Medical Technology and Practice Patterns Institute, 4733 Bethesda Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
Kidney Int. 2011 Sep;80(6):663-9. doi: 10.1038/ki.2011.188. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
A randomized trial had suggested that high doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) might increase the risk of cardiovascular outcomes in predialysis diabetic patients. To evaluate this risk in diabetic patients receiving dialysis, we used data from 35,593 elderly Medicare patients on hemodialysis in the US Renal Data System of whom 19,034 were diabetic. A pooled logistic model was used to estimate the monthly probability of mortality and a composite cardiovascular end point. Inverse probability weighting was used to adjust for measured time-dependent confounding by indication, estimated separately for diabetic and non-diabetic cohorts. The adjusted 9-month mortality risk, significantly different between an ESA dose of 45,000 and 15,000 U/week, was 13% among diabetics and 5% among non-diabetics. In diabetic patients, the hazard ratio (HR) for more than 40,000 U/week was 1.32 for all-cause mortality and 1.26 for a composite end point of death and cardiovascular events compared with patients receiving 20,000 to 30,000 U/week. The corresponding HRs in non-diabetic patients were 1.06 and 1.10, respectively. A smaller effect of dose was found in non-diabetic patients. Thus, higher ESA doses, which are often necessary to achieve high hemoglobin levels, are not beneficial, and possibly harmful, to diabetic patients receiving dialysis. Our findings support a Food and Drug Administration advisory recommending that the lowest possible ESA dose be used to treat hemodialysis patients.
一项随机试验表明,高剂量促红细胞生成素刺激剂(ESA)可能会增加透析前糖尿病患者发生心血管结局的风险。为了评估接受透析的糖尿病患者的这种风险,我们使用了美国肾脏数据系统中 35593 名老年医疗保险透析患者的数据,其中 19034 名患者患有糖尿病。我们使用汇总逻辑模型来估计每月死亡率和复合心血管终点的概率。我们使用逆概率加权法来调整指示性的随时间变化的混杂因素,分别针对糖尿病和非糖尿病队列进行估计。ESA 剂量为 45000 和 15000 U/周之间的 9 个月死亡率调整风险差异在糖尿病患者中具有统计学意义(13%),而非糖尿病患者中则无统计学意义(5%)。在糖尿病患者中,与接受 20000 至 30000 U/周治疗的患者相比,每周接受超过 40000 U 的 ESA 治疗的全因死亡率和死亡与心血管事件复合终点的风险比(HR)分别为 1.32 和 1.26。非糖尿病患者的相应 HR 分别为 1.06 和 1.10。在非糖尿病患者中,剂量的影响较小。因此,对于接受透析的糖尿病患者,较高的 ESA 剂量(通常需要达到较高的血红蛋白水平)不仅无益,而且可能有害。我们的研究结果支持美国食品和药物管理局的建议,即应使用最低可能剂量的 ESA 来治疗血液透析患者。