Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2011 Jun;11(6):893-9. doi: 10.1586/era.11.68.
The treatment of renal cell carcinoma has evolved tremendously over the years. Initially the entire kidney was removed along with the renal tumor despite the size or extent of the mass. Early attempts to remove tumors with a normal surrounding parenchymal margin showed equivalent oncologic results in small renal masses. Attempts to preserve more renal parenchyma in patients with compromised renal function led to the enucleation of renal masses by blunt dissection following the natural plane between the peritumor pseudocapsule and the renal parenchyma. Enucleation of renal tumors has been especially useful for renal preservation in patients with preoperative renal insufficiency, solitary kidneys, multiple renal lesions and hereditary renal cell carcinoma syndromes. Comparable long-term progression and cancer-specific survival has been shown with tumor enucleation and standard partial nephrectomy. However, there has been considerable controversy regarding the safety of renal tumor enucleation due to histopathologic findings of pseudocapsule tumor invasion. Current data suggest that tumor enucleation is a safe alternative for small renal masses that are locally confined on preoperative imaging, easily delineated intraoperatively and do not appear to grossly invade beyond the pseudocapsule.
多年来,肾细胞癌的治疗方法有了很大的发展。最初,整个肾脏连同肾肿瘤一起被切除,无论肿瘤的大小或范围如何。早期尝试在正常周围实质边缘切除肿瘤,在小的肾肿瘤中显示出等效的肿瘤学结果。为了在肾功能受损的患者中保留更多的肾实质,尝试通过钝性解剖沿着肿瘤假包膜和肾实质之间的自然平面切除肾肿瘤。对于术前肾功能不全、单肾、多发肾病变和遗传性肾细胞癌综合征的患者,肾肿瘤剜除术特别有助于肾保留。肿瘤剜除术和标准部分肾切除术显示出可比的长期进展和癌症特异性生存。然而,由于假包膜肿瘤侵犯的组织病理学发现,肾肿瘤剜除术的安全性存在相当大的争议。目前的数据表明,肿瘤剜除术是一种安全的替代方法,适用于术前影像学显示局部局限、术中易于描绘且似乎不会明显侵犯假包膜的小肾肿瘤。