Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚低氟地区儿童乳牙列和恒牙列牙釉质缺陷的比较。

Comparison of enamel defects in the primary and permanent dentitions of children from a low-fluoride District in Australia.

作者信息

Seow W Kim, Ford Daniel, Kazoullis Stauros, Newman Bruce, Holcombe Trevor

机构信息

Professor and director, Centre for Paediatric Dentistry Research and Training, School of Dentistry, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Pediatr Dent. 2011 May-Jun;33(3):207-12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare developmental defects of enamel (DDE) in the primary and permanent dentitions of children from a low-fluoride district.

METHODS

A total of 517 healthy schoolchildren were examined using the modified DDE criteria.

RESULTS

The prevalence of DDE in the primary and permanent dentition was 25% and 58%, respectively (P<.001). The mean number of teeth with enamel opacity per subject was approximately threefold compared to that affected by enamel hypoplasia (3.1±3.8 vs 0.8±1.4, P<.001 in the primary dentition and 3.6±4.7 vs 1.2±2.2, P<.001 in the permanent dentition). Demarcated opacities (83%) were predominant compared to diffuse opacities (17%), while missing enamel was the most common type of enamel hypoplasia (50%), followed by grooves (31%) and enamel pits (19%) (P=.04). In the permanent dentition, diffuse and demarcated opacities were equally frequent, while enamel grooves were the commonest type of hypoplasia (52%), followed by missing enamel (35%) and enamel pits (5%; P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a low-fluoride community, developmental defects of enamel were twice as common in the permanent dentition vs the primary dentition. In the primary dentition, the predominant defects were demarcated opacities and missing enamel, while in the permanent dentition, the defects were more variable.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较来自低氟地区儿童乳牙列和恒牙列的釉质发育缺陷(DDE)情况。

方法

采用改良的DDE标准对517名健康学童进行检查。

结果

乳牙列和恒牙列中DDE的患病率分别为25%和58%(P<0.001)。每位受试者釉质透明度异常的牙齿平均数量约为釉质发育不全牙齿数量的三倍(乳牙列中分别为3.1±3.8颗与0.8±1.4颗,P<0.001;恒牙列中分别为3.6±4.7颗与1.2±2.2颗,P<0.001)。界限清晰的透明度异常(83%)比弥漫性透明度异常(17%)更为常见,而釉质缺失是釉质发育不全最常见的类型(50%),其次是沟状缺损(31%)和釉质窝(19%)(P=0.04)。在恒牙列中,弥漫性和界限清晰的透明度异常出现频率相同,而釉质沟是发育不全最常见的类型(52%),其次是釉质缺失(35%)和釉质窝(5%;P<0.001)。

结论

在低氟社区,恒牙列中釉质发育缺陷的发生率是乳牙列的两倍。在乳牙列中,主要缺陷是界限清晰的透明度异常和釉质缺失,而在恒牙列中,缺陷情况更为多样。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验