Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Italy.
Palliat Med. 2011 Jul;25(5):402-9. doi: 10.1177/0269216310392102.
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence that oral morphine can be recommended as the first choice opioid in the treatment of moderate to severe cancer pain in updating the European Association for Palliative Care opioid recommendations. A systematic literature review was performed to update the 2007 Cochrane review 'Oral morphine for cancer pain'. The literature search was conducted on MedLine, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. The search strategy, limited in time (from 1 July 2006 to 31 October 2009), was aimed to be as extensive as possible using both text words and MeSH/EMTREE terms; a hand search of the reference lists of identified papers was also performed. Randomized clinical trials, containing data on efficacy and/or side effects of morphine, were identified. Among the papers retrieved from the cited databases and the Cochrane review, 17 eligible studies, for a total of 2053 patients, and a meta-analysis were selected. These studies do not add significant information to the previous Cochrane review confirming the limitation of efficacy and tolerability data on opioid-naïve and non-selected populations of cancer patients treated with morphine and suggesting that oral morphine, oxycodone and hydromorphone have similar efficacy and toxicity in this patient population.
本系统评价的目的是评估口服吗啡可否作为中度至重度癌症疼痛治疗的首选阿片类药物的证据,用以更新欧洲姑息治疗协会的阿片类药物建议。进行了系统文献回顾,以更新 2007 年 Cochrane 综述“口服吗啡治疗癌症疼痛”。文献检索在 MedLine、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册数据库中进行。检索策略在时间上进行了限制(从 2006 年 7 月 1 日至 2009 年 10 月 31 日),旨在尽可能广泛地使用文本词和 MeSH/EMTREE 术语;还对手头已确定论文的参考文献进行了检索。确定了含有吗啡疗效和/或副作用数据的随机临床试验。在从引用数据库和 Cochrane 综述中检索到的论文中,选择了 17 项符合条件的研究,共涉及 2053 名患者,并进行了荟萃分析。这些研究没有为先前的 Cochrane 综述提供重要信息,证实了在未接受阿片类药物治疗和未选择的癌症患者群体中,吗啡的疗效和耐受性数据存在局限性,并表明口服吗啡、羟考酮和氢吗啡酮在该患者群体中的疗效和毒性相似。