Department of Urology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, Shaanxi, 710032, China.
Urol Oncol. 2013 Jul;31(5):628-34. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.05.009. Epub 2011 Jun 25.
To identify the differences of 5-methylcytosine (5-MC) level between primary prostate cancer tissues (PCTs), prostate cancer-adjacent benign tissues (PCABTs), low-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (LGPIN), and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), and further analysis the 5-MC alterations in prostate cancer with pathologic grade and clinical prognosis.
Immunohistochemistry method with a 5-MC monoclonal antibody was used to identify the 5-methylcytosine (5-MC) levels in PCTs, PCABTs, LGPIN, and HGPIN specimens in the present study. Statistical analysis with SPSS software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used to compare differences of 5-MC levels in the four groups and evaluate the 5-MC alterations in prostate cancer with pathologic grade and clinical prognosis.
We found that 38 of 48 (79.1%) patients studied showed a decrease in 5-MC staining of PCTs compared with PCABTs. The difference in the methylation levels for the PCTs and the PCABTs was highly statistically significant (P < 0.001). Spearman correlation showed there was no statistically significant association between the average score of 5-MC staining and Gleason score sum. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patient group with no or weak 5-MC staining compared with group with moderate and strong 5-MC staining was associated with better survival of patients, although there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in predicating prognosis (P = 0.385). The average scores of 5-MC staining for LGPIN, HGPIN, PCABTs, and PCTs groups were 6.91, 1.58, 6.63, and 3.10, respectively. The methylation level of HGPIN group, as well as that of PCTs group, was significantly lower than those of LGPIN (P < 0.001; P < 0.001) and PCABTs groups (P < 0.001; P < 0.001), respectively, with the 5-MC levels of PCABTS group similar to that of LGPIN group (P = 0.476). 5-MC levels of HGPIN group was lower than that PCTs group (P = 0.004).
We found that global DNA methylation was low in most prostate cancer compared with benign regions from the same patient's sections. None of the DNA hypomethylation changes in primary cancers were associated with pathologic grade and clinical prognosis. In addition, immunohistochemistry showed that the global methylation was lower in HGPIN compared with LGPIN and methylcytosine staining in HGPIN was lower than that of PCTs. The results suggest that global DNA hypomethylation might play an important role in the process of prostate cancer initiation rather than progression.
鉴定原发性前列腺癌组织(PCTs)、前列腺癌旁良性组织(PCABTs)、低级别前列腺上皮内瘤变(LGPIN)和高级别前列腺上皮内瘤变(HGPIN)中 5-甲基胞嘧啶(5-MC)水平的差异,并进一步分析前列腺癌中 5-MC 改变与病理分级和临床预后的关系。
采用 5-MC 单克隆抗体免疫组化法鉴定 PCTs、PCABTs、LGPIN 和 HGPIN 标本中的 5-MC 水平。采用 SPSS 软件(芝加哥,IL,SPSS 公司)进行统计学分析,比较四组之间 5-MC 水平的差异,并评估前列腺癌中 5-MC 改变与病理分级和临床预后的关系。
我们发现,48 例患者中有 38 例(79.1%)的 PCTs 中 5-MC 染色较 PCABTs 减少。PCTs 和 PCABTs 的甲基化水平差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。Spearman 相关分析显示,5-MC 染色的平均评分与 Gleason 评分总和之间无统计学意义上的相关性。Kaplan-Meier 生存分析显示,与中度和强 5-MC 染色组相比,无或弱 5-MC 染色组的患者生存率更高,但两组在预测预后方面无统计学意义差异(P = 0.385)。LGPIN、HGPIN、PCABTs 和 PCTs 组的 5-MC 染色平均评分分别为 6.91、1.58、6.63 和 3.10。HGPIN 组和 PCTs 组的甲基化水平明显低于 LGPIN 组(P < 0.001;P < 0.001)和 PCABTs 组(P < 0.001;P < 0.001),而 PCABTs 组的 5-MC 水平与 LGPIN 组相似(P = 0.476)。HGPIN 组的 5-MC 水平低于 PCTs 组(P = 0.004)。
我们发现与同一患者切片的良性区域相比,大多数前列腺癌中的全基因组甲基化水平较低。原发性癌症中没有观察到 DNA 低甲基化改变与病理分级和临床预后相关。此外,免疫组化显示 HGPIN 中的全基因组甲基化水平低于 LGPIN,HGPIN 中的甲基胞嘧啶染色水平低于 PCTs。这些结果表明,全基因组 DNA 低甲基化可能在前列腺癌发生过程中发挥重要作用,而不是在进展过程中。