• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

写作中的伦理道德:学会避免抄袭和科研不端行为。

Ethics in writing: Learning to stay away from plagiarism and scientific misconduct.

作者信息

Sharma Bharat Bhushan, Singh Virendra

机构信息

Division of Allergy and Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, India.

出版信息

Lung India. 2011 Apr;28(2):148-50. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.80337.

DOI:10.4103/0970-2113.80337
PMID:21712931
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3109843/
Abstract

Fraudulent data and plagiarized text may corrupt scientific medical literature and ultimately harm patients. By prescribing erroneous treatment to an individual, only single patient is affected; but by presenting incorrect data or transcripts, the whole scientific medical universe is affected. Although both scenarios are highly undesirable, one can assume the magnitude of the effect of latter. Writers of scientific medical literature have been found to be involved in plagiarism and other publication misconducts from time to time irrespective of social, economic and geographic structure. The reason of such behavior is not usually obvious. Easy availability of personal computers has led to widespread dissemination of medical literature. As a result, young scientists are now publishing their research more frequently and efficiently. At the same time, this has increased the tendency to submit hurriedly prepared, poorly drafted and even illegitimate publications. Use of some amount of copy-paste followed by modifications during preparation of a manuscript seems to be common. Therefore, the researchers, especially postgraduate students, should be educated continuously about ethical medical writing.

摘要

欺诈性数据和抄袭文本可能会破坏科学医学文献,最终损害患者利益。给个体开出错误的治疗方案,只会影响单个患者;但呈现不正确的数据或记录,则会影响整个科学医学领域。尽管这两种情况都非常不可取,但人们可以想象后者影响的程度。人们发现,无论社会、经济和地理结构如何,科学医学文献的作者时不时会涉及抄袭和其他出版不当行为。这种行为的原因通常并不明显。个人电脑的普及导致医学文献广泛传播。结果,年轻科学家现在更频繁、高效地发表他们的研究成果。与此同时,这也增加了匆忙提交准备不充分、起草不佳甚至非法出版物的倾向。在撰写手稿时使用一定量的复制粘贴然后修改似乎很常见。因此,应该持续对研究人员,尤其是研究生进行医学伦理写作教育。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d4b/3109843/e697fe584945/LI-28-148-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d4b/3109843/e697fe584945/LI-28-148-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d4b/3109843/e697fe584945/LI-28-148-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Ethics in writing: Learning to stay away from plagiarism and scientific misconduct.写作中的伦理道德:学会避免抄袭和科研不端行为。
Lung India. 2011 Apr;28(2):148-50. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.80337.
2
Pitfalls and Misconducts in Medical Writing.医学写作中的陷阱与不当行为。
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2019 Dec;18(4):350-353. doi: 10.1177/1534734619870083. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
3
Plagiarism: A Bird's Eye View.抄袭:鸟瞰图。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Nov 20;38(45):e373. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e373.
4
Knowing and avoiding plagiarism during scientific writing.在科学写作过程中了解并避免抄袭。
Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014 Sep;4(Suppl 3):S193-8. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.141957.
5
Scientific misconduct as a dilemma for nursing.科学不端行为:护理领域面临的困境
Image J Nurs Sch. 1992 Spring;24(1):51-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1992.tb00699.x.
6
Plagiarism in scientific research and publications and how to prevent it.科学研究与出版物中的剽窃行为以及如何预防它。
Mater Sociomed. 2014 Apr;26(2):141-6. doi: 10.5455/msm.2014.26.141-146. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
7
The confounding factors leading to plagiarism in academic writing and some suggested remedies: A systematic review.学术写作中导致抄袭的混杂因素及一些建议的补救措施:一项系统综述。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 May;67(5):767-772.
8
The Cultural Context of Plagiarism and Research Misconduct in the Asian Region.亚洲地区学术不端和剽窃行为的文化背景。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Mar 27;38(12):e88. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e88.
9
How do we handle self-plagiarism in submitted manuscripts?我们如何处理已提交稿件中的自我剽窃行为?
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2013;23(2):150-3. doi: 10.11613/bm.2013.019.
10
Plagiarism detection and prevention: a primer for researchers.抄袭检测与预防:研究人员入门指南
Reumatologia. 2021;59(3):132-137. doi: 10.5114/reum.2021.105974. Epub 2021 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
The Cultural Context of Plagiarism and Research Misconduct in the Asian Region.亚洲地区学术不端和剽窃行为的文化背景。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Mar 27;38(12):e88. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e88.
2
Research ethics: a profile of retractions from world class universities.研究伦理:世界一流大学撤稿情况概述
Scientometrics. 2021;126(8):6871-6889. doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-03987-y. Epub 2021 May 23.
3
Publication Practices and Responsible Authorship: A Review Article.出版规范与责任署名:一篇综述文章

