• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本大规模临床试验中关于心血管疾病的资金和基础设施:一项问卷调查研究证据。

Funding and infrastructure among large-scale clinical trials examining cardiovascular diseases in Japan: evidence from a questionnaire survey.

机构信息

Department of Drug Policy and Management, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Nov 1;11:148. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-148.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-11-148
PMID:22044508
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3228708/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Large-scale clinical trials with thousands of participants are often needed to evaluate the risk reductions of cardiac events and/or death. Many recent clinical trials have evaluated the incidences of cardiac events using hard endpoints, especially in cardiovascular and metabolic medicine. A high investigation cost is involved in conducting a large-scale clinical trial, and obtaining sufficient funding is essential. The infrastructural environment of clinical trials is currently inadequate in Japan. We conducted a questionnaire-based survey to address this issue. The present study sought to clarify the current situation surrounding large-scale clinical trials in terms of funding and infrastructure, and to inform discussion about improving the financial and infrastructural situation for clinical trials.

METHODS

We sent questionnaires to 119 sponsors of large-scale clinical trials between August 2007 and December 2007, and between July 2009 and August 2009. Answers to each question were summarized and data were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

We received responses from the sponsors of 63 (52.9%) out of 119 trials to which questionnaires were sent. The results revealed that 25 trials (39.7%) were funded by foundations, and 21 trials (33.3%) were funded by public agencies. All of the foundations involved in conducting clinical trials, where funding sources were specified, were funded by private organizations such as pharmaceutical companies. All of the clinical trials with a cost of JPY 300 million (USD 3.27 million) or more were funded by private organizations, and none were funded solely by public agencies. The sponsors of 23 trials (36.5%) responded that the trial was 'not registered' to clinical trial registry.

CONCLUSIONS

The questionnaire responses revealed that there were still many trials whose funding sources were unclear and many sponsors were unaware of their responsibilities in managing and/or financing the costs of clinical trials. These findings indicate that further discussion is required to establish appropriate frameworks and/or rules regarding funding, while considering conflicts of interest. This discussion should take place as soon as possible to facilitate appropriate clinical trials.

摘要

背景

为了评估心脏事件和/或死亡的风险降低,通常需要进行有数千名参与者的大规模临床试验。许多最近的临床试验使用硬终点评估心脏事件的发生率,特别是在心血管和代谢医学领域。进行大规模临床试验需要高昂的调查成本,获得足够的资金至关重要。日本目前的临床试验基础设施环境还不够完善。我们进行了一项基于问卷调查的调查来解决这个问题。本研究旨在阐明当前在资金和基础设施方面的大规模临床试验现状,并为改善临床试验的财务和基础设施状况提供信息。

方法

我们于 2007 年 8 月至 12 月和 2009 年 7 月至 8 月期间向 119 个大规模临床试验的赞助商发送了问卷。对每个问题的回答进行了总结,并进行了统计分析。

结果

我们收到了对 119 项试验中 63 项(52.9%)试验的赞助商的回复。结果表明,25 项试验(39.7%)由基金会资助,21 项试验(33.3%)由公共机构资助。所有参与临床试验的基金会,如果指定了资金来源,则全部由制药公司等私营组织资助。所有成本达到 3 亿日元(3270 万美元)或以上的临床试验均由私营组织资助,没有一个是完全由公共机构资助的。23 项试验的赞助商(36.5%)回应称该试验“未注册”临床试验登记处。

结论

问卷回复显示,仍有许多试验的资金来源不清楚,许多赞助商不知道自己在管理和/或资助临床试验成本方面的责任。这些发现表明,需要进一步讨论建立适当的框架和/或规则,考虑利益冲突。为了促进适当的临床试验,应尽快进行此类讨论。

