• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
British Columbia hospitals: examination and assessment of payment reform (B-CHeaPR).不列颠哥伦比亚省医院:支付方式改革的检查和评估(B-CHeaPR)。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jun 24;11:150. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-150.
2
Paying for volume: British Columbia's experiment with funding hospitals based on activity.按诊疗量付费:不列颠哥伦比亚省基于诊疗活动对医院进行资金投入的试验。
Health Policy. 2016 Nov;120(11):1322-1328. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.09.010. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
3
Moving from Volume to Value with Hospital Funding Policies in Canada.加拿大医院筹资政策从量到值的转变。
Healthc Pap. 2020 May;19(2):24-35. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2020.26261.
4
Medicare's Bundled Payment Initiatives for Hospital-Initiated Episodes: Evidence and Evolution.医疗保险对医院发起的疾病诊治整体支付计划:证据与演变。
Milbank Q. 2020 Sep;98(3):908-974. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12465. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
5
6
Implementing the 2009 Institute of Medicine recommendations on resident physician work hours, supervision, and safety.实施 2009 年美国医学研究所关于住院医师工作时间、监督和安全的建议。
Nat Sci Sleep. 2011 Jun 24;3:47-85. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S19649. Print 2011.
7
What can the Canadians and Americans learn from each other's health care systems?加拿大人和美国人可以从彼此的医疗保健系统中学到什么?
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2016 Jul;31(3):349-70. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2374. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
8
Hospital response to Activity-Based Funding and price incentives: Evidence from Ireland.医院对基于活动的资金和价格激励的反应:来自爱尔兰的证据。
Health Policy. 2023 Nov;137:104915. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104915. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
9
Comparative costs and impacts of Canadian and American payment systems for mental health services.加拿大和美国心理健康服务支付系统的成本与影响比较
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1989 Aug;40(8):805-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.40.8.805.
10
Addressing government and market failures with payment incentives: Hospital reimbursement reform in Hainan, China.利用支付激励措施应对政府和市场失灵:中国海南的医院报销改革
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jan;58(2):267-77. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00010-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Population-based integrated care funding values and guiding principles: An empirical qualitative study.基于人群的综合护理资金价值与指导原则:一项实证定性研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 23;10(3):e24904. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24904. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
2
Trade-Offs: Pros and Cons of Being a Doctor and Patient in Canada.权衡:在加拿大成为医生和患者的利弊
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 May;32(5):563-565. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3874-0.

本文引用的文献

1
System-wide impacts of hospital payment reforms: evidence from Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia.医院支付改革的全系统影响:来自中东欧和中亚的证据。
J Health Econ. 2010 Jul;29(4):585-602. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.05.007. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
2
Will financial incentives and penalties improve hospital care?经济激励和惩罚措施会改善医院护理状况吗?
BMJ. 2010 Jan 21;340:c88. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c88.
3
CMA transformation initiative scrutinized.美国管理会计师协会转型计划受到审查。
CMAJ. 2009 Oct 13;181(8):E145-6. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3021. Epub 2009 Sep 21.
4
Full speed ahead for CMA's transformation train.中国计量认证(CMA)转型列车全速前进。
CMAJ. 2009 Oct 13;181(8):466. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3024. Epub 2009 Sep 14.
5
CMA president-elect focuses on patient-centred care.美国医学协会候任主席专注于以患者为中心的医疗服务。
CMAJ. 2009 Oct 13;181(8):E140. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3029. Epub 2009 Sep 14.
6
Service-based funding and pay for performance: will incentive payments give Canadian healthcare the quality boost it needs?基于服务的资金投入与绩效薪酬:激励性支付能否提升加拿大医疗保健所需的质量?
Healthc Q. 2009;12(3):42-9.
7
Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program.医疗保险按服务收费项目参保患者的再次住院情况。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 2;360(14):1418-28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0803563.
8
Empirically derived composite measures of surgical performance.基于经验得出的手术绩效综合指标。
Med Care. 2009 Feb;47(2):226-33. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181847574.
9
Using quality indicators to improve hospital care: a review of the literature.利用质量指标改善医院护理:文献综述
Int J Qual Health Care. 2009 Apr;21(2):119-29. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn059. Epub 2009 Jan 20.
10
Activity-based hospital funding: boon or boondoggle?基于活动的医院资金投入:是福音还是浪费?
CMAJ. 2008 May 20;178(11):1407-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080594.

