Sawata Hiroshi, Tsutani Kiichiro
Department of Drug Policy and Management, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
BMC Res Notes. 2011 Jun 29;4:222. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-222.
Clinical investigations are important for obtaining evidence to improve medical treatment. Large-scale clinical trials with thousands of participants are particularly important for this purpose in cardiovascular diseases. Conducting large-scale clinical trials entails high research costs. This study sought to investigate global trends in large-scale clinical trials in cardiovascular diseases.
We searched for trials using clinicaltrials.gov (URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/) using the key words 'cardio' and 'event' in all fields on 10 April, 2010. We then selected trials with 300 or more participants examining cardiovascular diseases. The search revealed 344 trials that met our criteria. Of 344 trials, 71% were randomized controlled trials, 15% involved more than 10,000 participants, and 59% were funded by industry. In RCTs whose results were disclosed, 55% of industry-funded trials and 25% of non-industry funded trials reported statistically significant superiority over control (p = 0.012, 2-sided Fisher's exact test).
Our findings highlighted concerns regarding potential bias related to funding sources, and that researchers should be aware of the importance of trial information disclosures and conflicts of interest. We should keep considering management and training regarding information disclosures and conflicts of interest for researchers. This could lead to better clinical evidence and further improvements in the development of medical treatment worldwide.
临床研究对于获取改善医疗的证据至关重要。在心血管疾病领域,涉及数千名参与者的大规模临床试验对于实现这一目的尤为重要。开展大规模临床试验需要高昂的研究成本。本研究旨在调查心血管疾病大规模临床试验的全球趋势。
我们于2010年4月10日在ClinicalTrials.gov(网址:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/)上使用关键词“心脏”和“事件”在所有字段中搜索试验。然后我们选择了300名或更多参与者的心血管疾病试验。搜索结果显示有344项试验符合我们的标准。在这344项试验中,71%为随机对照试验,15%涉及超过10000名参与者,59%由行业资助。在已披露结果的随机对照试验中,55%的行业资助试验和25%的非行业资助试验报告了相对于对照组具有统计学意义的优越性(双侧Fisher精确检验,p = 0.012)。
我们的研究结果突出了对与资金来源相关潜在偏倚的担忧,并且研究人员应意识到试验信息披露和利益冲突的重要性。我们应持续考虑针对研究人员的信息披露和利益冲突的管理与培训。这可能会带来更好的临床证据,并在全球范围内进一步改善医疗发展。