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic characterizations of text similarity in full text biomedical publications.全文生物医学文献中文本相似度的系统特征描述。
PLoS One. 2010 Sep 15;5(9):e12704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012704.
2
The committee on publication ethics flowcharts.出版伦理委员会流程图。
Chest. 2010 Jan;137(1):221-3. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-1565.
3
How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data.有多少科学家伪造和篡改研究数据?对调查数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Public Health Afr. 2017 Jun 27;8(1):723. doi: 10.4081/jphia.2017.723. eCollection 2017 Jun 23.
4
Plagiarism- Cut it at the roots.杜绝抄袭——斩草除根。
J Orthop Case Rep. 2015 Jan-Mar;5(1):3-4. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.241.
5
Rising from Plagiarising.从抄袭中崛起。
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015 Sep;14(3):538-40. doi: 10.1007/s12663-014-0705-x. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
6
Knowing and avoiding plagiarism during scientific writing.在科学写作过程中了解并避免抄袭。
Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014 Sep;4(Suppl 3):S193-8. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.141957.
7
Plagiarism: trespassing the grey zone between searching and researching.剽窃:跨越搜索与研究之间的灰色地带。
Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013 Nov;3(Suppl 1):S56-8. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.121229.
8
Publication process at Lung India: Some FAQs and the editorial perspective.《印度肺部疾病》的出版流程:一些常见问题及编辑观点
Lung India. 2013 Jan;30(1):1-2. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.106117.
9
Lung India: 30 years of my association.《印度肺部疾病杂志》:我与之相伴的30年。
Lung India. 2012 Jul;29(3):203-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.99095.
10
Publication: An essential step in research.发表:研究中的关键一步。
Lung India. 2011 Oct;28(4):324-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.85752.
PLoS One. 2009 May 29;4(5):e5738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
4
Déjà vu--a study of duplicate citations in Medline.似曾相识——对医学在线数据库(Medline)中重复引用的一项研究。
Bioinformatics. 2008 Jan 15;24(2):243-9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm574. Epub 2007 Dec 1.
5
Misconduct by researchers and authors.研究人员和作者的不当行为。
Gac Sanit. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(6):492-9. doi: 10.1157/13112245.
6
Policing plagiarism.打击剽窃行为。
BMJ. 2007 Nov 10;335(7627):963-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39388.668773.47.
7
Plagiarism - please don't copy.剽窃——请勿抄袭。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Oct;64(4):403-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.03042.x.
8
Frequently asked questions regarding self-plagiarism: How to avoid recycling fraud.关于自我剽窃的常见问题:如何避免重复利用欺诈行为。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Sep;57(3):527. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.05.018.
9
What is the future of peer review? Why is there fraud in science? Is plagiarism out of control? Why do scientists do bad things? Is it all a case of: "all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"?同行评审的未来会怎样?科学领域为何会存在欺诈行为?剽窃现象是否已失控?科学家为何会做出不良行为?这一切是否都如“邪恶得逞的唯一必要条件是好人无所作为”这句话所说的那样?
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007;3(1):39-53.
10
Research misconduct: the poisoning of the well.研究不端行为:恶意中伤。
J R Soc Med. 2006 May;99(5):232-7. doi: 10.1177/014107680609900514.