Suppr超能文献

在不同曝光条件下,使用互补金属氧化物半导体(CMOS)和电荷耦合器件(CCD)数字X射线传感器以及传统的D和F速胶片检测邻面釉质龋损的空洞型或非空洞型病变。

Detection of cavitated or non-cavitated approximal enamel caries lesions using CMOS and CCD digital X-ray sensors and conventional D and F-speed films at different exposure conditions.

作者信息

Bottenberg Peter, Jacquet Wolfgang, Stachniss Vitus, Wellnitz Johann, Schulte Andreas G

机构信息

Dept. of Operative Dentistry, Free University of Brussels, Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Am J Dent. 2011 Apr;24(2):74-8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the ability of digital sensors (CMOS and CCD sensors) and D and F-speed films to detect cavitated and non-cavitated enamel caries lesions at different exposure conditions compared to a gold standard.

METHODS

100 extracted human molars and premolars were selected and mounted in a block between two neighboring teeth. Sensors or films were exposed with voltages of 60 or 70 kVp at varying times. Three observers assessed each approximal site independently. Lesion depth was rated according to an anatomical five-point scale (0 = no lesion to 4 = lesion reaching inner half of dentin). Serial sections of resin-embedded teeth were prepared. Gold-standard scores were established by consensus based on histological sectioning. A carious lesion was present at scores of 1 and higher. Statistical evaluation (sensitivity, specificity and receiver-operating curves) was based on caries-free surfaces and those presenting enamel caries (n=116).

RESULTS

The ROC curves had "area under the curve" values (Az) from 0.50 (F-speed, 70 kVp, 0.20 seconds) to 0.58 (CCD 60 kVp, 0.08 seconds). The detection percentage of cavitated lesions was generally higher (0-52%, depending on technique and observer) than that of non-cavitated lesions (3-32%). The CMOS sensor showed Az values comparable to the CCD sensors but required higher exposure times. There was no significant difference between 60 and 70 kVp.

摘要

目的

与金标准相比,确定数字传感器(CMOS和CCD传感器)以及D速和F速胶片在不同曝光条件下检测龋损和非龋损釉质龋病变的能力。

方法

选取100颗拔除的人类磨牙和前磨牙,将其固定在相邻两颗牙齿之间的一块组织中。传感器或胶片在60或70 kVp的电压下进行不同时间的曝光。三名观察者独立评估每个邻面部位。根据解剖学五点量表对病变深度进行评分(0 = 无病变至4 = 病变累及牙本质内半部分)。制备树脂包埋牙齿的连续切片。基于组织学切片通过共识确定金标准评分。评分1及以上表示存在龋损病变。基于无龋表面和存在釉质龋的表面(n = 116)进行统计评估(敏感性、特异性和受试者操作曲线)。

结果

ROC曲线的“曲线下面积”值(Az)范围为0.50(F速,70 kVp,0.20秒)至0.58(CCD,60 kVp,0.08秒)。龋损病变的检测率通常高于非龋损病变(0 - 52%,取决于技术和观察者)(3 - 32%)。CMOS传感器显示的Az值与CCD传感器相当,但需要更长的曝光时间。60和70 kVp之间无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验