• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

区域化对食管癌切除术结果的影响:一项加拿大全国性研究。

The effect of regionalization on outcome in esophagectomy: a Canadian national study.

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Surgery, St. Joseph's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Aug;92(2):485-90; discussion 490. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.089. Epub 2011 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.089
PMID:21704974
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Regionalization of specialized surgical services has been proposed to improve outcomes based on the reported association between volume and outcomes. The effect of regionalization of esophagectomy on in-hospital mortality (IHM) and length of stay (LOS) was examined.

METHODS

Data from a Canadian database for 6985 patients (74% men; median age, 66 years) who underwent esophagectomy (1998 to 2007) were analyzed with a multivariable mixed model regression controlling for age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, and year of esophagectomy to evaluate the effect of hospital volume. Volume changes were evaluated within and between hospitals.

RESULTS

From 1998 to 2007, the number of hospitals performing esophagectomies decreased (101 to 85). The percentage of patients treated in large-volume (>20 cases/year) centers increased (29% to 61%) and IHM decreased (9.1% to 3.6%). The odds of IHM decreased 64% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51% to 74%), and LOS decreased 38% (95% CI, 34% to 43%). Comparing between hospitals, an increase of 10 cases was associated with a 15% decrease in IHM (95% CI, 6% to 23%, p=0.001) and a 10% increase in LOS (95% CI, 2% to 19%, p=0.01). Within an individual hospital, the relationship between increasing volume and LOS or IHM was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital mortality for esophagectomy has decreased in Canada but was not significantly reduced when volume was increased within a given hospital. Improved IHM may be related to selective referral of patients to high-volume hospitals. Although, decreased IHM is not solely attributable to volume changes, our results support regionalization policies for esophagectomy.

摘要

背景

根据报道的手术量与结果之间的关联,提出了将专业外科手术服务区域化,以改善结果。本文研究了食管癌切除术的区域化对住院死亡率(IHM)和住院时间(LOS)的影响。

方法

对加拿大数据库中 6985 例(74%为男性;中位年龄为 66 岁)食管癌患者(1998 年至 2007 年)的数据进行了多变量混合模型回归分析,控制了年龄、性别、Charlson 合并症指数和食管癌手术年份,以评估医院容量的影响。评估了医院内和医院间的容量变化。

结果

1998 年至 2007 年,行食管癌切除术的医院数量减少(101 家至 85 家)。在大手术量(>20 例/年)中心治疗的患者比例增加(29%至 61%),IHM 降低(9.1%至 3.6%)。IHM 的发生风险降低了 64%(95%可信区间,51%至 74%),LOS 降低了 38%(95%可信区间,34%至 43%)。比较医院间,手术量增加 10 例与 IHM 降低 15%相关(95%可信区间,6%至 23%,p=0.001),LOS 增加 10%相关(95%可信区间,2%至 19%,p=0.01)。在单个医院内,增加手术量与 LOS 或 IHM 之间没有显著关系。

结论

在加拿大,食管癌手术的住院死亡率有所下降,但在特定医院增加手术量时,死亡率并没有显著降低。IHM 的改善可能与患者被选择性转诊到高手术量医院有关。尽管 IHM 的降低不仅仅归因于手术量的变化,但我们的结果支持食管癌的区域化政策。

相似文献

1
The effect of regionalization on outcome in esophagectomy: a Canadian national study.区域化对食管癌切除术结果的影响:一项加拿大全国性研究。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Aug;92(2):485-90; discussion 490. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.089. Epub 2011 Jun 25.
2
Esophagectomy in the state of Florida: is regionalization of care warranted?佛罗里达州的食管癌切除术:护理区域化是否必要?
Am Surg. 2012 Mar;78(3):291-5.
3
Outcome and cost of craniotomy performed to treat tumors in regional academic referral centers.在地区学术转诊中心进行开颅手术治疗肿瘤的结果与成本。
Neurosurgery. 2003 May;52(5):1056-63; discussion 1063-5.
4
Useful benchmarks to evaluate outcomes after esophagectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy.评估食管癌切除术和胰十二指肠切除术后结果的有用基准。
Am J Surg. 2004 May;187(5):604-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.01.009.
5
Differences in operative mortality between high- and low-volume hospitals in Ontario for 5 major surgical procedures: estimating the number of lives potentially saved through regionalization.安大略省高手术量医院和低手术量医院在5种主要外科手术中的手术死亡率差异:估算通过区域化可能挽救的生命数量。
CMAJ. 2003 May 27;168(11):1409-14.
6
Surgical volume impacts bariatric surgery mortality: a case for centers of excellence.手术量影响减肥手术死亡率:卓越中心的实例
Surgery. 2008 Nov;144(5):736-43. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Jul 21.
7
Relationship between hospital volume and outcomes of esophageal variceal bleeding in the United States.美国医院规模与食管静脉曲张出血治疗结果之间的关系。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Jul;6(7):789-98. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.03.007. Epub 2008 Jun 4.
8
Outcomes of esophagectomy at academic centers: an association between volume and outcome.学术中心食管切除术的结果:手术量与结果之间的关联。
Am Surg. 2008 Oct;74(10):939-43.
9
Relationship among hospital ERCP volume, length of stay, and technical outcomes.医院内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)手术量、住院时间和技术结果之间的关系。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Sep;64(3):338-47. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.05.016.
10
Should esophagectomy be performed in a low-volume center?低手术量中心是否应开展食管癌切除术?
Am Surg. 2002 Apr;68(4):348-51; discussion 351-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospital volume-mortality association after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.癌症患者食管癌切除术的医院容量-死亡率相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):3021-3029. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001185.
2
Multicentre positive deviance seminar to generate best practice recommendations to reduce anastomotic leak and length of stay for patients undergoing oesophagectomy.多中心正偏离研讨会,旨在生成最佳实践建议,以减少接受食管切除术患者的吻合口漏和住院时间。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Dec 18;12(4):e002458. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002458.
3
ERAS guidelines for esophagectomy: adherence patterns among Canadian thoracic surgeons.
加拿大胸外科医生的食管癌根治术 ERAS 指南:遵循情况。
Updates Surg. 2023 Aug;75(5):1203-1210. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01478-8. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
4
Multicentre positive deviance to reduce adverse events and length of stay after pulmonary resection.多中心积极偏差法降低肺切除术后不良事件和住院时间。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jan;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001997.
5
Time to Surgery for Patients with Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Trimodal Therapy in Ontario: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.安大略省接受三联疗法的食管癌患者的手术时间:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Aug 20;29(8):5901-5918. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29080466.
6
Short-term outcome for high-risk patients after esophagectomy.高危患者食管切除术后的短期预后。
Dis Esophagus. 2022 Dec 31;36(1). doi: 10.1093/dote/doac028.
7
Variation in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcome of Esophageal Cancer in a Regionalized Care System in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省区域性照护体系中食管癌的诊断、治疗和结局的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2126090. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.26090.
8
The Impact of Hospital Size on National Trends and Outcomes Following Open Esophagectomy.医院规模对开放性食管切除术后全国趋势及预后的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Oct 3;55(10):669. doi: 10.3390/medicina55100669.
9
Regionalization of thoracic surgery improves short-term cancer esophagectomy outcomes.胸外科区域化可改善食管癌切除术的短期疗效。
J Thorac Dis. 2019 May;11(5):1867-1878. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.05.30.
10
Hospital Volume, In-Hospital Mortality, and Failure to Rescue in Esophageal Surgery.食管手术中的医院容量、住院死亡率和救援失败。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Nov 23;115(47):793-800. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0793.