School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. School of Speech Therapy and Audiology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada. Department of Pediatrics/Neonatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011 Sep;53(9):829-835. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04023.x. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
The aim of this study was to determine whether oral, tactile/kinaesthetic (T/K), or combined (oral+T/K) interventions enhance oral feeding performance and whether combined interventions have an additive/synergistic effect.
Seventy-five preterm infants (mean gestational age 29 wk; standard error of the mean [SEM] 0.3 wk; mean birthweight 1340.3g; SEM 52.5 g; 49 males and 26 females) were randomly assigned to one of three intervention groups or a control group. The oral group received sensorimotor input to the oral structures, the T/K group received sensorimotor input to the trunk and limbs, and the combined group received both. The outcomes were time from introduction of nipple feeding to independent oral feeding (d), proficiency (intake in the first 5 min, %), volume transfer (%), rate of transfer (mL/min), volume loss (%), and length of hospital stay (d).
Infants in the three intervention groups achieved independent oral feeding 9-10 days earlier than those in the control group (p<0.001; effect size 1.9-2.1). Proficiency (p ≤ 0.002; effect size 0.7-1.4) at the time of one to two and three to five oral feedings per day, volume transfer (p ≤ 0.001; effect size 0.8-1.1) at one to two, three to five, and six to eight oral feedings per day, and overall rate of transfer (p ≤ 0.018; effect size 0.8-1.1) were greater, and overall volume losses were less (p ≤ 0.007; effect size 0.9-1.1), than in the control group (p ≤ 0.042). The combined group attained independent oral feeding at a significantly younger postmenstrual age than controls (p=0.020) and had clinically greater proficiency than the T/K group (p=0.020; effect size 0.7) and oral group (p=0.109; effect size 0.5). Length of hospital stay was not significantly different between groups (p=0.792; effect size 0.02-0.3).
Oral and T/K interventions accelerated the transition from introduction to independent oral feeding and enhanced oral feeding skills. T/K has beneficial effects beyond the specific targeted system. The combined sensorimotor intervention led to an additive/synergistic effect for proficiency, further benefiting this population.
本研究旨在确定口腔、触觉/动觉(T/K)或联合(口腔+T/K)干预是否能提高口腔喂养表现,以及联合干预是否具有附加/协同作用。
75 名早产儿(平均胎龄 29 周;均值标准差[SEM]0.3 周;平均出生体重 1340.3g;SEM52.5g;男 49 例,女 26 例)被随机分配到三个干预组或对照组之一。口腔组接受口腔结构的感觉运动输入,T/K 组接受躯干和四肢的感觉运动输入,联合组接受两者。结果为从引入奶嘴喂养到独立口腔喂养的时间(天)、熟练程度(第 1-5 分钟的摄入量%)、容量转移(%)、转移率(mL/min)、容量损失(%)和住院时间(天)。
三组干预组的婴儿比对照组早 9-10 天实现独立口腔喂养(p<0.001;效应大小 1.9-2.1)。每天 1-2 次和 3-5 次口腔喂养时的熟练程度(p≤0.002;效应大小 0.7-1.4)、每天 1-2 次、3-5 次和 6-8 次口腔喂养时的容量转移(p≤0.001;效应大小 0.8-1.1)和整体转移率(p≤0.018;效应大小 0.8-1.1)更高,整体容量损失更少(p≤0.007;效应大小 0.9-1.1),而对照组则(p≤0.042)。联合组的婴儿达到独立口腔喂养的胎龄明显比对照组小(p=0.020),并且与 T/K 组(p=0.020;效应大小 0.7)和口腔组(p=0.109;效应大小 0.5)相比,其熟练程度具有更大的临床意义。各组之间的住院时间无显著差异(p=0.792;效应大小 0.02-0.3)。
口腔和 T/K 干预加速了从引入到独立口腔喂养的过渡,并提高了口腔喂养技能。T/K 除了对特定靶向系统有有益的影响外,还有其他益处。联合感觉运动干预对熟练程度产生了附加/协同作用,进一步使这一人群受益。