DOI:10.1086/660012
PMID:21558765
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Sharps with engineered sharps injury protections (SESIPs) have been found to reduce risk of sharps injuries (SIs). We examined trends in SI rates among employees of acute care hospitals in Massachusetts, including the impact of SESIPs on SI trends during 2002-2007.

DESIGN

Prospective surveillance.

SETTING

Seventy-six acute care hospitals licensed by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health.

PARTICIPANTS

Employees of acute care hospitals who reported SIs to their employers.

METHODS

Data on SIs in acute care hospitals collected by the Massachusetts Sharps Injury Surveillance System were used to examine trends in SI rates over time by occupation, hospital size, and device. Negative binomial regression was used to assess trends.

RESULTS

During 2002-2007, 16,158 SIs among employees of 76 acute care hospitals were reported to the surveillance system. The annual SI rate decreased by 22%, with an annual decline of 4.7% (P < .001). Rates declined significantly among nurses (-7.2% per year; P < .001) but not among physicians (-0.9% per year; P = .553). SI rates associated with winged steel needles and hypodermic needles and syringes also declined significantly as the proportion of injuries involving devices with sharps injury prevention features increased during the same time period.

CONCLUSION

SI rates involving devices for which SESIPs are widely available and appear to be increasingly used have declined. The continued use of devices lacking SI protections for which SESIPs are available needs to be addressed. The extent to which injuries involving SESIPs are due to flaws in design or lack of experience and training must be examined.

摘要

目的

带有工程化锐器损伤防护(SESIP)的锐器已被发现可降低锐器伤(SI)的风险。我们研究了马萨诸塞州急性护理医院员工的 SI 发生率趋势,包括 SESIP 对 2002-2007 年 SI 趋势的影响。

设计

前瞻性监测。

地点

马萨诸塞州公共卫生部许可的 76 家急性护理医院。

参与者

向雇主报告 SI 的急性护理医院员工。

方法

使用马萨诸塞州锐器伤害监测系统收集的急性护理医院锐器伤害数据,按职业、医院规模和器械考察时间推移的 SI 发生率趋势。采用负二项回归评估趋势。

结果

2002-2007 年期间,向监测系统报告了 76 家急性护理医院的 16158 例员工 SI。SI 年发生率下降了 22%,每年下降 4.7%(P<.001)。护士的发生率显著下降(每年减少 7.2%;P<.001),而医生的发生率没有显著下降(每年减少 0.9%;P=.553)。与此同时,带有锐器损伤预防功能的器械导致的 SI 发生率也显著下降,其中包括带翼的钢针和皮下注射针和注射器。

结论

广泛应用 SESIP 且其使用量不断增加的器械导致的 SI 发生率有所下降。需要解决仍在使用缺乏 SI 防护的器械的问题。必须检查 SESIP 涉及的伤害是由于设计缺陷还是缺乏经验和培训所致。

相似文献

1
Sharps injuries among employees of acute care hospitals in Massachusetts, 2002-2007.马萨诸塞州急性护理医院员工的锐器伤,2002-2007 年。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Jun;32(6):538-44. doi: 10.1086/660012.
2
Device-specific risk of needlestick injury in Italian health care workers.意大利医护人员针刺伤的特定器械风险
JAMA. 1994;272(8):607-10.
3
Hospital work environments, nurse characteristics, and sharps injuries.医院工作环境、护士特征与锐器伤
Am J Infect Control. 2007 Jun;35(5):302-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.07.014.
4
Costs associated with sharps injuries in the Swedish health care setting and potential cost savings from needle-stick prevention devices with needle and syringe.瑞典医疗环境中锐器伤相关成本以及使用带针注射器的针刺预防装置可能节省的成本。
Scand J Infect Dis. 2009;41(4):296-302. doi: 10.1080/00365540902780232.
5
Sharps injuries among nurses in a Thai regional hospital: prevalence and risk factors.泰国一家地区医院护士的锐器伤:患病率及危险因素
Int J Occup Environ Med. 2011 Oct;2(4):215-23.
6
Epidemiology of needlestick and sharps injuries among professional Korean nurses.韩国职业护士针刺伤和锐器伤的流行病学研究
J Prof Nurs. 2006 Nov-Dec;22(6):359-66. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2006.10.003.
7
[Analysis of needlestick and sharps injuries among medical staff in upper first-class hospital].[上级甲等医院医务人员针刺伤与锐器伤情况分析]
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2013 Jan;31(1):41-4.
8
Using an intravenous catheter system to prevent needlestick injury.使用静脉导管系统预防针刺伤。
Nurs Stand. 2010;24(29):42-6. doi: 10.7748/ns2010.03.24.29.42.c7628.
9
Do protective devices prevent needlestick injuries among health care workers?防护装置能否预防医护人员发生针刺伤?
Am J Infect Control. 1995 Dec;23(6):344-51. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(95)90264-3.
10
Sharp-device injuries to hospital staff nurses in 4 countries.4个国家医院护士遭受锐器伤害的情况
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Apr;28(4):473-8. doi: 10.1086/513445. Epub 2007 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporal trends in occupational accidents involving exposure to biological material in Brazil, 2010 to 2016.2010年至2016年巴西涉及生物材料暴露的职业事故的时间趋势。
Rev Bras Med Trab. 2021 Apr 30;19(1):43-50. doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2021-565.
2
Time Trends of Percutaneous Injuries in Hospital Nurses: Evidence of the Interference between Effects of Adoption of Safety Devices and Organizational Factors.医院护士经皮损伤的时间趋势:安全装置采用效果与组织因素之间干扰的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 20;18(8):4371. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084371.
3
Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel.
用于预防医护人员因针头导致的经皮暴露损伤的装置。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 14;11(11):CD009740. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009740.pub3.
4
Risk of Sharps Injuries to Home Care Nurses and Aides: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.家庭护理护士和助手的锐器伤风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Nov;59(11):1072-1077. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001160.
5
Understanding sharps injuries in home healthcare: The Safe Home Care qualitative methods study to identify pathways for injury prevention.了解家庭医疗保健中的锐器伤:安全家庭护理定性方法研究以确定预防伤害的途径。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 11;15:359. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1673-x.
6
Understanding the hospital sharps injury reporting pathway.了解医院锐器伤报告流程。
Am J Ind Med. 2015 Mar;58(3):282-9. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22392. Epub 2014 Oct 10.