Suppr超能文献

通过脑电双频指数评分,比较地西泮诱导的抗焦虑作用和咪达唑仑诱导的镇静作用。

Comparison by means of bispectral index score, between anxiolysis induced by diazepam and sedation induced by midazolam.

作者信息

Manani G, Facco E, Favero L, Favero G A, Berengo M, Stellini E, Bressan E, Bacci C, Sivolella S, Mazzuchin M, Zanette G

机构信息

Department of Medico-Surgical Specialties, University of Padua, Italy.

出版信息

Minerva Stomatol. 2011 Jul-Aug;60(7-8):365-81.

Abstract

AIM

Bispectral Index Score (BIS) is an objective tool to assess sedation depth. Benzodiazepines have different pharmacological profiles and diazepam may be safer than midazolam in this setting. The aim of this study was to compare BIS values observed during anxiolysis after diazepam versus sedation after midazolam.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups: group 1 was treated with i.v. diazepam, groups 2 and 3 with iv midazolam 1 and 3 mg, respectively. Sedation was monitored clinically and by means of BIS. BIS values were evaluated as area under the curve (AUC) and compared by variance analysis. The statistical comparison of other data was performed by variance analysis or, alternatively, the χ2 according to Yates. The statistical significance was indicated by P values <0.05.

RESULTS

AUC values were significantly lower after midazolam when compared to AUC values registered in diazepam treated patients; 22.6% of the group 3 patients showed BIS values <80, versus 0.4% of group 1 patients.

CONCLUSION

Diazepam has a safer profile, with BIS values and clinical conditions according to the definition of minimal and/or moderate sedation. Diazepam represents the safer drug for anxiety management in dentistry, because regularly produces a state of sedation during which verbal contact with the patient is maintained and carry a margin of safety wide enough to render loss of consciousness unlikely.

摘要

目的

脑电双频指数(BIS)是评估镇静深度的客观工具。苯二氮䓬类药物具有不同的药理学特性,在这种情况下地西泮可能比咪达唑仑更安全。本研究的目的是比较地西泮抗焦虑期间与咪达唑仑镇静期间观察到的BIS值。

方法

36例患者随机分为3组:第1组静脉注射地西泮治疗,第2组和第3组分别静脉注射1 mg和3 mg咪达唑仑。通过临床和BIS监测镇静情况。BIS值以曲线下面积(AUC)评估,并通过方差分析进行比较。其他数据的统计学比较采用方差分析,或者根据Yates法采用χ2检验。P值<0.05表示具有统计学意义。

结果

与地西泮治疗患者记录的AUC值相比,咪达唑仑后的AUC值显著更低;第3组22.6%的患者BIS值<80,而第1组患者为0.4%。

结论

根据最小和/或中度镇静的定义,地西泮具有更安全的特性,其BIS值和临床状况更佳。地西泮是牙科焦虑管理中更安全的药物,因为它通常会产生一种镇静状态,在此期间能与患者保持言语交流,且安全范围足够宽,不太可能导致意识丧失。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验