• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前支架置入可降低输尿管镜检查的成本。

Preoperative stent placement decreases cost of ureteroscopy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213-3232, USA.

出版信息

Urology. 2011 Aug;78(2):309-13. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.03.055. Epub 2011 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2011.03.055
PMID:21703670
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effect of preoperative stent placement on total cost of ureteroscopic stone intervention. Passive ureteral dilation with a preoperative ureteral stent has been proposed as a method to facilitate both upper tract access and stone removal.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent ureteroscopic stone intervention at our institution from 2005 to 2009. A sample of patients who had undergone stenting before ureteroscopy was selected and nonstented matched controls were used as a comparison group. A cost model was used to compare the total healthcare costs for the prestented and nonstented patients with a large (>1 cm) and small (≤1 cm) stone burden using the actual cost accrued for each patient. Sensitivity analyses were used to examine the robustness of the cost model.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients were included in the present study (45 prestented, 59 not prestented). The median stone size was 1 cm (range 0.3-4). The overall stone clearance rate was 95.8%. The median number of procedures was 1. Pre-stenting significantly decreased the total healthcare cost in patients with stones >1 cm. The median cost for the prestented and nonstented cohorts was $17,706 and $27,806, respectively (P < .01). However, prestenting increased the total cost for smaller stones of ≤1 cm, although not significantly. The median cost for the prestented and nonstented cohorts was $10,872 and $12,344, respectively (P = .70). Sensitivity analysis confirmed that the model conclusions are robust.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative stent placement is cost-effective for successful ureteroscopic treatment of stones >1 cm.

摘要

目的

探讨术前支架置入对输尿管镜碎石术总费用的影响。术前输尿管支架的被动扩张被认为是一种便于上尿路进入和碎石的方法。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2005 年至 2009 年在我院行输尿管镜碎石术的患者记录。选择了一组接受输尿管镜检查前支架置入的患者作为样本,并将未接受支架置入的匹配对照组作为比较组。使用成本模型比较了大(>1cm)和小(≤1cm)结石负担的支架置入组和未支架置入组患者的总医疗保健费用,使用每位患者实际发生的成本进行比较。进行敏感性分析以检查成本模型的稳健性。

结果

本研究共纳入 104 例患者(45 例支架置入,59 例未支架置入)。中位结石大小为 1cm(范围 0.3-4cm)。总体结石清除率为 95.8%。中位数手术次数为 1 次。对于结石>1cm 的患者,支架置入术显著降低了总医疗保健成本。支架置入组和未支架置入组的中位费用分别为 17706 美元和 27806 美元(P<0.01)。然而,支架置入术增加了≤1cm 小结石的总费用,但无统计学意义。支架置入组和未支架置入组的中位费用分别为 10872 美元和 12344 美元(P=0.70)。敏感性分析证实模型结论稳健。

