Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-2914.
Integr Comp Biol. 2002 Aug;42(4):892-908. doi: 10.1093/icb/42.4.892.
Environmental stress and nutrient/productivity models predict the responses of community structure along gradients of physical conditions and bottom-up effects. Although both models have succeeded in helping to understand variation in ecological communities, most tests have been qualitative. Until recently, two roadblocks to more quantitative tests in marine environments have been a lack of (1) inexpensive, field-deployable technology for quantifying (e.g.) temperature, light, salinity, chlorophyll, and productivity, and (2) methods of quantifying the sub-organismal mechanisms linking environmental conditions to their ecological expression. The advent of inexpensive remote-sensing technology, adoption of molecular techniques such as quantification of heat-shock proteins and RNA:DNA ratios, and the formation of interdisciplinary alliances between ecologists and physiologists has begun to overcome these roadblocks. An integrated eco-physiological approach focuses on the determinants of: distributional limits among microhabitat patches and along (local-scale) environmental gradients (e.g., zonation); among-site (mesoscale) differences in community pattern; and geographic (macroscale) differences in ecosystem structure. These approaches promise new insights into the physiological mechanisms underlying variation in processes such as species interactions, physical disturbance, survival and growth. Here, we review two classes of models for community dynamics, and present examples of ecological studies of these models in consumer-prey systems. We illustrate the power of new molecular tools to characterize the sub-organismal responses of some of the same consumers and prey to thermal stress and food concentration. Ecological and physiological evidence tends to be consistent with model predictions, supporting our argument that we are poised to make major advances in the mechanistic understanding of community dynamics along key environmental gradients.
环境压力和养分/生产力模型预测了群落结构在物理条件梯度和底向上效应的影响下的响应。虽然这两个模型都成功地帮助我们理解了生态群落的变化,但大多数测试都是定性的。直到最近,海洋环境中更定量测试的两个障碍一直是缺乏(1)用于量化(例如)温度、光照、盐度、叶绿素和生产力的廉价、现场部署技术,以及(2)将环境条件与其生态表现联系起来的亚生物体机制的量化方法。廉价遥感技术的出现、分子技术(如热休克蛋白和 RNA:DNA 比率的定量)的采用,以及生态学家和生理学家之间的跨学科联盟的形成,已经开始克服这些障碍。综合生态生理学方法侧重于以下因素的决定因素:微生境斑块之间和沿(局部尺度)环境梯度(例如,分带)的分布极限;群落模式的站点间(中尺度)差异;以及生态系统结构的地理(大尺度)差异。这些方法有望深入了解物种相互作用、物理干扰、生存和生长等过程变化的生理机制。在这里,我们回顾了两类群落动态模型,并展示了这些模型在消费者-猎物系统中的生态研究的例子。我们举例说明了新的分子工具的强大功能,这些工具可以描述一些相同的消费者和猎物对热应激和食物浓度的亚生物体反应。生态和生理证据往往与模型预测一致,支持我们的论点,即我们正准备在关键环境梯度上对群落动态的机制理解取得重大进展。