Centre for Forensic Science, Department of Pure & Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, Royal College, 204 George Street, Glasgow G1 1XW, United Kingdom.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2012 Mar;6(2):282-5. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.04.018. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
Efficient isolation of DNA from a sample is the basis for successful forensic DNA profiling. There are many DNA extraction methods available and they vary in their ability to efficiently extract the DNA; as well as in processing time, operator intervention, contamination risk and ease of use. In recent years, automated robots have been made available which speed up processing time and decrease the amount of operator input. This project was set up to investigate the efficiency of three DNA extraction methods, two manual (Chelex(®)-100 and the QIAGEN DNA Investigator Kit) and one automated (QIAcube), using both buccal cells and blood stains as the DNA source. Extracted DNA was quantified using real-time PCR in order to assess the amount of DNA present in each sample. Selected samples were then amplified using AmpFlSTR SGM Plus amplification kit. The results suggested that there was no statistical difference between results gained for the different methods investigated, but the automated QIAcube robot made sample processing much simpler and quicker without introducing DNA contamination.
从样本中高效分离 DNA 是成功进行法医 DNA 分析的基础。有许多 DNA 提取方法,它们在提取 DNA 的效率、处理时间、操作人员干预、污染风险和易用性方面存在差异。近年来,自动化机器人已经问世,它们可以缩短处理时间,减少操作人员的投入。本项目旨在研究三种 DNA 提取方法的效率,两种手动方法(Chelex(®)-100 和 QIAGEN DNA Investigator Kit)和一种自动化方法(QIAcube),使用口腔细胞和血斑作为 DNA 来源。使用实时 PCR 对提取的 DNA 进行定量,以评估每个样本中存在的 DNA 量。然后使用 AmpFlSTR SGM Plus 扩增试剂盒对选定的样本进行扩增。结果表明,不同方法之间的结果没有统计学差异,但自动化 QIAcube 机器人使样品处理更加简单快捷,同时不会引入 DNA 污染。