• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将美国国家卫生统计中心和新的世界卫生组织生长参照标准与来自 11 个低收入国家的数据进行比较,用于评估学龄儿童和青少年的生长状况。

A comparison of the National Center for Health Statistics and new World Health Organization growth references for school-age children and adolescents with the use of data from 11 low-income countries.

机构信息

Centre for Global Health and Human Development, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK.

出版信息

Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 Aug;94(2):571-7. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.008300. Epub 2011 Jun 22.

DOI:10.3945/ajcn.110.008300
PMID:21697076
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2007 new World Health Organization (WHO) growth references for children aged 5-19 y were introduced to replace the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) references.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the prevalence of stunting, wasting, and thinness estimated by the NCHS and WHO growth references.

DESIGN

NCHS and WHO height-for-age z scores were calculated with the use of cross-sectional data from 20,605 schoolchildren aged 5-17 y in 11 low-income countries. The differences in the percentage of stunted children were estimated for each year of age and sex. The z scores of body mass index-for-age and weight-for-height were calculated with the use of the WHO and NCHS references, respectively, to compare differences in the prevalence of thinness and wasting.

RESULTS

No systematic differences in mean z scores of height-for-age were observed between the WHO and NCHS growth references. However, z scores of height-for-age varied by sex and age, particularly during early adolescence. In children for whom weight-for-height could be calculated, the estimated prevalence of thinness (WHO reference) was consistently higher than the prevalence of wasting (NCHS reference) by as much as 9% in girls and 18% in boys.

CONCLUSIONS

In undernourished populations, the application of the WHO (2007) references may result in differences in the prevalence of stunting for each sex compared with results shown when the NCHS references are used as well as a higher estimated prevalence of thinness than of wasting. An awareness of these differences is important for comparative studies or the evaluation of programs. For school-age children and adolescents across all ranges of anthropometric status, the same growth references should be applied when such studies are undertaken.

摘要

背景

2007 年,世界卫生组织(WHO)推出了新的儿童生长标准(适用于 5-19 岁儿童),用以替代美国国家卫生统计中心(NCHS)的标准。

目的

本研究旨在比较使用 NCHS 和 WHO 生长标准估计的儿童生长迟缓、消瘦和消瘦的发生率。

设计

使用来自 11 个低收入国家的 20605 名 5-17 岁学龄儿童的横断面数据,计算 NCHS 和 WHO 的身高年龄 z 评分。分别使用 WHO 和 NCHS 标准计算体质指数年龄 z 评分和体重身高 z 评分,以比较消瘦和消瘦发生率的差异。

结果

WHO 和 NCHS 生长标准的身高年龄 z 评分均值无系统差异。然而,身高年龄 z 评分存在性别和年龄差异,尤其是在青春期早期。对于可以计算体重身高的儿童,消瘦的估计发生率(WHO 标准)始终高于消瘦的发生率(NCHS 标准),女孩高达 9%,男孩高达 18%。

结论

在营养不足的人群中,与使用 NCHS 标准相比,应用 WHO(2007 年)标准可能会导致男女生长迟缓的发生率存在差异,并且消瘦的估计发生率高于消瘦的发生率。了解这些差异对于比较研究或方案评估非常重要。对于所有体格发育状况的学龄儿童和青少年,在进行此类研究时,应使用相同的生长标准。

相似文献

1
A comparison of the National Center for Health Statistics and new World Health Organization growth references for school-age children and adolescents with the use of data from 11 low-income countries.将美国国家卫生统计中心和新的世界卫生组织生长参照标准与来自 11 个低收入国家的数据进行比较,用于评估学龄儿童和青少年的生长状况。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 Aug;94(2):571-7. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.008300. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
2
Variations in estimates of underweight, stunting, wasting, overweight and obesity in children from Argentina comparing three growth charts.三种生长图表比较阿根廷儿童消瘦、发育迟缓、消瘦、超重和肥胖估计值的差异。
Public Health Nutr. 2012 Nov;15(11):2086-90. doi: 10.1017/S136898001200095X. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
3
Height, weight and BMI percentiles and nutritional status relative to the international growth references among Pakistani school-aged children.巴基斯坦学龄儿童的身高、体重和 BMI 百分位与国际生长参考值的关系以及营养状况。
BMC Pediatr. 2012 Mar 19;12:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-31.
4
Factors Associated With Child Stunting, Wasting, and Underweight in 35 Low- and Middle-Income Countries.35 个中低收入国家与儿童发育迟缓、消瘦和体重不足相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e203386. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3386.
5
Stunting and 'overweight' in the WHO Child Growth Standards - malnutrition among children in a poor area of China.《世卫组织儿童生长标准中的发育迟缓与超重问题——中国贫困地区儿童的营养不良问题》
Public Health Nutr. 2009 Nov;12(11):1991-8. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009990796. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
6
Misclassification of stunting, underweight and wasting in children 0-5 years of South Asian and Dutch descent: ethnic-specific . WHO criteria.南亚裔和荷兰裔 0-5 岁儿童生长迟缓、消瘦和消瘦的分类错误:特定族群。世卫组织标准。
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Aug;23(12):2078-2087. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019004464. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
7
The National Center for Health Statistics reference and the growth of Indian adolescent boys.美国国家卫生统计中心参考标准与印度青少年男性的生长发育
Am J Clin Nutr. 2001 Aug;74(2):248-53. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/74.2.248.
8
[Differences in the prevalence of malnutrition resulting from using a national growth reference or an international growth reference].[使用国家生长参考标准或国际生长参考标准导致的营养不良患病率差异]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2005 Sep;18(3):157-62. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892005000800002.
9
Prevalence and socio-demographic correlates of stunting and thinness among Pakistani primary school children.巴基斯坦小学生发育迟缓与消瘦的流行情况及其社会人口学相关因素。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Oct 11;11:790. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-790.
10
The height-, weight- and BMI-for-age of preschool children from Nizhny Novgorod city, Russia, relative to the international growth references.俄罗斯下诺夫哥罗德市学龄前儿童的年龄别身高、体重和体重指数,与国际生长参考标准的比较。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Mar 17;16:274. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2946-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Waist Circumference Percentiles and Cut-Off Values for Obesity in a Large Sample of Students from 6 To 10 Years Old Of The São Paulo State, Brazil.巴西圣保罗州6至10岁学生大样本中肥胖的腰围百分位数及临界值
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020 May-Jun;114(3):530-537. doi: 10.36660/abc.20190043.