• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮肤点刺试验对鼠的敏感性可预测城市成年人鼻激发试验的过敏症状。

Skin test sensitivity to mouse predicts allergic symptoms to nasal challenge in urban adults.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Allergy Asthma Proc. 2010 Nov-Dec;31(6):472-6. doi: 10.2500/aap.2010.31.3372.

DOI:10.2500/aap.2010.31.3372
PMID:21708058
Abstract

Epidemiologic studies have shown an association between mouse allergen exposure and asthma morbidity among urban populations, but confirmatory challenge studies in community populations have not been performed. This study was designed to examine the clinical relevance of mouse sensitization using a nasal challenge model. Forty-nine urban adults with asthma underwent skin-prick testing (SPT) and intradermal testing (IDT) with mouse epithelia extract. A positive SPT was defined as a net wheal size ≥3 mm and a positive IDT was defined as a net wheal size ≥6 mm using a 1:100 dilution of extract (1:10 w/v was obtained from Greer Laboratories (Lenoir, NC) as a single lot [Mus m 1 concentration = 2130 ng/mL]). Mouse-specific IgE (m-IgE) was measured by ImmunoCAP (Phadia, Uppsala, Sweden). Nasal challenge was performed with increasing concentrations of mouse epithelia extract and symptoms were assessed by visual analog scale. A positive challenge was defined as a 20-mm increase in the scale. The age range of the 49 participants was 18-50 years; 41% were men and 86% were black. Fourteen participants were SPT(+) to mouse, 15 participants were SPT(-) but (IDT(+)), and 20 participants were negative on both SPT(-) and IDT(-) (SPT(-)/IDT(-)). Sixty-four percent of the SPT(+) group, 40% of the IDT(+) group, and 20% of the SPT(-)/IDT(-) group had a positive nasal challenge. Sixty-seven percent (10/15) of those who were either SPT(+) or m-IgE(+) had a positive nasal challenge. SPT or the combination of SPT plus m-IgE performed best in diagnosing mouse allergy. The great majority of mouse-sensitized urban adults with asthma appear to have clinically relevant sensitization. Urban adults with asthma should be evaluated for mouse sensitization using SPT or SPT plus m-IgE testing.

摘要

流行病学研究表明,城市人群中,鼠过敏原暴露与哮喘发病率之间存在关联,但尚未在社区人群中进行过确认性的激发挑战研究。本研究旨在使用鼻激发模型来检验鼠致敏的临床相关性。49 名患有哮喘的城市成年人接受了皮肤点刺试验(SPT)和鼠上皮提取物的皮内试验(IDT)。SPT 阳性定义为净风团大小≥3mm,IDT 阳性定义为使用 1:100 稀释的提取物(Greer Laboratories(北卡罗来纳州莱诺)获得的 1:10 w/v[Mus m 1 浓度=2130ng/mL])净风团大小≥6mm。鼠特异性 IgE(m-IgE)通过 ImmunoCAP(瑞典 Uppsala 的 Phadia)进行测量。用增加浓度的鼠上皮提取物进行鼻激发,并通过视觉模拟量表评估症状。激发阳性定义为量表增加 20mm。49 名参与者的年龄范围为 18-50 岁;41%为男性,86%为黑人。14 名参与者对鼠 SPT(+),15 名参与者 SPT(-)但 IDT(+),20 名参与者 SPT(-)和 IDT(-)均为阴性(SPT(-)/IDT(-))。SPT(+)组的 64%、IDT(+)组的 40%和 SPT(-)/IDT(-)组的 20%的鼻激发阳性。在 SPT(+)或 m-IgE(+)的 10 名参与者中,有 67%(10/15)的人鼻激发阳性。SPT 或 SPT 加 m-IgE 联合检测对诊断鼠过敏的效果最佳。大多数患有哮喘的城市鼠致敏成年人似乎存在具有临床相关性的致敏。应使用 SPT 或 SPT 加 m-IgE 测试评估患有哮喘的城市成年人的鼠致敏情况。

相似文献

1
Skin test sensitivity to mouse predicts allergic symptoms to nasal challenge in urban adults.皮肤点刺试验对鼠的敏感性可预测城市成年人鼻激发试验的过敏症状。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2010 Nov-Dec;31(6):472-6. doi: 10.2500/aap.2010.31.3372.
2
A comparison of skin prick tests, intradermal skin tests, and specific IgE in the diagnosis of mouse allergy.皮肤点刺试验、皮内皮肤试验和特异性IgE在小鼠过敏诊断中的比较。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Apr;121(4):933-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.01.023. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
3
In vitro diagnostic evaluation of patients with inhalant allergies: summary of probability outcomes comparing results of CLA- and CAP-specific immunoglobulin E test systems.吸入性过敏患者的体外诊断评估:比较CLA和CAP特异性免疫球蛋白E检测系统结果的概率结果总结。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2003 Jul-Aug;24(4):253-8.
4
Clinical Relevance and Advantages of Intradermal Test Results in 371 Patients with Allergic Rhinitis, Asthma and/or Otitis Media with Effusion.371 例变应性鼻炎、哮喘和/或分泌性中耳炎患者皮内试验结果的临床意义和优势。
Cells. 2021 Nov 18;10(11):3224. doi: 10.3390/cells10113224.
5
[Values of intradermal skin test and serum sIgE detection in diagnosing Humulus scandens pollinosis].[皮内皮肤试验及血清特异性IgE检测在葎草花粉症诊断中的价值]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Jul 18;86(27):1906-11.
6
Comparison of skin prick tests with specific serum immunoglobulin E in the diagnosis of fungal sensitization in patients with severe asthma.重度哮喘患者真菌致敏诊断中皮肤点刺试验与特异性血清免疫球蛋白E的比较
Clin Exp Allergy. 2009 Nov;39(11):1677-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03339.x. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
7
The predictive value of allergen skin prick tests and IgE tests at pre-school age: the PACT study.学龄前儿童变应原皮肤点刺试验和IgE检测的预测价值:PACT研究
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2014 Nov;25(7):691-8. doi: 10.1111/pai.12289. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
8
Skin prick testing predicts peanut challenge outcome in previously allergic or sensitized children with low serum peanut-specific IgE antibody concentration.皮肤点刺试验可预测血清花生特异性IgE抗体浓度较低的既往过敏或致敏儿童的花生激发试验结果。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2007 May;18(3):224-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2007.00519.x.
9
Measurement of nasal IgE in an epidemiological study: assessment of its diagnostic value in respiratory allergy.一项流行病学研究中鼻内免疫球蛋白E的测量:评估其在呼吸道过敏中的诊断价值。
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Jun;36(6):225-31.
10
[Rapid specific IgE assay (ImmunoCAP® RAPID) and skin prick test in the diagnosis of allergic disease].[快速特异性IgE检测(免疫CAP®快速法)及皮肤点刺试验在过敏性疾病诊断中的应用]
Arerugi. 2013 Dec;62(12):1631-41.

引用本文的文献

1
Sensitization to rodents (mouse/rat) in urban atopic populations without occupational exposure living in Campania district (Southern Italy): a multicenter study.意大利南部坎帕尼亚地区无职业暴露的城市特应性人群对啮齿动物(小鼠/大鼠)的致敏情况:一项多中心研究。
Multidiscip Respir Med. 2013 Apr 16;8(1):30. doi: 10.1186/2049-6958-8-30.
2
Environmental assessment and exposure reduction of rodents: a practice parameter.啮齿动物的环境评估与暴露减少:一项实践参数。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012 Dec;109(6):375-87. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2012.09.019.