Faller R V, Casey K, Amburgey J
The Procter and Gamble Company, Mason, OH, USA.
J Clin Dent. 2011;22(2):29-35.
The objective of this work was to compare the anticaries potential of several currently marketed fluoride-containing mouthrinse products using two in vitro approaches: 1) fluoride uptake studies of demineralized human enamel samples after exposure to rinse products; and 2) microhardness studies of sound enamel samples after exposure to the rinse products and demineralizing agents.
Four currently marketed rinse products, formulated at 100 ppm F, were evaluated in fluoride uptake studies relative to a negative (water) rinse control (Study 1). The same rinse products were evaluated in microhardness studies (Study 2) against a positive control, ACT Anticavity rinse, which is formulated with 225 ppm F and carries the ADA Seal of Acceptance as an effective anticavity mouthrinse. Test products included ACT Total Care rinse (pH = 6.34), Listerine Total Care rinse (pH = 3.57), Crest Pro-Health for Me rinse (pH = 3.33), and Crest Pro-Health Complete rinse (pH = 3.43).
Study 1-Samples treated with any of the fluoride-containing rinses showed significantly higher (p < 0.05) levels of fluoride uptake than the negative (water) control. Two of the products (Crest Pro-Health for Me and Crest Pro-Health Complete) showed significantly higher (p < 0.05) levels of fluoride uptake into demineralized enamel than the other marketed rinses (Listerine Total Care and ACT Total Care). Study 2-Samples treated with the same two rinse products (Crest Pro-Health For Me and Crest Pro-Health Complete) showed significantly lower mineral loss than the other rinse products, as well as the positive control.
Results of these in vitro studies indicate that the Crest mouthrinse products evaluated here are capable of providing significantly better fluoridation of demineralized enamel, as well as significantly better protection against the initiation and progression of demineralization, compared to the other marketed fluoride-containing mouthrinse products tested.
本研究旨在通过两种体外方法比较几种市售含氟漱口水产品的防龋潜力:1)脱矿人牙釉质样本接触漱口水产品后的氟摄取研究;2)完好牙釉质样本接触漱口水产品和脱矿剂后的显微硬度研究。
在氟摄取研究中,相对于阴性(水)漱口水对照(研究1),对四种市售的含100 ppm氟的漱口水产品进行评估。在显微硬度研究(研究2)中,将相同的漱口水产品与阳性对照ACT防龋漱口水进行比较,ACT防龋漱口水含225 ppm氟,并带有美国牙科协会认可标志,是一种有效的防龋漱口水。测试产品包括ACT全效护理漱口水(pH = 6.34)、李施德林全效护理漱口水(pH = 3.57)、佳洁士健康益齿漱口水(pH = 3.33)和佳洁士全优护理漱口水(pH = 3.43)。
研究1 - 用任何一种含氟漱口水处理的样本显示出比阴性(水)对照显著更高(p < 0.05)的氟摄取水平。其中两种产品(佳洁士健康益齿漱口水和佳洁士全优护理漱口水)在脱矿牙釉质中的氟摄取水平比其他市售漱口水(李施德林全效护理漱口水和ACT全效护理漱口水)显著更高(p < 0.05)。研究2 - 用相同的两种漱口水产品(佳洁士健康益齿漱口水和佳洁士全优护理漱口水)处理的样本显示出比其他漱口水产品以及阳性对照显著更低的矿物质损失。
这些体外研究结果表明,与测试的其他市售含氟漱口水产品相比,此处评估的佳洁士漱口水产品能够为脱矿牙釉质提供显著更好的氟化作用,以及对脱矿起始和进展的显著更好的防护。