• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衡量临床研究知情同意的过程与质量:开发与测试

Measuring the process and quality of informed consent for clinical research: development and testing.

作者信息

Cohn Elizabeth Gross, Jia Haomiao, Smith Winifred Chapman, Erwin Katherine, Larson Elaine L

机构信息

School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Oncol Nurs Forum. 2011 Jul;38(4):417-22. doi: 10.1188/11.ONF.417-422.

DOI:10.1188/11.ONF.417-422
PMID:21708532
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3638913/
Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To develop and assess the reliability and validity of an observational instrument, the Process and Quality of Informed Consent (P-QIC).

DESIGN

A pilot study of the psychometrics of a tool designed to measure the quality and process of the informed consent encounter in clinical research. The study used professionally filmed, simulated consent encounters designed to vary in process and quality.

SETTING

A major urban teaching hospital in the northeastern region of the United States.

SAMPLE

63 students enrolled in health-related programs participated in psychometric testing, 16 students participated in test-retest reliability, and 5 investigator-participant dyads were observed for the actual consent encounters.

METHODS

For reliability and validity testing, students watched and rated videotaped simulations of four consent encounters intentionally varied in process and content and rated them with the proposed instrument. Test-retest reliability was established by raters watching the videotaped simulations twice. Inter-rater reliability was demonstrated by two simultaneous but independent raters observing an actual consent encounter.

MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES

The essential elements of information and communication for informed consent.

FINDINGS

The initial testing of the P-QIC demonstrated reliable and valid psychometric properties in both the simulated standardized consent encounters and actual consent encounters in the hospital setting.

CONCLUSIONS

The P-QIC is an easy-to-use observational tool that provides a quick assessment of the areas of strength and areas that need improvement in a consent encounter. It can be used in the initial trainings of new investigators or consent administrators and in ongoing programs of improvement for informed consent.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

The development of a validated observational instrument will allow investigators to assess the consent process more accurately and evaluate strategies designed to improve it.

摘要

目的/目标:开发并评估一种观察工具——知情同意过程与质量(P-QIC)的可靠性和有效性。

设计

一项关于旨在测量临床研究中知情同意过程的质量和流程的工具的心理测量学的试点研究。该研究使用了专业拍摄的、模拟的同意过程,这些过程在流程和质量上有所不同。

地点

美国东北部的一家大型城市教学医院。

样本

63名参加健康相关项目的学生参与了心理测量测试,16名学生参与了重测信度测试,观察了5对研究者-参与者进行实际同意过程。

方法

为了进行信度和效度测试,学生观看并对四段同意过程的录像模拟进行评分,这些模拟在过程和内容上有意有所不同,并使用拟议的工具对其进行评分。通过评分者观看录像模拟两次来建立重测信度。通过两名同时但独立的评分者观察实际同意过程来证明评分者间信度。

主要研究变量

知情同意中信息和沟通的基本要素。

结果

P-QIC的初步测试在模拟的标准化同意过程和医院环境中的实际同意过程中都显示出可靠且有效的心理测量特性。

结论

P-QIC是一种易于使用的观察工具,可快速评估同意过程中的优势领域和需要改进的领域。它可用于新研究者或同意过程管理人员的初始培训以及知情同意的持续改进项目。

对护理的启示

一种经过验证的观察工具的开发将使研究者能够更准确地评估同意过程,并评估旨在改进该过程的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ed9/3638913/df8651a52fa0/nihms456596f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ed9/3638913/c0800ce2093b/nihms456596f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ed9/3638913/df8651a52fa0/nihms456596f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ed9/3638913/c0800ce2093b/nihms456596f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ed9/3638913/df8651a52fa0/nihms456596f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring the process and quality of informed consent for clinical research: development and testing.衡量临床研究知情同意的过程与质量:开发与测试
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2011 Jul;38(4):417-22. doi: 10.1188/11.ONF.417-422.
2
Informed consent in randomised controlled trials: development and preliminary evaluation of a measure of Participatory and Informed Consent (PIC).随机对照试验中的知情同意:参与式和知情同意(PIC)测量方法的开发与初步评估
Trials. 2017 Jul 17;18(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2048-7.
3
Quality assurance questionnaire for professionals fails to improve the quality of informed consent.面向专业人员的质量保证调查问卷未能提高知情同意的质量。
Clin Trials. 2007;4(6):638-49. doi: 10.1177/1740774507085144.
4
Egg Donor Informed Consent Tool (EDICT): development and validation of a new informed consent tool for oocyte donors.卵母细胞捐赠者知情同意工具(EDICT):一种新的卵母细胞捐赠者知情同意工具的开发和验证。
Fertil Steril. 2013 May;99(6):1733-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.096. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
5
Psychometric evaluation of the Informed Consent Process Scale in Chinese.中文知情同意过程量表的心理计量学评估。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Nov-Dec;26(7-8):2456-2466. doi: 10.1177/0969733018819126. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
6
Development of a New Tool for Writing Research Key Information in Plain Language.开发一种用于以通俗易懂的语言撰写研究关键信息的新工具。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2024 Jan;8(1):e30-e37. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20240218-01. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
7
Assessing capacity to consent to treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors in dementia using a specific and standardized version of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool (MacCAT-T).使用麦克阿瑟能力评估工具(MacCAT-T)的特定标准化版本评估痴呆患者同意使用胆碱酯酶抑制剂进行治疗的能力。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Feb;29(2):333-343. doi: 10.1017/S104161021600154X. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
8
Motivational Interviewing Skills in Health Care Encounters (MISHCE): Development and psychometric testing of an assessment tool.医疗保健问诊中的动机性访谈技巧(MISHCE):一种评估工具的开发与心理测量测试
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015 Sep-Oct;11(5):696-707. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.12.001. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
9
Quality of informed consent: a new measure of understanding among research subjects.知情同意的质量:研究对象理解程度的一种新度量
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Jan 17;93(2):139-47. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.2.139.
10
Informed Consent and the Limited English Patient: A Pilot Project with Dental Hygiene Students to Assess Student Knowledge, Perceptions, and Attitudes.知情同意与英语水平有限的患者:一项针对口腔卫生专业学生的试点项目,以评估学生的知识、认知和态度。
J Allied Health. 2017 Winter;46(4):220-224.

