Suppr超能文献

慢性下腰痛患者管理的疼痛神经生理学教育:系统评价与荟萃分析

Pain neurophysiology education for the management of individuals with chronic low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Clarke Clare Louise, Ryan Cormac Gerard, Martin Denis J

机构信息

The School of Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Man Ther. 2011 Dec;16(6):544-9. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 Jun 25.

Abstract

Pain neurophysiology education (PNE) is a form of education for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the evidence for PNE in the management of pateints with CLBP. A literature search of MEDLINE, CINAHL and AMED was performed from 1996(01)-2010(09). RCT appraisal and synthesis was assessed using the Cochrane Back Review Group (CBRG) guidelines. The main outcome measures were pain, physical-function, psychological-function, and social-function. Two moderate quality RCTs (n=122) were included in the final review. According to the CBRG criteria there was very low quality evidence that PNE is beneficial for pain, physical-function, psychological-function, and social-function. Meta-analysis found PNE produced statistically significant but clinically small improvements in short-term pain of 5mm (0, 10.0mm) [mean difference (95%CI)] on the 100mm VAS. This review was limited by the small number of studies (n=2) that met the inclusion criteria and by the fact that both studies were produced by the same group that published the PNE manual. These factors contributed to the relatively low grading of the evidence. There is a need for more studies investigating PNE by different research groups to support early promising findings. Until then firm clinical recommendations cannot be made.

摘要

疼痛神经生理学教育(PNE)是针对慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者的一种教育形式。本系统评价的目的是调查PNE在CLBP患者管理中的证据。对1996年1月至2010年9月期间的MEDLINE、CINAHL和AMED进行了文献检索。使用Cochrane背部回顾小组(CBRG)指南评估随机对照试验(RCT)的评估和综合情况。主要结局指标为疼痛、身体功能、心理功能和社会功能。最终评价纳入了两项中等质量的RCT(n = 122)。根据CBRG标准,有非常低质量的证据表明PNE对疼痛、身体功能、心理功能和社会功能有益。荟萃分析发现,PNE在100mm视觉模拟量表(VAS)上使短期疼痛产生了统计学上显著但临床上较小的改善,改善幅度为5mm(0,10.0mm)[平均差(95%置信区间)]。本评价受到符合纳入标准的研究数量较少(n = 2)以及两项研究均由出版PNE手册的同一组完成这一事实的限制。这些因素导致证据的分级相对较低。需要更多不同研究小组对PNE进行研究,以支持早期有前景的发现。在此之前,无法给出确切的临床建议。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验