• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肌病性多发性神经病的疲劳评估量表的最小(临床)重要差异。

Minimal (clinically) important differences for the Fatigue Assessment Scale in sarcoidosis.

机构信息

Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases (CoRPS), Department of Medical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2011 Sep;105(9):1388-95. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.05.004. Epub 2011 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2011.05.004
PMID:21700440
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The usefulness of any questionnaire in clinical management and research trials depends on its ability to indicate a likelihood of treatment success during follow-up. The Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) reflects a clinically relevant change score. The aim of this study was to estimate the MCID for the Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) in patients with sarcoidosis.

METHODS

Outpatients (n = 321) of the ild care team of the Department of Respiratory Medicine of the Maastricht University Medical Centre, The Netherlands, participated in this prospective follow-up study. Anchor-based and distribution-based methods were used to estimate the MCID. Based on the anchor Physical Quality of Life, a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) was obtained. The distribution-based methods consisted of the Effect Size and Standard Error Measurement (SEM).

RESULTS

The anchor-based MCID found with ROC was 3.5. The distribution-based methods showed that the corresponding change scores in the FAS for a small effect was 4.2. The SEM criterion was 3.6 points change in the FAS.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the anchor-based and distribution-based methods, the MCID is a 4-point difference on the FAS. This MCID can be used in the follow-up of fatigue (FAS) in clinical trials and in the management of individual sarcoidosis cases.

摘要

目的

任何问卷在临床管理和研究试验中的有用性都取决于其在随访期间指示治疗成功可能性的能力。最小临床重要差异(MCID)反映了临床相关的变化分数。本研究旨在估计肌痛评估量表(FAS)在结节病患者中的 MCID。

方法

荷兰马斯特里赫特大学医学中心呼吸医学部门的 ild 护理团队的 321 名门诊患者参加了这项前瞻性随访研究。使用基于锚点和基于分布的方法来估计 MCID。基于锚定物理生活质量,获得了接收器工作特征(ROC)。基于分布的方法包括效应大小和标准误差测量(SEM)。