不列颠哥伦比亚省医院:支付方式改革的检查和评估(B-CHeaPR)。

British Columbia hospitals: examination and assessment of payment reform (B-CHeaPR).

机构信息

University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, 201-2206 East Mall, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 1Z3, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jun 24;11:150. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-150.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-11-150
PMID:21702947
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3142203/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accounting for 36% of public spending on health care in Canada, hospitals are a major target for cost reductions through various efficiency initiatives. Some provinces are considering payment reform as a vehicle to achieve this goal. With few exceptions, Canadian provinces have generally relied on global and line-item budgets to contain hospital costs. There is growing interest amongst policy-makers for using activity based funding (ABF) as means of creating financial incentives for hospitals to increase the 'volume' of care, reduce cost, discourage unnecessary activity, and encourage competition. British Columbia (B.C.) is the first province in Canada to implement ABF for partial reimbursement of acute hospitalization. To date, there have been no formal examinations of the effects of ABF policies in Canada. This study proposal addresses two research questions designed to determine whether ABF policies affect health system costs, access and hospital quality. The first question examines the impact of the hospital funding policy change on internal hospital activity based on expenditures and quality. The second question examines the impact of the change on non-hospital care, including readmission rates, amount of home care provided, and physician expenditures.

METHODS/DESIGN: A longitudinal study design will be used, incorporating comprehensive population-based datasets of all B.C. residents; hospital, continuing care and physician services datasets will also be used. Data will be linked across sources using anonymized linking variables. Analytic datasets will be created for the period between 2005/2006 and 2012/2013.

DISCUSSION

With Canadian hospitals unaccustomed to detailed scrutiny of what services are provided, to whom, and with what results, the move toward ABF is significant. This proposed study will provide evidence on the impacts of ABF, including changes in the type, volume, cost, and quality of services provided. Policy- and decision-makers in B.C. and elsewhere in Canada will be able to use this evidence as a basis for policy adaptations and modifications. The significance of this proposed study derives from the fact that the change in hospital funding policy has the potential to affect health system costs, residents' access to care and care quality.

摘要

背景

在加拿大的医疗保健公共支出中,医院占 36%,因此成为通过各种效率举措降低成本的主要目标。一些省份正在考虑将支付改革作为实现这一目标的手段。除了少数例外,加拿大各省通常依靠全球和项目预算来控制医院成本。政策制定者越来越有兴趣使用基于活动的资金(ABF)作为激励医院增加“护理量”、降低成本、抑制不必要的活动和鼓励竞争的手段。不列颠哥伦比亚省(B.C.)是加拿大第一个实施 ABF 来部分报销急性住院费用的省份。迄今为止,加拿大还没有对 ABF 政策的效果进行正式审查。本研究提案旨在确定 ABF 政策是否会影响卫生系统成本、获得和医院质量,提出了两个研究问题。第一个问题考察了医院资金政策变化对基于支出和质量的内部医院活动的影响。第二个问题考察了这种变化对非医院护理的影响,包括再入院率、提供的家庭护理量和医生支出。

方法/设计:将采用纵向研究设计,纳入不列颠哥伦比亚省所有居民的综合基于人群的数据集;还将使用医院、长期护理和医生服务数据集。将使用匿名链接变量在各个来源之间链接数据。将为 2005/2006 年至 2012/2013 年期间创建分析数据集。

讨论

由于加拿大医院不习惯详细审查提供了哪些服务、提供给了谁以及结果如何,因此向 ABF 的转变意义重大。这项拟议的研究将提供关于 ABF 影响的证据,包括所提供服务的类型、数量、成本和质量的变化。不列颠哥伦比亚省和加拿大其他地区的政策制定者和决策者将能够利用这些证据作为政策调整和修改的基础。这项拟议研究的意义在于,医院资金政策的变化有可能影响卫生系统成本、居民获得护理的机会和护理质量。