Schemehorn B R, Wood G D, McHale W, Winston A E
Therametric Technologies, Inc. Noblesville, IN, USA.
J Clin Dent. 2011;22(2):51-4.
The objective of this in vitro study was to compare two 5% sodium fluoride varnishes, each containing different sources of calcium and phosphate, for their ability to deliver fluoride into treated sound tooth enamel and adjacent, but untreated demineralized enamel.
Six sets of 12 bovine enamel cores were mounted in plexiglass rods and the exposed surfaces were polished. Synthetic lesions were formed in the surface of three sets by soaking in thickened, pH 5.0, 1M lactic acid, 50% saturated with calcium hydroxyapatite. A fluoride varnish containing tri-calcium phosphate (TCP) was applied to one set of sound enamel cores, and a second, delivering amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP), was applied to another. A third set of sound enamel cores was water-treated. Each treated sound core was paired with an untreated lesioned core, and the pairs were soaked in artificial saliva for 24 hours at 37 degrees C. The treated cores, but not their lesioned counterparts, were initially soaked in 1.0 N KOH saturated with calcium phosphate for 18 hours. Each core was separately etched with 1.0 N perchloric acid for exactly 15 seconds, and fluoride measured by an ion-sensitive electrode after neutralizing with NaOH and buffering in TISAB II. The amount of calcium extracted was also determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry as a measure of etch depth.
Fluoride uptake average was 1677 +/- 193 ppm, 455 + 38 ppm, and 44 +/- 5 ppm for the sound enamel cores treated with ACP varnish, TCP varnish, and water treatment, respectively. Fluoride uptake into the demineralized enamel averaged 5567 +/- 460 ppm, 2126 +/-126 ppm, and 49 -/+ 4 ppm for demineralized enamel paired with the sound cores treated with ACP varnish, TCP varnish, and water, respectively. The differences between the ACP varnish, the TCP varnish, and the water treatments were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
The ACP varnish formulation delivers statistically significantly more fluoride to both intact and demineralized enamel than the formulation containing TCP.
本体外研究的目的是比较两种5%的氟化钠清漆,每种清漆含有不同的钙和磷来源,比较它们将氟输送到经处理的健康牙釉质以及相邻但未经处理的脱矿牙釉质中的能力。
将六组每组12个牛牙釉质核心安装在有机玻璃棒中,将暴露的表面进行抛光。通过浸泡在pH值为5.0、1M乳酸、50%羟基磷灰石饱和的浓稠溶液中,在三组的表面形成人工龋损。将一种含有磷酸三钙(TCP)的氟化清漆应用于一组健康牙釉质核心,将另一种含有无定形磷酸钙(ACP)的清漆应用于另一组。第三组健康牙釉质核心进行水处理。每个经处理的健康核心与一个未经处理的龋损核心配对,并将这些配对物在37摄氏度的人工唾液中浸泡24小时。经处理的核心,但不包括其龋损对应物,最初在饱和磷酸钙的1.0N氢氧化钾中浸泡18小时。每个核心分别用1.0N高氯酸蚀刻15秒整,在用氢氧化钠中和并在TISAB II中缓冲后,通过离子敏感电极测量氟含量。提取的钙量也通过原子吸收分光光度法测定,作为蚀刻深度的一种度量。
用ACP清漆、TCP清漆和水处理的健康牙釉质核心的氟摄取平均值分别为1677±193ppm、455±38ppm和44±5ppm。与用ACP清漆、TCP清漆和水处理的健康核心配对的脱矿牙釉质中的氟摄取平均值分别为5567±460ppm、2126±126ppm和49±4ppm。ACP清漆、TCP清漆和水处理之间的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。
与含有TCP的配方相比,ACP清漆配方在统计学上能向完整和脱矿牙釉质输送显著更多的氟。