相似文献

1
Funding and infrastructure among large-scale clinical trials examining cardiovascular diseases in Japan: evidence from a questionnaire survey.日本大规模临床试验中关于心血管疾病的资金和基础设施:一项问卷调查研究证据。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Nov 1;11:148. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-148.
2
Limited accessibility to designs and results of Japanese large-scale clinical trials for cardiovascular diseases.日本心血管疾病大规模临床试验的设计和结果获取受限。
Trials. 2011 Apr 14;12:96. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-96.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Reported outcomes in major cardiovascular clinical trials funded by for-profit and not-for-profit organizations: 2000-2005.营利性和非营利性组织资助的主要心血管临床试验报告的结果:2000 - 2005年。
JAMA. 2006 May 17;295(19):2270-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.19.2270.
5
Outcome reporting among drug trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov.临床试验注册中心登记的药物试验结局报告。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Aug 3;153(3):158-66. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-3-201008030-00006.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Impact of the Clinical Trials Act 2018 on clinical trial activity in Japan from 2018 to 2020: a retrospective database study using new and conventional Japanese registries.2018 年临床试验法对 2018 年至 2020 年日本临床试验活动的影响:使用新的和传统的日本注册数据库进行的回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 18;12(7):e059092. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059092.
8
Differential citation rates of major cardiovascular clinical trials according to source of funding: a survey from 2000 to 2005.根据资金来源划分的主要心血管临床试验的差异引用率:2000年至2005年的一项调查
Circulation. 2008 Sep 23;118(13):1321-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.794016. Epub 2008 Sep 8.
9
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
10
Association of industry sponsorship to published outcomes in gastrointestinal clinical research.胃肠道临床研究中行业赞助与发表成果的关联。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Dec;4(12):1445-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.08.019. Epub 2006 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Review of the registration of clinical trials in UMIN-CTR from 2 June 2005 to 1 June 2010 - focus on Japan domestic, academic clinical trials.2005年6月2日至2010年6月1日期间UMIN-CTR中临床试验注册情况的回顾——聚焦日本国内学术性临床试验。
Trials. 2013 Oct 14;14:333. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-333.

本文引用的文献

1
Limited accessibility to designs and results of Japanese large-scale clinical trials for cardiovascular diseases.日本心血管疾病大规模临床试验的设计和结果获取受限。
Trials. 2011 Apr 14;12:96. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-96.
2
Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.《赫尔辛基宣言》。涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则。
J Indian Med Assoc. 2009 Jun;107(6):403-5.
3
Industry-supported meta-analyses compared with meta-analyses with non-profit or no support: differences in methodological quality and conclusions.与由非营利组织支持或无支持的荟萃分析相比,行业支持的荟萃分析:方法学质量和结论的差异。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Sep 9;8:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-60.
4
Is there evidence for biased reporting of published adverse effects data in pharmaceutical industry-funded studies?在制药行业资助的研究中,是否存在已发表的不良反应数据报告存在偏差的证据?
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Dec;66(6):767-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03272.x. Epub 2008 Jul 31.
5
Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review.Cochrane系统评价与行业支持的Meta分析及相同药物的其他Meta分析的比较:系统评价
BMJ. 2006 Oct 14;333(7572):782. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38973.444699.0B. Epub 2006 Oct 6.
6
Reported outcomes in major cardiovascular clinical trials funded by for-profit and not-for-profit organizations: 2000-2005.营利性和非营利性组织资助的主要心血管临床试验报告的结果:2000 - 2005年。
JAMA. 2006 May 17;295(19):2270-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.19.2270.
7
Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.临床试验注册:国际医学期刊编辑委员会声明
N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 16;351(12):1250-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe048225. Epub 2004 Sep 8.
8
Is angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor useful in a Japanese population for secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction? A final report of the Japanese Acute Myocardial Infarction Prospective (JAMP) study.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂对日本人群急性心肌梗死后的二级预防是否有用?日本急性心肌梗死前瞻性(JAMP)研究的最终报告。
Am Heart J. 2004 Aug;148(2):e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.03.035.
9
Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: a reflection of treatment effect or adverse events?随机药物试验中资金与结论的关联:是治疗效果还是不良事件的反映?
JAMA. 2003 Aug 20;290(7):921-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.7.921.
10
Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review.制药行业赞助与研究结果及质量:系统评价
BMJ. 2003 May 31;326(7400):1167-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7400.1167.