引用本文的文献

1
Informed consent in randomised controlled trials: further development and evaluation of the participatory and informed consent (PIC) measure.随机对照试验中的知情同意:参与式知情同意(PIC)测量的进一步发展和评估。
Trials. 2023 May 2;24(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07296-y.
2
Health Communication and Decision Making about Vaccine Clinical Trials during a Pandemic.大流行期间疫苗临床试验的健康传播和决策
J Health Commun. 2020 Oct 2;25(10):780-789. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1864520.
3
Improving quality of the informed consent process: Developing an easy-to-read, multimodal, patient-centered format in a real-world setting.提高知情同意过程的质量:在现实环境中开发易于阅读、多模式、以患者为中心的格式。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 May;102(5):944-951. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.022. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
4
Current State of Electronic Consent Processes in Behavioral Health: Outcomes from an Observational Study.行为健康领域电子同意流程的现状:一项观察性研究的结果
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Apr 16;2017:1607-1616. eCollection 2017.
5
Assessing usefulness and researcher satisfaction with consent form templates.评估同意书模板的实用性及研究者满意度。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Aug;1(4):256-259. doi: 10.1017/cts.2017.296.
6
Informed consent in randomised controlled trials: development and preliminary evaluation of a measure of Participatory and Informed Consent (PIC).随机对照试验中的知情同意:参与式和知情同意(PIC)测量方法的开发与初步评估
Trials. 2017 Jul 17;18(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2048-7.
7
". . . I've Gone Through This My Own Self, So I Practice What I Preach . . . ".“……这都是我自己亲身经历过的,所以我言行一致……”
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 Oct;11(4):322-333. doi: 10.1177/1556264616675202. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
8
Improving the Proficiency of Research Consent Administrators.提高研究同意书管理人员的专业水平。
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Aug;8(4):351-4. doi: 10.1111/cts.12252. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
9
Audit of the informed consent process as a part of a clinical research quality assurance program.作为临床研究质量保证计划的一部分,对知情同意过程进行审核。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Jun;20(2):469-79. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9461-4. Epub 2013 Aug 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Recommendations for enhancing clinical trials education: a review of the literature.加强临床试验教育的建议:文献综述
J Cancer Educ. 2011 Mar;26(1):64-71. doi: 10.1007/s13187-010-0160-4.
2
Why does informed consent fail? A discourse analytic approach.为什么知情同意会失败?一种话语分析方法。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2009;37(3):349-62.
3
Toward a construct definition of informed consent comprehension.迈向知情同意理解的结构定义。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2009 Mar;4(1):17-23. doi: 10.1525/jer.2009.4.1.17.
4
Making a difference: incorporating theories of autonomy into models of informed consent.发挥作用:将自主性理论纳入知情同意模型
J Med Ethics. 2008 Sep;34(9):e3. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.023804.
5
Patients do not know the level of training of their doctors because doctors do not tell them.患者并不了解其医生的培训水平,因为医生不会告知他们。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):607-10. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0472-1. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
6
Quality assurance questionnaire for professionals fails to improve the quality of informed consent.面向专业人员的质量保证调查问卷未能提高知情同意的质量。
Clin Trials. 2007;4(6):638-49. doi: 10.1177/1740774507085144.
7
Improving participant comprehension in the informed consent process.提高知情同意过程中参与者的理解能力。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(3):273-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00180.x.
8
Beyond the checklist: assessing understanding for HIV vaccine trial participation in South Africa.超越清单:评估南非对参与HIV疫苗试验的理解
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006 Dec 15;43(5):560-6. doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000247225.37752.f5.
9
A brief measure of perceived understanding of informed consent in a clinical trial was validated.一项关于临床试验中对知情同意感知理解的简短测量方法得到了验证。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Jun;59(6):608-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.009. Epub 2006 Mar 24.
10
Therapeutic misconception in early phase gene transfer trials.早期基因转移试验中的治疗性误解。
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jan;62(1):239-53. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.05.022. Epub 2005 Jul 5.