Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, England.
Gastroenterology. 2011 Sep;141(3):909-917.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: One particularly important individual dynamic known to influence the experience of pain is neuroticism, of which little is known about in visceral pain research. Our aim was to study the relationship between neuroticism, psychophysiologic response, and brain processing of visceral pain.
Thirty-one healthy volunteers (15 male; age range, 22-38 years) participated in the study. The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire was used to assess neuroticism. Skin conductance level, pain ratings, and functional magnetic resonance imaging data were acquired during anticipation of pain and painful esophageal distention. The effect of neuroticism was assessed using correlation analysis.
There was a wide spread of neuroticism scores (range, 0-22) but no influence of neuroticism on skin conductance level and pain tolerance or pain ratings. However, a positive correlation between brain activity and neuroticism during anticipation was found in regions associated with emotional and cognitive pain processing, including the parahippocampus, insula, thalamus, and anterior cingulate cortex. These regions showed a negative correlation with neuroticism during pain (P < .001).
This study provides novel data suggesting higher neuroticism is associated with engagement of brain regions responsible for emotional and cognitive appraisal during anticipation of pain but reduced activity in these regions during pain. This may reflect a maladaptive mechanism in those with higher neuroticism that promotes overarousal during anticipation and avoidance coping during pain.
已知有一个特别重要的个体动态因素会影响疼痛体验,即神经质,但在内脏疼痛研究中,对其知之甚少。我们的目的是研究神经质、心理生理反应与内脏疼痛的大脑处理之间的关系。
31 名健康志愿者(15 名男性;年龄 22-38 岁)参与了这项研究。使用艾森克人格问卷评估神经质。在预期疼痛和食管扩张时采集皮肤电导率水平、疼痛评分和功能磁共振成像数据。使用相关分析评估神经质的影响。
神经质评分范围很广(0-22),但神经质对皮肤电导率水平和疼痛耐受力或疼痛评分没有影响。然而,在预期疼痛时发现,大脑活动与神经质之间存在正相关,与情感和认知疼痛处理相关的区域包括海马旁回、脑岛、丘脑和前扣带皮层。这些区域在疼痛期间与神经质呈负相关(P<0.001)。
这项研究提供了新的数据,表明较高的神经质与负责疼痛预期时情感和认知评估的大脑区域的参与有关,但在疼痛期间这些区域的活动减少。这可能反映了神经质较高的人在预期时过度兴奋和在疼痛时回避应对的一种适应不良机制。