Suppr超能文献

成人爆发性癌痛管理中的阿片类药物:作为 EPCRC 阿片类药物指南项目的一部分进行的系统评价。

Opioids for the management of breakthrough cancer pain in adults: a systematic review undertaken as part of an EPCRC opioid guidelines project.

机构信息

St Clare Hospice, Hastingwood, Essex CM17 9JX, UK.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2011 Jul;25(5):516-24. doi: 10.1177/0269216310385601.

Abstract

The usual management of cancer related breakthrough pain is with supplemental doses of analgesics (commonly opioids) at a dose proportional to the total around-the-clock opioid dose. The aim of this review, undertaken as part of a European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC) project, to update the EAPC guidelines on opioid analgesics in cancer pain was to determine the evidence for the utility of opioids in the management of breakthrough pain in patients with cancer. Randomized controlled trials of opioids used as rescue medication were identified using electronic search strategies. Outcome measures sought were reduction in pain intensity measured by an appropriate scale, adverse effects, attrition, and patient satisfaction. The date of the final search was 31 July 2009. Eight studies (790 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Most studies investigated rescue medication delivery via the buccal or nasal transmucosal routes. Intravenous morphine has been compared with the transmucosal route and the two found to be effective. The oral route has not been formally tested although found to be an inferior comparator in one study. Most studies showed no meaningful relationship between the effective dose of transmucosal opioid and the around-the-clock scheduled medication or the previous rescue medication, although one study found a fixed proportion of either intravenous morphine or transmucosal fentanyl to be efficacious.

摘要

癌症相关爆发性疼痛的常规处理是给予补充剂量的镇痛药(通常是阿片类药物),剂量与全天阿片类药物剂量成比例。本综述是作为欧洲姑息治疗研究合作组织(EPCRC)项目的一部分进行的,旨在更新 EAPC 关于癌症疼痛中阿片类镇痛药的指南,以确定阿片类药物在管理癌症患者爆发性疼痛方面的效用证据。使用电子搜索策略确定了作为解救药物使用的阿片类药物的随机对照试验。寻求的结果衡量标准是通过适当的量表测量的疼痛强度减轻、不良反应、流失和患者满意度。最后一次搜索的日期是 2009 年 7 月 31 日。八项研究(790 名患者)符合纳入标准。大多数研究调查了通过颊或鼻黏膜途径的解救药物输送。静脉注射吗啡已与黏膜途径进行了比较,两种方法均被证明有效。口服途径尚未经过正式测试,尽管在一项研究中发现它是一种较差的比较剂。大多数研究表明,黏膜外阿片类药物的有效剂量与全天计划药物或先前的解救药物之间没有有意义的关系,尽管一项研究发现静脉注射吗啡或黏膜外芬太尼的固定比例是有效的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验