结果

ROC 得出的基于锚点的 MCID 为 3.5。基于分布的方法表明,FAS 的小效应的相应变化分数为 4.2。SEM 标准为 FAS 变化 3.6 分。

结论

基于基于锚点和基于分布的方法,MCID 是 FAS 上的 4 分差异。该 MCID 可用于临床试验中疲劳(FAS)的随访以及个体结节病病例的管理。

相似文献

1
Minimal (clinically) important differences for the Fatigue Assessment Scale in sarcoidosis.肌病性多发性神经病的疲劳评估量表的最小(临床)重要差异。
Respir Med. 2011 Sep;105(9):1388-95. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.05.004. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
2
Minimal clinically important difference for 7 measures of fatigue in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.系统性红斑狼疮患者7种疲劳测量指标的最小临床重要差异
J Rheumatol. 2008 Apr;35(4):635-42. Epub 2008 Mar 1.
3
Determining the minimal clinically important differences in activity, fatigue, and sleep quality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.确定类风湿关节炎患者活动度、疲劳和睡眠质量的最小临床重要差异。
J Rheumatol. 2007 Feb;34(2):280-9.
4
Measuring fatigue in sarcoidosis: the Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS).结节病疲劳程度的测量:疲劳评估量表(FAS)。
Br J Health Psychol. 2004 Sep;9(Pt 3):279-91. doi: 10.1348/1359107041557048.
5
[Methods to determine minimal clinically important difference].
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2009 Nov;34(11):1058-62.
6
Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.腰椎手术患者的最小临床重要差异:使用奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数、医学结局研究简明健康调查问卷36项版本和疼痛量表的方法选择
Spine J. 2008 Nov-Dec;8(6):968-74. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.11.006. Epub 2008 Jan 16.
7
Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion.颈椎融合术后,颈椎残障指数、36 项简短健康调查量表躯体成分概括、颈痛和臂痛量表的最小临床重要差异和显著临床获益。
Spine J. 2010 Jun;10(6):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
8
Minimum clinically important difference for the Nepean Dyspepsia Index, a validated quality of life scale for functional dyspepsia.内佩恩消化不良指数的最小临床重要差异,这是一种经过验证的功能性消化不良生活质量量表。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jun;104(6):1483-8. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.136. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
9
Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum?测试最小临床重要差异:共识还是难题?
Spine J. 2010 Apr;10(4):321-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.10.015.
10
Differences in symptom severity and health status impairment between patients with pulmonary and pulmonary plus extrapulmonary sarcoidosis.肺部结节病患者与肺部合并肺外结节病患者在症状严重程度和健康状况损害方面的差异。
Respir Med. 2008 Nov;102(11):1636-42. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.05.001. Epub 2008 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Long COVID Optimal Health Programme to Enhance Mental and Physical Health: A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial.改善身心健康的新冠后最佳健康计划:一项可行性随机对照试验
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70399. doi: 10.1111/hex.70399.
2
Efficacy of Myofascial Techniques and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in the Treatment of Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus-Randomized Crossover Clinical Study.肌筋膜技术和本体感觉神经肌肉促进技术治疗系统性红斑狼疮患者的疗效——随机交叉临床研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 7;13(13):1625. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131625.
3
Health outcomes up to 3 years and post-exertional malaise in patients after hospitalization for COVID-19: a multicentre prospective cohort study (CO-FLOW).
新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)住院患者长达3年的健康结局及运动后不适:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究(CO-FLOW)
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Apr 6;53:101290. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101290. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Respiratory burden in post-acute COVID-19 sequelae: a longitudinal study of airway and systemic inflammation and clinical outcomes.新冠后急性后遗症中的呼吸负担:气道与全身炎症及临床结局的纵向研究
ERJ Open Res. 2025 Jun 23;11(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.01331-2024. eCollection 2025 May.
5
Long COVID brain fog treatment: An early-phase randomized controlled trial of constraint-induced cognitive therapy signals go.长期新冠脑雾治疗:一项关于强制性诱导认知疗法的早期随机对照试验取得进展。
Rehabil Psychol. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1037/rep0000626.
6
Course of General Fatigue in Patients with Post-COVID-19 Conditions Who Were Prescribed Hochuekkito: A Single-Center Exploratory Pilot Study.服用补中益气汤的新冠后综合征患者一般疲劳的病程:一项单中心探索性试点研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 19;14(4):1391. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041391.
7
Long-Term Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Compared to Relatives with SARS-CoV-2 Infection without Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients without SARS-CoV-2: Results of a Retrospective Case-Control Study.炎症性肠病患者感染新冠病毒的长期后遗症与无炎症性肠病的新冠病毒感染亲属及未感染新冠病毒的炎症性肠病患者的比较:一项回顾性病例对照研究的结果
Visc Med. 2025 Feb;41(1):21-31. doi: 10.1159/000541602. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
8
Is longer really better? Results of a retrospective real-life cohort study evaluating the benefit of adding a weekly educational session to a traditional 8-week home-based pulmonary rehabilitation programme in people with COPD.时间更长真的更好吗?一项回顾性真实队列研究的结果,该研究评估了在传统的为期8周的家庭肺康复计划基础上增加每周一次教育课程对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的益处。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):e092096. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092096.
9
Exploring Physical Activity, Sleep, and Nutrition's Role in Fatigue Among Post-COVID-19 Patients.探索体育活动、睡眠和营养在新冠康复患者疲劳中的作用。
Nutrients. 2024 Nov 26;16(23):4056. doi: 10.3390/nu16234056.
10
Long-term health outcomes of COVID-19 in ICU- and non-ICU-treated patients up to 2 years after hospitalization: a longitudinal cohort study (CO-FLOW).住院后长达2年的ICU和非ICU治疗的COVID-19患者的长期健康结局:一项纵向队列研究(CO-FLOW)
J Intensive Care. 2024 Nov 8;12(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40560-024-00748-w.