Bhatnagar Sushma, Devi Saraswathi, Vinod Nk, Jain Pn, Durgaprasad G, Maroo Sanjaykumar H, Patel Ketan R
Department of Anesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Department of Anesthetics and Pain Relief, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Indian J Palliat Care. 2014 Sep;20(3):182-7. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.138386.
To compare the efficacy and safety of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) and oral morphine in Indian patients with breakthrough episodes of cancer pain.
In this randomized, open label, active controlled, clinical study, total 186 patients who regularly experienced 1-4 episodes of breakthrough cancer pain (BTCP) daily, over the persistent pain controlled by taking oral morphine 60 mg/day or its equivalent were randomized to receive either OTFC 200 mcg or oral morphine 10 mg for the treatment of BTCP for 3 days. Improvement in pain as determined by numerical rating scale (NRS) at 5, 15, 30, and 60 minutes of drug administration and percentage of BTCP episodes showing reduction in pain intensity by >33% at 15 minutes were primary efficacy endpoints. Secondary efficacy endpoints were requirement for rescue analgesia and global assessment by physician and patient. Data of both treatment groups were analysed by appropriate statistical test using software, STATISTICA, version 11.
Patients treated with OTFC experienced significantly greater improvement in pain intensity of breakthrough episodes compared to those treated with oral morphine at all assessment time points (P < 0.0001). 56% of breakthrough pain episodes treated with OTFC showed a greater than 33% reduction in pain intensity from baseline at 15 minutes compared to 39% episodes treated with oral morphine (P < 0.0001). Patient's and physician's global assessment favoured OTFC than oral morphine (P < 0.0001). Requirement of rescue analgesia in both the study groups was similar (P > 0.05). Both study drugs were well tolerated.
OTFC was found to provide faster onset of analgesic effect than immediate release oral morphine in management of breakthrough cancer pain.
比较口服黏膜芬太尼枸橼酸盐(OTFC)和口服吗啡对印度癌症疼痛突发患者的疗效和安全性。
在这项随机、开放标签、活性对照的临床研究中,共有186例每天经常经历1 - 4次癌症疼痛突发(BTCP)的患者,这些患者的持续性疼痛通过口服60毫克/天吗啡或其等效药物得到控制,他们被随机分为两组,分别接受200微克OTFC或10毫克口服吗啡治疗BTCP,为期3天。给药后5、15、30和60分钟时通过数字评分量表(NRS)确定的疼痛改善情况以及15分钟时疼痛强度降低>33%的BTCP发作百分比为主要疗效终点。次要疗效终点是补救镇痛的需求以及医生和患者的整体评估。使用STATISTICA 11版软件通过适当的统计检验对两个治疗组的数据进行分析。
在所有评估时间点,与口服吗啡治疗的患者相比,接受OTFC治疗的患者在突发疼痛发作的疼痛强度方面有显著更大的改善(P < 0.0001)。与口服吗啡治疗的39%发作相比,OTFC治疗的56%突发疼痛发作在15分钟时疼痛强度较基线降低超过33%(P < 0.0001)。患者和医生的整体评估更倾向于OTFC而非口服吗啡(P < 0.0001)。两个研究组中补救镇痛的需求相似(P > 0.05)。两种研究药物耐受性良好。
在治疗癌症疼痛突发方面,发现OTFC比即释口服吗啡起效更快。