• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作场所美学:环境对员工健康的影响?

Workplace aesthetics: Impact of environments upon employee health?

作者信息

Schell Elisabet, Theorell Tores, Saraste Helena

机构信息

Karolinska Institutet, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Torsburgsvägen 2, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Work. 2011;39(3):203-13. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2011-1182.

DOI:10.3233/WOR-2011-1182
PMID:21709357
Abstract

Associations between self-reported need for aesthetic improvements in the workplace and the need for ergonomic improvement and health factors were investigated to determine the possible impact of aesthetic needs on job performance. The need for aesthetic improvements were compared with the need for ergonomic improvements. All employees at a Swedish broadcasting company were invited to participate in this cross sectional study. Of those who fulfilled the inclusion criteria the participation rate was 74% (1961/2641). Demographic data was obtained from company files and pre-validated questionnaire was used for data collections from the participants. additional questions on needs for improvement were developed, tested for repeatability, and demonstrated to be within acceptable limits. Differences between 'high rank' and 'low rank' aesthetic needs and ergonomic needs were correlated to set ups of demographic, work environmental and organisational and health variables.The perceived needs for aesthetic and ergonomic improvements showed significantly different distributions (p<0.001). Aesthetic needs were more frequently reported than ergonomic needs. There was no significant gender related difference in response distribution of aesthetic or ergonomic needs, whereas differences between occupational groups were shown (0.006 and 0.003). 'High rank' needs for aesthetic improvement were associated to psychologically demanding work, negative work stress, sleep disturbances, problems at work, musculoskeletal pain and lower age. Gender and physical training did not differ between 'high and low rank' responders regarding neither aesthetic nor ergonomic needs. Sick leave was stronger related to ergonomics. The independently tested associations with aesthetic needs were similar to, but fewer than those for ergonomic needs with regard to the variable set ups. Sixteen studied factors out of 24, showed significant difference between 'high and low rank' aesthetic needs, and 21/24 of ergonomic needs, independently tested. The study results show a relation between work place aesthetics and health and well-being. Future work health promotion and prevention may benefit from the inclusion of an assessment of workplace aesthetics.

摘要

为了确定审美需求对工作绩效的可能影响,研究了自我报告的工作场所审美改善需求与人体工程学改善需求和健康因素之间的关联。将审美改善需求与人体工程学改善需求进行了比较。瑞典一家广播公司的所有员工都被邀请参与这项横断面研究。在符合纳入标准的人员中,参与率为74%(1961/2641)。人口统计学数据从公司档案中获取,预先验证的问卷用于从参与者那里收集数据。还设计了关于改善需求的额外问题,测试了其可重复性,并证明在可接受范围内。“高等级”和“低等级”审美需求与人体工程学需求之间的差异与人口统计学、工作环境、组织和健康变量的设置相关。审美和人体工程学改善的感知需求显示出显著不同的分布(p<0.001)。审美需求的报告频率高于人体工程学需求。在审美或人体工程学需求的反应分布方面,没有显著的性别相关差异,而职业群体之间存在差异(0.006和0.003)。“高等级”审美改善需求与心理要求高的工作、负面工作压力、睡眠障碍、工作问题、肌肉骨骼疼痛和较低年龄相关。在审美和人体工程学需求方面,“高等级”和“低等级”回答者之间的性别和体育锻炼没有差异。病假与人体工程学的关系更强。就变量设置而言,与审美需求独立测试的关联与人体工程学需求相似,但数量较少。在24个研究因素中,16个在“高等级”和“低等级”审美需求之间显示出显著差异,24个中有21个在人体工程学需求方面独立测试显示出显著差异。研究结果表明工作场所美学与健康和幸福之间存在关联。未来的工作健康促进和预防可能会受益于纳入对工作场所美学的评估。

相似文献

1
Workplace aesthetics: Impact of environments upon employee health?工作场所美学:环境对员工健康的影响?
Work. 2011;39(3):203-13. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2011-1182.
2
Workplace aesthetics: impact of environments upon employee health as compared to ergonomics.工作场所美学:与人体工程学相比,环境对员工健康的影响。
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:1430-40. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0334-1430.
3
Prevention of occupational musculo-skeletal injuries. Labour Inspectorate investigation.职业性肌肉骨骼损伤的预防。劳动监察局调查。
Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl. 1996;35:1-34.
4
A corporate workplace model for ergonomic assessments and improvements.一种用于人体工程学评估与改进的企业工作场所模式。
Appl Ergon. 2008 Mar;39(2):219-28. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.05.006. Epub 2007 Jun 25.
5
Improving office work: a participatory ergonomic experiment in a naturalistic setting.
Ergonomics. 1997 Apr;40(4):435-49. doi: 10.1080/001401397188071.
6
[Working and health conditions and preventive measures in a random sample of 5000 workers in the Veneto Region examined by telephone interview].[通过电话访谈对威尼托地区5000名工人随机样本的工作与健康状况及预防措施进行的调查]
Med Lav. 2008;99 Suppl 1:9-30.
7
Job stress management and ergonomic intervention for work-related upper extremity symptoms.针对与工作相关的上肢症状的工作压力管理和工效学干预。
Appl Ergon. 2004 Nov;35(6):565-74. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.05.003.
8
Self-reported musculoskeletal pain and working conditions among employees in the Swedish public sector.瑞典公共部门员工的自我报告的肌肉骨骼疼痛与工作条件
Work. 2007;28(1):33-46.
9
What works best for whom? An exploratory, subgroup analysis in a randomized, controlled trial on the effectiveness of a workplace intervention in low back pain patients on return to work.什么对谁最有效?一项关于工作场所干预对腰痛患者重返工作岗位有效性的随机对照试验中的探索性亚组分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 20;34(12):1243-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a09631.
10
Dual source support and control at work in relation to poor health.工作中的双重来源支持与控制与健康不佳有关。
Scand J Public Health. 2005;33(6):455-63. doi: 10.1080/14034940510006030.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of Life and Wellbeing Parameters of Academic Dental and Nursing Personnel vs. Quality of Services.学术牙科和护理人员的生活质量与幸福参数对比服务质量
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 21;11(20):2792. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11202792.
2
Wood in office spaces: The impact of different wooden furniture on aesthetic evaluation.办公空间中的木材:不同木质家具对审美评价的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 5;13:986627. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.986627. eCollection 2022.
3
Does self-reported chronic pain influence savoring of aesthetic experiences?
自我报告的慢性疼痛是否会影响审美体验的享受?
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 12;16(11):e0259198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259198. eCollection 2021.