结论

术前支架置入术对于成功治疗>1cm 的输尿管镜碎石术是具有成本效益的。

相似文献

1
Preoperative stent placement decreases cost of ureteroscopy.术前支架置入可降低输尿管镜检查的成本。
Urology. 2011 Aug;78(2):309-13. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.03.055. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
2
Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on stone-free rates of ureteroscopy for nephroureterolithiasis: a matched-paired analysis of 286 patients.术前输尿管支架置入对输尿管镜治疗肾输尿管结石结石清除率的影响:286 例配对分析。
Urology. 2012 Dec;80(6):1214-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.06.064. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
3
Preoperative stenting decreases operative time and reoperative rates of ureteroscopy.术前支架置入术可减少输尿管镜手术的手术时间和再次手术率。
J Endourol. 2011 May;25(5):751-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0400. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
4
Preoperative stenting for ureteroscopic lithotripsy for a large renal stone.术前支架置入术在输尿管镜碎石术治疗大肾结石中的应用。
Int J Urol. 2012 Sep;19(9):881-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03046.x. Epub 2012 May 14.
5
Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on outcome of ureteroscopic treatment for urinary lithiasis.术前输尿管支架置入对输尿管镜治疗尿路结石疗效的影响。
J Urol. 2009 Dec;182(6):2768-74. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.043. Epub 2009 Oct 17.
6
Cost-effectiveness of treating ureteral stones in a Taipei City Hospital: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus lithoclast.台北市立医院治疗输尿管结石的成本效益:冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查联合碎石器治疗的比较
Urol Int. 2009;83(4):410-5. doi: 10.1159/000251180. Epub 2009 Dec 8.
7
When is prior ureteral stent placement necessary to access the upper urinary tract in prepubertal children?在青春期前儿童中,何时需要预先放置输尿管支架以进入上尿路?
J Urol. 2008 Oct;180(4 Suppl):1861-3; discussion 1863-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.106. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
8
Is ureteral stenting necessary after uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy? A prospective, randomized controlled trial.单纯输尿管镜碎石术后是否需要放置输尿管支架?一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Urol. 2002 May;167(5):1977-80.
9
Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.治疗近端输尿管结石的效率与成本:冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查联合钬:钇铝石榴石激光治疗的比较
Urology. 2004 Dec;64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.07.040.
10
Routine ureteral stenting after ureteroscopy for ureteral lithiasis: is it really necessary?输尿管镜检查治疗输尿管结石后常规放置输尿管支架:真的有必要吗?
J Urol. 2001 Oct;166(4):1252-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and effectiveness of preoperative stenting compared to non-stenting in ureteroscopy for urinary stone disease: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.输尿管镜检查治疗尿路结石疾病时术前支架置入与非支架置入的安全性和有效性比较:一项比较研究的荟萃分析
World J Urol. 2024 Dec 4;43(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05365-8.
2
Comparison of immediate versus post-stenting ureteroscopy for ureteral stones treatment.比较即刻与支架后置输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石。
J Med Life. 2023 Dec;16(12):1745-1749. doi: 10.25122/jml-2023-0199.
3
Primary Ureteroscopy without Pre-Stenting for Proximal Ureteral Stones-Is It Feasible?
无预支架置入的原发性输尿管镜检查治疗近端输尿管结石——可行吗?
Life (Basel). 2023 Oct 5;13(10):2019. doi: 10.3390/life13102019.
4
Predicting failed access in unstented ureteroscopy.预测无支架输尿管镜检查中入路失败的情况。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Feb 28;51(1):41. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01410-0.
5
Safety and Efficacy of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Surgery: Results of Our Large Patient Series.软性输尿管肾镜手术的安全性和有效性:我们大量患者系列的结果
Cureus. 2022 Mar 18;14(3):e23307. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23307. eCollection 2022 Mar.
6
The use of 14/16Fr ureter access sheath for safe and effective management of large upper ureteral calculi.使用14/16Fr输尿管接入鞘安全有效地处理上段输尿管大结石。
World J Urol. 2022 May;40(5):1217-1222. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-03949-w. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
7
Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Abridged version.加拿大泌尿外科协会指南:输尿管结石的管理——缩略版
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Dec;15(12):383-393. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7652.
8
Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Full-text.加拿大泌尿外科协会指南:输尿管结石的管理 - 全文
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Dec;15(12):E676-E690. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7581.
9
Preoperative ureteral stenting prior to ureteroscopy for management of urolithiasis does not impact the postoperative return for unplanned care.输尿管镜检查治疗尿路结石术前进行输尿管支架置入术对术后因意外情况再次就医并无影响。
Urol Ann. 2019 Jul-Sep;11(3):282-286. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_78_18.
10
The efficacy of flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy and miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal and proximal ureteral calculi of ≤2 cm: A retrospective study.柔性输尿管镜碎石术与微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径≤2 cm的肾及输尿管上段结石的疗效:一项回顾性研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar;98(11):e14535. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014535.