Menge Bruce A
Department of Integrative Biology Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon USA.
Ecol Evol. 2025 Mar 18;15(3):e71121. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71121. eCollection 2025 Mar.
Most studies of species interactions in rocky intertidal communities focus on invertebrate predators and herbivores interacting with sessile invertebrates and macrophytes. However, shorebirds are usually a conspicuous presence on rocky shores and eat sessile and mobile invertebrate prey, often including invertebrate predators and herbivores. Inspired by classic studies of strong bird predation effects in rocky intertidal habitats in Washington state (USA) and South Africa, I tested the effects of bird and invertebrate (sea stars, whelks) predation at multiple sites, wave exposures, and zones on the central Oregon coast from spring 1996 to fall 1997. To gain insight into the effects of birds relative to the effects of invertebrate predators, I used a crossed design, with bird exclusions (present and absent) and invertebrate predator removal (present and reduced). Compared to Washington state and South Africa, birds had little effect on the abundance of sessile or mobile prey in wave-exposed mid, wave-exposed low, and wave-protected mid zones at 2-4 sites. I suggest that differences between Oregon results and those in Washington and South Africa were driven by differences in bird abundance associated with whether the study site had resident colonies of shorebirds (primarily gulls, crows, and oystercatchers). That is, offshore islands often have resident breeding colonies such as in the Washington and South African studies, while sites in this study were all on the mainland where gulls were mostly transient visitors, while resident oystercatchers were usually limited to one or two pairs per site. Comparison with other marine and terrestrial experimental tests suggests that top-down effects of birds often vary in strength, and thus, future investigations should seek to understand the factors that underlie this variation.
大多数关于岩石潮间带群落物种相互作用的研究都集中在无脊椎动物捕食者和食草动物与固着无脊椎动物和大型植物之间的相互作用上。然而,滨鸟在岩石海岸通常很显眼,它们以固着和移动的无脊椎动物为食,通常包括无脊椎动物捕食者和食草动物。受美国华盛顿州和南非岩石潮间带栖息地鸟类强大捕食效应经典研究的启发,我在1996年春季至1997年秋季期间,在俄勒冈州中部海岸的多个地点、不同海浪暴露程度和区域,测试了鸟类和无脊椎动物(海星、蛾螺)捕食的影响。为了深入了解鸟类相对于无脊椎动物捕食者的影响,我采用了交叉设计,设置了鸟类排除(存在和不存在)和无脊椎动物捕食者移除(存在和减少)的情况。与华盛顿州和南非相比,在2至4个地点的海浪暴露的中潮带、海浪暴露的低潮带和海浪保护的中潮带,鸟类对固着或移动猎物的数量影响很小。我认为俄勒冈州的研究结果与华盛顿州和南非的不同,是由于研究地点是否有滨鸟(主要是海鸥、乌鸦和蛎鹬)的常驻群落导致鸟类数量的差异。也就是说,近海岛屿通常有常驻繁殖群落,如华盛顿州和南非的研究中那样,而本研究中的地点都在大陆上,海鸥大多是短暂访客,而常驻蛎鹬通常每个地点限于一到两对。与其他海洋和陆地实验测试的比较表明,鸟类的自上而下的影响强度往往不同,因此,未来的研究应该寻求了解这种变化背后的因素。