Black Dog Institute, Hospital Rd, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
J Affect Disord. 2011 Nov;134(1-3):126-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.06.004. Epub 2011 Jun 25.
This study aimed to examine differences between mindfulness, dysfunctional attitudes and response styles in subjects with bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder and controls.
A total of 192 participants were included in this study: 90 with bipolar disorder, 36 with remitted major depressive disorder and 66 subjects without a current or past history of a mood disorder.
After controlling for current mood state and co-morbid anxiety disorders, the groups did not differ on mindfulness or response styles scores, however, those with bipolar disorder scored significantly higher on the Dependency and Achievement subscales of the Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale than the other two groups.
Sample sizes were relatively small for the control and remitted major depressive disorder groups making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions.
Participants with bipolar disorder appear to significantly differ from remitted depressives and controls on certain cognitive styles such as Dependency and Achievement on the Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale. Further research may help to understand how these cognitive domains impact on the course and outcome of bipolar disorder.
本研究旨在考察双相情感障碍、重性抑郁障碍和对照组受试者在正念、功能失调态度和反应方式上的差异。
本研究共纳入 192 名参与者:90 名双相情感障碍患者,36 名缓解期重性抑郁障碍患者和 66 名无当前或既往心境障碍史的受试者。
在控制当前心境状态和共患焦虑障碍后,各组在正念或反应方式评分上无差异,但双相情感障碍组在功能失调态度量表的依赖和成就分量表上的得分显著高于其他两组。
对照组和缓解期重性抑郁障碍组的样本量相对较小,难以得出明确的结论。
双相情感障碍患者在某些认知方式上,如功能失调态度量表上的依赖和成就,与缓解期抑郁症患者和对照组明显不同。进一步的研究可能有助于了解这些认知领域如何影响双相情感障碍的病程和结局。