Mirail University, Toulouse, France.
Autism. 2011 Nov;15(6):702-12. doi: 10.1177/1362361310394219. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
We compared the capacity of children, adolescents and adults with and without autism to use (a) intent and severity of consequences information for attributing blame to an offender, and (b) intent and apologies information for inferring willingness to forgive. Participants were presented with two sets of six scenarios obtained by combination of intent and severity (or apology) information, and instructed to indicate appropriate levels of blame (or willingness to forgive). In the blame condition, persons with autism were able to consistently use intent information but not to the same degree as their comparison counterparts. In the forgiveness condition, intent was not taken into account for judging by persons with autism, irrespective of their age.
我们比较了自闭症儿童、青少年和成年人与非自闭症者在以下两个方面的能力:(a)使用意图和后果严重程度信息来归因于犯罪者,以及(b)使用意图和道歉信息来推断宽恕的意愿。参与者被呈现了两套由意图和严重程度(或道歉)信息组合而成的六个场景,并被指示指出适当的责备(或宽恕意愿)水平。在责备条件下,自闭症患者能够始终如一地使用意图信息,但不如其对照组那样程度。在宽恕条件下,自闭症患者无论年龄大小,都没有考虑意图来进行判断。