Suppr超能文献

单峰和多峰感觉运动干预对早产儿经口喂养结局的影响:一项基于证据的系统评价

Effect of Unimodal and Multimodal Sensorimotor Interventions on Oral Feeding Outcomes in Preterm Infants: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review.

作者信息

Rhooms Latisha, Dow Kimberly, Brandon Cara, Zhao Grace, Fucile Sandra

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics (Drs Dow and Fucile) and School of Rehabilitation Therapy, (Mss Rhooms, Brandon, and Zhao and Dr Fucile), Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Adv Neonatal Care. 2019 Feb;19(1):E3-E20. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000546.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preterm infants often experience difficulty with the transition from tube to oral feeding. While many unimodal and multimodal sensorimotor interventions have been generated to optimize oral feeding skills, there has been little cohesion between interventions.

PURPOSE

The aims of this systematic review were to examine the effect of sensorimotor interventions on oral feeding outcomes and to determine whether multimodal interventions lead to better oral feeding performances than unimodal interventions.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A systematic search of CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO databases was conducted. Studies were reviewed to assess the types of interventions used to improve transition to full oral feeding, volume intake, weight gain, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

The search identified 35 articles. Twenty-six studies examined a unimodal intervention, with the majority focusing on oral sensorimotor input and the others on tactile, auditory, and olfactory input. Nine studies assessed multimodal interventions, with the combination of tactile and kinesthetic stimulation being most common. Results varied across studies due to large differences in methodology, and caution is warranted when interpreting results across studies. The heterogeneity in the studies made it difficult to make any firm conclusions about the effects of sensorimotor interventions on feeding outcomes. Overall, evidence on whether multimodal approaches can lead to better oral feeding outcomes than a unimodal approach was insufficient.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The use of sensorimotor interventions to optimize feeding outcomes in preterm infants varies based on methods used and modalities. These factors warrant caution by clinicians who use sensorimotor interventions in the neonatal intensive care unit.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

Large randomized clinical trials using a standardized approach for the administration of sensorimotor input are needed to further establish the effects on feeding outcomes in preterm infants.

摘要

背景

早产儿在从管饲过渡到经口喂养时常遇到困难。虽然已经产生了许多单模式和多模式感觉运动干预措施来优化经口喂养技能,但各干预措施之间缺乏连贯性。

目的

本系统评价的目的是研究感觉运动干预对经口喂养结果的影响,并确定多模式干预是否比单模式干预能带来更好的经口喂养表现。

检索策略

对CINAHL、Embase、MEDLINE和PsycINFO数据库进行了系统检索。对研究进行了综述,以评估用于改善完全经口喂养过渡、摄入量、体重增加和住院时间的干预措施类型。

结果

检索到35篇文章。26项研究考察了单模式干预,其中大多数关注口腔感觉运动输入,其他则关注触觉、听觉和嗅觉输入。9项研究评估了多模式干预,最常见的是触觉和动觉刺激的组合。由于方法上的巨大差异,各研究结果各不相同,在解释不同研究的结果时需谨慎。研究中的异质性使得难以就感觉运动干预对喂养结果的影响得出任何确凿结论。总体而言,关于多模式方法是否能比单模式方法带来更好的经口喂养结果的证据不足。

对实践的启示

使用感觉运动干预来优化早产儿喂养结果因所采用的方法和模式而异。这些因素值得在新生儿重症监护病房使用感觉运动干预的临床医生谨慎对待。

对研究的启示

需要进行大型随机临床试验,采用标准化方法给予感觉运动输入,以进一步确定对早产儿喂养结果的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验